Trade rumours

[DeeSpencer 26,081]

2 hours ago, A F said:

Gives us plenty of time to court some clubs RE: a pick upgrade with our second rounders.

Am I clinging to hope unrealistically? 

If we can't get in to the top 15 I'd rather keep our 3rd pick at 36. Use 47 to upgrade one of the first two picks as high as it can go but I'd want to get 3 ok picks in rather than 1 good one, 1 ok one and one dodgy one. 

Such a shame live trading in the draft isn't allowed because this really is the perfect scenario for the club trading up on draft night if they have a player they want around the 15-25 mark. 

[Sydee 4,529]

22 minutes ago, Skuit said:

Fair Enuff is only one word in Richmond.

At least Biff got the Richmond spelling correct

[Willmoy1947 4,140]

59 minutes ago, Skuit said:

Fair Enuff is only one word in Richmond.

Riewoldt......

[dl4e 5,851]

Gibbs a crow.

[daisycutter 29,738]

only 1 day left to get the hogan trade done

[daisycutter 29,738]

7 minutes ago, dl4e said:

Gibbs a crow.

nearly but not yet

[buck_nekkid 6,046]

Are we done yet?  What/who is left for us to target, or do we upgrade picks?

[faultydet 7,619]

51 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

nearly but not yet

Will be a very large bonus to see Adelaide sell the farm for Gibbs, thinking they can still win the flag next year, and fall flat on their faces with an aging list, and no early picks.

 

Conversely, will be sickening to see the Blues with 2 x  extra first round picks, and a young list with some talent already on it.

Hope they fluff the picks badly. Stuff both of them., 

Edited October 18, 2017 by faultydet

[What 18,810]

 

Do we have too many draft picks and not enough available list spots? Would this mean a trade is imminent?

[dazzledavey36 55,352]

Looks like that's us done for three trade period!

[WA Demon13 39]

Sorry if its onthe wrong thread but just a hyperthetical for next year.

The trtade rumours of Hogan to head back home will be bbeating lowder than ever and I think he is a real chance to elect to go - obviously dependent on where we and Freo finish.

I would be demanding  the 2 first rounders as a base minimum and be looking at slingshotting them to GC for Lynch who is  already talking of heading back to Victoria.

IMO thats a like for like WIn / Win.

Please let me reiterate that I am a huge Hogan fan and do not want him to leave at all

[Ethan Tremblay 30,967]

1 hour ago, buck_nekkid said:

Are we done yet?  What/who is left for us to target, or do we upgrade picks?

Hogan is still to be traded according to @Tram 74

[What 18,810]

5 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Hogan is still to be traded according to @Tram 74

Now now dont be angry ETthetradebreaker, you cant get every scoop.

[Jibroni 5,009]

 

Charlie Cameron to Brisbane for Pick 12 then Picks 12 to us for for 29, 31 and 36. You heard it first

[Its Time for Another 4,287]

1 minute ago, Jibroni said:

 

Charlie Cameron to Brisbane for Pick 12 then Picks 12 to us for for 29, 31 and 36. You heard it first

Doesn’t leave us with enough picks in the draft 

[Wells 11 5,422]

20 minutes ago, WA Demon13 said:

Sorry if its onthe wrong thread but just a hyperthetical for next year.

The trtade rumours of Hogan to head back home will be bbeating lowder than ever and I think he is a real chance to elect to go - obviously dependent on where we and Freo finish.

I would be demanding  the 2 first rounders as a base minimum and be looking at slingshotting them to GC for Lynch who is  already talking of heading back to Victoria.

IMO thats a like for like WIn / Win.

Please let me reiterate that I am a huge Hogan fan and do not want him to leave at all

Id be demanding not just 2 first rounders but two top 10 picks....just like we made to get him in the first place! But next year is a long way off and if we're a good team I reckon he'll want to stay. 

[Cards13 9,117]

33 minutes ago, WA Demon13 said:

Sorry if its onthe wrong thread but just a hyperthetical for next year.

The trtade rumours of Hogan to head back home will be bbeating lowder than ever and I think he is a real chance to elect to go - obviously dependent on where we and Freo finish.

I would be demanding  the 2 first rounders as a base minimum and be looking at slingshotting them to GC for Lynch who is  already talking of heading back to Victoria.

IMO thats a like for like WIn / Win.

Please let me reiterate that I am a huge Hogan fan and do not want him to leave at all

Oh for fks sake.... 

[whatwhat say what 22,947]

no need to pass anything on to gc17 - lynch is a free agent, so can go where he chooses

pies think it'll be them

[demoniac 1,336]

3 minutes ago, DemonAndrew said:

no need to pass anything on to gc17 - lynch is a free agent, so can go where he chooses

pies think it'll be them

unrestricted or restricted?

[The Stigga 1,094]

33 minutes ago, It's Time said:

Doesn’t leave us with enough picks in the draft 

Correct. Also 29 and 31 would be equal in points to at least pick 13 if not 12.

 

[Demon Disciple 12,274]

24 minutes ago, demoniac said:

unrestricted or restricted?

restricted

[Clintosaurus 7,861]

53 minutes ago, It's Time said:

Doesn’t leave us with enough picks in the draft 

We would have 12, 36 and 84 which would be enough.

Edited October 18, 2017 by Clintosaurus

[Ted Lasso 19,549]

We have done well with later picks so I'll back Jason Taylor and the team in with four picks under 47

[demoniac 1,336]

17 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

restricted

which means if GC match, which would do, it'd be a trade situation.

[Its Time for Another 4,287]

17 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

We would have 12, 36 and 84 which would be enough.

Nope. He was giving up 36 as well