TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond

[Redlagged 806]

3 minutes ago, one_demon said:

Looks like Viney, Lever and Weideman will go out and Dunstan, Smith and Brown in.

Doubt Dunstan. Sparrow will put in more on ball minutes to cover Viney. His big chance. Also Brayshaw....

[dl4e 5,594]

Weed is in the starting 18 so he plays. Forward line with Brown, weed and t-mac is fraught with danger. It surely won't line up like that though. I don't like having lever out of the side and this only reminds me of what a load of [censored] these hs protocols are. 

[Lord Nev 13,511]

1 minute ago, Fat Tony said:

Are the 18 on the field locked in? Brown, TMac and Weideman all there. 

I have the exact same questions!

[Demons11 6,404]

9 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Doesn't Weid being named in the 18 mean he's definitely playing though?

That’s what I thought. 
 

It seems that T Mac might be pushed back.

[Fritta and Turner 3,717]

Dunstan in for Viney?

[WERRIDEE 5,218]

Interesting that they have Brown replacing Viney thought Dunstan would get a go. Brown should be in the VFL we are now too tall.

[BDA 20,234]

What I dearly hope to see some day

In: Sanity

Out: BS health and safety protocols

[Jaded No More 58,275]

I suggest Tmac goes back and Gus goes to the wing with JJ in the middle to help out without Viney. 

[drysdale demon 4,174]

5 minutes ago, dl4e said:

Weed is in the starting 18 so he plays. Forward line with Brown, weed and t-mac is fraught with danger. It surely won't line up like that though. I don't like having lever out of the side and this only reminds me of what a load of [censored] these hs protocols are. 

Protocols end tomorrow night, maybe they have it.

[Lord Nev 13,511]

Just now, drysdale demon said:

Protocols end tomorrow night, maybe they have it.

The protocols ending wouldn't mean that anyone in them before then just gets to walk out though I wouldn't think.

 

[sue 8,451]

1 minute ago, Lord Nev said:

The protocols ending wouldn't mean that anyone in them before then just gets to walk out though I wouldn't think.

 

Also the AFL would have to allow the unnamed players to play.

[rpfc 27,531]

I doubt that that team is set… although it confusing and it leads one to think that we are playing all three tall fwds.

[Bendigo_Demon 371]

I'm not going to waste too much time on suggested ins and outs 3 days away from a game when we already have 2 players out with H & S protocols. A lot can happen between now and then.

[Demon Dynasty 15,591]

Final teams by tomorrow evening i believe so the starting 18 is still open.

Gut feel instincts (ie; throw a dart)...

Smith possibly coming in for Lever,  Bedford for Viney with Sparrow / Harmes to share more of the Viney role between them?  Mostly Sparrow.  Harmes still playing his usual hybrid MF/HF role with a little more bias toward MF minutes?  Bedford to get a bit of MF time with these two but more as a high HF/Mid when these two are off and or pushing forward.

[DubDee 20,831]

Terrible luck if Viney and Lever are just close contacts and missed the end of the BS rules by 1 day!

 

[Roger Mellie 3,530]

A late withdrawal of one of Weid, TMac, Brown or possibly Jackson isn't beyond the realms of possibility

[DubDee 20,831]

2 minutes ago, Bendigo_Demon said:

I'm not going to waste too much time on suggested ins and outs 3 days away from a game when we already have 2 players out with H & S protocols. A lot can happen between now and then.

Why not mate, we’ve been doing it for days already! 😂

[Maldonboy38 5,930]

Not a fan of Dunstan getting a run. I would rather move Brayshaw into the middle, keep Jordon and Langdon on the wings, and move Bedford onto the bench. It just looks unresloved and messy with that many names on the board. 

[Jaded No More 58,275]

1 minute ago, Roger Mellie said:

A late withdrawal of one of Weid, TMac, Brown or possibly Jackson isn't beyond the realms of possibility

We don’t play those games. 

[Rab D Nesbitt 7,247]

Well, the pecking order in the back line has become a little clearer but Brown, McDonald and Weideman up front? 

Tom Sparrow to take Viney's spot in the middle? 

As for the oppo other than Rioli I've never heard of any of their ins. 

 

[rpfc 27,531]

Just now, Jaded No More said:

We don’t play those games. 

Yes we do. Lever was out earlier in the season on the quiet and pulled out ‘at the last minute’.

We’re a footy club, not saints.

[DubDee 20,831]

Based on the 18 picked

IN Smith and Brown

OUT Viney Lever

T Mac to play back/utility. We do look tall but. 

[Macca 16,173]

With 2 forced changes do we want to take a total of 3 out of a winning side? (that is also 5 & 0)

So T-Mac & Weid to stay with T-Mac going back? 

Bedford comes in you'd imagine along with BBB

Dunstan as the sub?  Or maybe Smith for some added versatility (if needed)

 

[Roger Mellie 3,530]

1 minute ago, Jaded No More said:

We don’t play those games. 

We do if one of them needs a fitness test leading into the game

[Lil_red_fire_engine 10,219]

Goody has already said we wont play 3 key forwards. I wont put any thought into the 18 named on field and just absorb the outs and wait until the final 22 is announced tomorrow. Shame about the 2 out for protocols but it is what it is. Will be interesting to see how they cover Viney’s midfield time.