Changes vs Pies (Queens Birthday)

[titan_uranus 22,672]

33 minutes ago, Maldonboy38 said:

I loved our spine against the Hawks - TMac, Frost, N Jones, Dawes, Hogan. If that group can find some consistency then our developing midfield has a strong foundation to work from. I think Pedo is a vital swingman and we need his utility, but can we fit him onto the bench with that spine in place, Gawn in Ruck, and a very tall Watts playing as a tall forward? Not too sure.

Harmes appears to be the one out of touch. Kent has lost his attack on the ball and tackling pressure.  These two out,  but unsure who to bring in. Probably need Dunn for Cloke.

I don't think we can play Hogan, Dawes, Watts and Pedersen in the same side.

IMO, Pedersen and Dawes are fighting for the same spot and on what I saw yesterday, I'm not sold on Dawes. The more so given Pedersen will do the second ruck duties which is a far better option to Watts.

[picket fence 15,419]

13 hours ago, John Dee said:

OMac will not get dropped. Those here that say that Frost is a better defensive option are seriously deluded. I f we are going to drop a key defender, it will be Frost.

For me, I would keep that same team if possible.

Your kidding ? I thought Frost did some nice things AND he is quicker than O Mac

[Roost It 1,434]

Unchanged except maybe Kennedy in.

I felt we had a good side in against the Hawks and the result proved that.

[dazzledavey36 49,045]

I hope Grimes plays well. Id bring him in for Harmes to play that Wing/half forward. What you will get from Grimes is pressure acts and tackling and he will give you genuine 100% effort.

Harmes is starting to really tire out now and Grimes is the perfect replacement.

[Demons11 6,404]

16 hours ago, Northern Summer said:

Ins: Lumumba, Kennedy, Pedersen, Viney (hoping for a quick recovery)

Outs: Harmes, O.McDonald, Dawes, Gartlett

 

??? Garlett out - you are kidding 

Dawes played ok for his 1st game back and the conditions were against the big guys 

[barneymfc 152]

no changes ,hope vince gets off,they played well went to tall for a wet day.Cant blame the big blokes not being able to hang on to marks

[junk 342]

3 QTRS we were in it, so I can't see the need for changes. Dawes,Trengove and Vander will be better for the run. If we can win 6 more matches it would be good. 

[dpositive 1,557]

17 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I start a new job on QB, would it look bad if I took a sicky to watch the game? Kent out Kennedy in.

Depends who the boss barracks for.

But let them know early that you will be more productive if allowed to go, and if/ when we win you will be ultra productive with a positive attitude that will inspire the company. Of course should we lose you will be ultra productive as you focus on tasks and concentrate on displaying the resilience that all employees need to perform at their maximum. 

[The Song Formerly Known As 6,479]

43 minutes ago, ENYAW said:

3 QTRS we were in it, so I can't see the need for changes. Dawes,Trengove and Vander will be better for the run. If we can win 6 more matches it would be good. 

Which 6 do you think we will win? 

[What 18,810]

2 minutes ago, The Song Formerly Known As said:

Which 6 do you think we will win? 

 

Next Monday will be one of them thats for sure

[Ethan Tremblay 28,470]

47 minutes ago, dpositive said:

Depends who the boss barracks for.

But let them know early that you will be more productive if allowed to go, and if/ when we win you will be ultra productive with a positive attitude that will inspire the company. Of course should we lose you will be ultra productive as you focus on tasks and concentrate on displaying the resilience that all employees need to perform at their maximum. 

It sounds like I'd be doing my new workplace a disservice if I were to work on QB. 

Edited June 5, 2016 by Ethan Tremblay

[dl4e 5,635]

Dawes out and Kennedy in. Don't care about conditions.

[hemingway 7,601]

21 hours ago, Petraccattack said:

 Nine day break.  We are a better team and it will be disappointing if we do not smash them.

Please don't make statements like that. We will be a better team on the day if we win. It's a week to week call.

[M_9 1,740]

[titan_uranus 22,672]

With Garland and now Dunn injured, OMac and Frost are safe. 

Kennedy for Harmes the only change IMO.

[Bitter but optimistic 21,412]

1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

It sounds like I'd be doing my new workplace a disservice if I were to work on QB. 

I presume your new employment is in a morally corrupt industry Ethan.

[What 18,810]

In - Kennedy, Spencer

Out - Dawes, Harmes

 

[daisycutter 28,641]

cabin fever????

[Gorgoroth 12,337]

In Ben Ken. Out Harmes.

Thats all thats needed.

[CBDees 3,162]

In Weideman (to kick the winning goal)!

[beelzebub 22,269]

1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

In Ben Ken. Out Harmes.

Thats all thats needed.

I cant see Roos changing a team that much that did so well 

[Binmans PA 26,313]

9 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

In - Kennedy, Spencer

Out - Dawes, Harmes

I wouldn't mind these changes. It's Harmes or Kent out for Kennedy IMO. At least Spencer could take second ruck, provide a tall target to kick to and is quicker and more agile than Dawes.

[titan_uranus 22,672]

I didn't particularly rate Dawes' game yesterday but they're not going to drop Dawes after one game.

Have we dropped anyone this season after one game? I'm not sure. We gave Michie, ANB and Newton at least two games each.

[chook fowler 18,359]

Welcome back Ben Kennedy - 30 possessions and 3 goals for Casey. Must come back against his previous club.

[Binmans PA 26,313]

9 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

I didn't particularly rate Dawes' game yesterday but they're not going to drop Dawes after one game.

Have we dropped anyone this season after one game? I'm not sure. We gave Michie, ANB and Newton at least two games each.

You're probably right, TU, but that's what I'd do.