Jump to content

Dean Kent contract


sue

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

We're reading too much into it I'd say.  

I am getting more confident that we are becoming a club that players won't want to leave, unless they are not getting a game.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good get DA - it sure does!

The complete relevant excerpt: "...Kent wants to secure his future in Melbourne beyond 2016. “I want to play some good footy and get my name out there (i.e., in context of bolded sentence, in (= at) Melbourne). Obviously, I’d love to stay at the Dees for as long as I can. I’m out of contract so there’s no pressure on me to perform or anything like that, but it’s in the back of my head and you think about your contract"...". Still not sure about that last sentence - possibly a misspoke as supposed earlier. It's not like he isn't performing!! Possibly he meant that if he hasn't given good reason for a new contract already, this year won't add much?

Edited by Timothy Reddan-A'Blew
Added last sentence
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

Very good get DA - it sure does!

The complete relevant excerpt: "...Kent wants to secure his future in Melbourne beyond 2016. “I want to play some good footy and get my name out there (i.e., in context of bolded sentence, in (= at) Melbourne). Obviously, I’d love to stay at the Dees for as long as I can. I’m out of contract so there’s no pressure on me to perform or anything like that, but it’s in the back of my head and you think about your contract"...". Still not sure about that last sentence - possibly a misspoke as supposed earlier. It's not like he isn't performing!! Possibly he meant that if he hasn't given good reason for a new contract already, this year won't add much?

Yeah, it's Dean Kent, hardly a wordsmith. 

The fact that he said all this before a ball was bounced makes a big difference, he's never put a block of form like this together before. 

No one looks like they're enjoying this team form more than him IMO, nothing to see here. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect it's a transcription issue and Kent is praising the club's approach. 

Try adding an ellipsis.

I’m out of contract so . . . there’s no pressure on me to perform or anything like that, but it’s in the back of my head and you think about your contract"

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, Redleg said:

2019
Jones 27, Melksham 24

2018
Brayshaw 19, Petracca 19, Gawn 23, Garland 26 (UFA),

2017
Dunn 27, Hogan 20, Viney 20, Lumumba
 28, Kennedy-Harris20, Salem 19, Vandenberg 23, Neal-Bullen 19, Stretch 18, Kennedy* 21, Bugg* 23, Oliver18, Weideman18, King18, Hulett18


2016
Trengove 22, Dawes 26, Grimes 25 (RFA), Watts 24 (RFA), Vince 29, Tyson* 21, Kent 21, M Jones 27, Spencer 25 (UFA), T McDonald22, Terlich 25, Jetta 25, Garlett 25, Frost 21,Newton 22, O McDonald 19, Pedersen 28, King ®19, White ®18, Smith ®20, Hunt 19, Harmes 19, Michie 23,

 

RPFC posted this earlier this year. If correct this is his last year.

Viney can now be updated to 2020.

Didn't Vince extend for another year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Skuit said:

I suspect it's a transcription issue and Kent is praising the club's approach.

Try adding an ellipsis.

I’m out of contract so . . . there’s no pressure on me to perform or anything like that, but it’s in the back of my head and you think about your contract"

Skuit, I AM IMPRESSED! I used them in my own post (and often do in my 'job') but never knew they had a name.

And you are onto something there, definitely.

I leave this day a wholer person...*

(* These hanging points have a different name?? DK may also have 'spoken' the points, too, here - the 'pregnant pause'?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

2019
Jones 27, Melksham 24

2018
Brayshaw 19, Petracca 19, Gawn 23, Garland 26 (UFA),

2017
Dunn 27, Hogan 20, Viney 20, Lumumba
 28, Kennedy-Harris20, Salem 19, Vandenberg 23, Neal-Bullen 19, Stretch 18, Kennedy* 21, Bugg* 23, Oliver18, Weideman18, King18, Hulett18


2016
Trengove 22, Dawes 26, Grimes 25 (RFA), Watts 24 (RFA), Vince 29, Tyson* 21, Kent 21, M Jones 27, Spencer 25 (UFA), T McDonald22, Terlich 25, Jetta 25, Garlett 25, Frost 21,Newton 22, O McDonald 19, Pedersen 28, King ®19, White ®18, Smith ®20, Hunt 19, Harmes 19, Michie 23,

 

RPFC posted this earlier this year. If correct this is his last year.

Viney can now be updated to 2020.

I believe this to be true also, but the free agents update from the afl only lists Dunn. Any chance they have made a huge cockup and posted the wrong year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

2019
Jones 27, Melksham 24

2018
Brayshaw 19, Petracca 19, Gawn 23, Garland 26 (UFA),

2017
Dunn 27, Hogan 20, Viney 20, Lumumba
 28, Kennedy-Harris20, Salem 19, Vandenberg 23, Neal-Bullen 19, Stretch 18, Kennedy* 21, Bugg* 23, Oliver18, Weideman18, King18, Hulett18


2016
Trengove 22, Dawes 26, Grimes 25 (RFA), Watts 24 (RFA), Vince 29, Tyson* 21, Kent 21, M Jones 27, Spencer 25 (UFA), T McDonald22, Terlich 25, Jetta 25, Garlett 25, Frost 21,Newton 22, O McDonald 19, Pedersen 28, King ®19, White ®18, Smith ®20, Hunt 19, Harmes 19, Michie 23,

 

 

Still some big names we have to sign by the end of the year. I heard Garlett isn't too far from signing on for another few years but it's guys like McDonald and Tyson that will most certainly attract the most interest from opposition clubs. Despite that, I think both will resign.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MrReims said:

I believe this to be true also, but the free agents update from the afl only lists Dunn. Any chance they have made a huge cockup and posted the wrong year?

That was the 2017 free agency list not 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

Skuit, I AM IMPRESSED! I used them in my own post (and often do in my 'job') but never knew they had a name.

And you are onto something there, definitely.

I leave this day a wholer person...*

(* These hanging points have a different name?? DK may also have 'spoken' the points, too, here - the 'pregnant pause'?)

*Aposiopesis is the rhetorical device. Marked by an ellipsis. If you're using an ellipsis for your 'job' be sure to enter spaces between the ellipsis points.

Edited by Skuit
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW! (sorry,all, I haven't left the day yet...)

Ellipsis I recognised as a word; but aposiopesis? NO WAY! Of course, my Mammoth Macquarie confirms it.

Thanks for the ellipsis advice - I had been negligent in this regard.

And, now; it may be wise if you and I draw down the curtain on this erudition. Our Demonland colleague natives will be getting restless (= pizzed)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I can't believe the hysteria over a simple quote. What is Demonland becoming? Twitter?! Everyone is outraged about everything!

Skuit's grammatical correction explains the context of the quote perfectly. Kent was basically saying that, yeah, he's out of contract, but the wonderful coaching group aren't heaping pressure on him or threatening him to perform (as we know they've done to other underperforming players who are OOC). This is likely due to his interrupted pre-season coming off hamstring surgery last year. Essentially, he's saying the club aren't putting the pressure on him in a contract year, probably because they're pretty happy with his progress.

However, it's always in the back of his mind that he's OOC and he needs to perform if he wants a good value contract.

It's not that difficult.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Lord, this thread has lost the plot.

Skuit is 100% all over it:

13 hours ago, Skuit said:

I suspect it's a transcription issue and Kent is praising the club's approach. 

Try adding an ellipsis.

I’m out of contract so . . . there’s no pressure on me to perform or anything like that, but it’s in the back of my head and you think about your contract"

It's two sentences.

First, Kent says "I'm out of contract".

Then, he talks about how, though there is no external pressure being put on him to perform (because he's out of contract), nonetheless it's in the back of his head and he thinks about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He may have said this.

"I’m out of contract. So, there’s no pressure on me. . .  to perform. . . or anything like that, but it’s in the back of my head, and . . . you think about your contract."

Punctuation makes a difference. Specially when I get it wrong.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Demon Jack said:

Still some big names we have to sign by the end of the year. I heard Garlett isn't too far from signing on for another few years but it's guys like McDonald and Tyson that will most certainly attract the most interest from opposition clubs. Despite that, I think both will resign.

 

You might want to buy a keyboard that comes with a hyphen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ManDee said:

He may have said this.

"I’m out of contract. So, there’s no pressure on me. . .  to perform. . . or anything like that, but it’s in the back of my head, and . . . you think about your contract."

Punctuation makes a difference. Specially when I get it wrong.

 

....but...he's not out of contract.....at least not until october (or is it november?)

should be "I will be out of contract at end of year. So......"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

....but...he's not out of contract.....at least not until october (or is it november?)

should be "I will be out of contract at end of year. So......"

Yes, but they are his words. It is after all a transcript of a quote.  So perhaps...

"I’m out of contract?. . . so, there’s no pressure on me to perform. . . or anything like that, but it’s in the back of my head, and . . . you think about your contract."

 

Edit: Semantics will drive us all crazy. 

Edited by ManDee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ManDee said:

 Semantics will drive us all crazy. 

:rolleyes:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    REDEEMING by Meggs

    It was such a balmy spring evening for this mid-week BNCA Pink Lady match at our favourite venue Ikon Park between two teams that had not won a game since round one.   After last week’s insipid bombing, the DeeArmy banner correctly deemanded that our players ‘go in hard, go in strong, go in fighting’, and girl they sure did!   The first quarter goals by Alyssa Bannan and Alyssia Pisano were simply stunning, and it was 4 goals to nil by half-time.   Kudos to Mick Stinear.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    REDEEM by Meggs

    How will Mick Stinear and his dwindling list of fit and available Demons respond to last week’s 65-point capitulation to the Bombers, the team’s biggest loss in history?   As a minimum he will expect genuine effort from all of his players when Melbourne takes on the GWS Giants at Ikon Park this Thursday.  Happily, the ground remains a favourite Melbourne venue of players and spectators alike and will provide an opportunity for the Demons to redeem themselves. Injuries to star play

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    EASYBEATS by Meggs

    A beautiful sunny Friday afternoon, with a light breeze and a strong Windy Hill crowd set the scene, inviting one team to seize the day and take the important four points on offer. For the Demons it was not a good Friday, easily beaten by an all-time largest losing margin of 65 points.   Essendon threw themselves into action today, winning most of the contests and had three early goals with Daria Bannister on fire.  In contrast the Demons were dropping marks, hesitant in close and comm

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 9

    DEFUSE THE BOMBERS by Meggs

    Last Saturday’s crushing loss to Fremantle, after being three goals ahead at three quarter time, should be motivation enough to bounce back for this very winnable Round 5 clash at Windy Hill. A first-time venue for the Melbourne AFLW team, this should be a familiar suburban, windy, footy environment for the players.   Essendon were brave and competitive last week against ladder leader Adelaide at Sturt’s home ground. A familiar name, Maddison Gay, was the Bombers best player with

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 33

    BLOW THE SIREN by Meggs

    Fremantle hosted the Demons on a sunny 20-degree Saturdayafternoon winning the toss and electing to defend in the first quarter against the 3-goal breeze favouring the Parry Street end. There was method here, as this would give the comeback queens, the Dockers, last use of the breeze. The Melbourne Coach had promised an improved performance, and we did start better than previous weeks, winning the ball out of the middle, using the breeze advantage and connecting to the forwards. 

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    GETAWAY by Meggs

    Calling all fit players. Expect every available Melbourne player to board the Virgin cross-continent flight to Perth for this Round 4 clash on Saturday afternoon at Fremantle Oval. It promises to be keenly contested, though Fremantle is the bookies clear favourite.  If we lose, finals could be remoter than Rottnest Island especially following on from the Dees 50-point dismantlement by North Melbourne last Sunday.  There are 8 remaining matches, over the next 7 weeks.  To Meggs’

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    DRUBBING by Meggs

    With Casey Fields basking in sunshine, an enthusiastic throng of young Demons fans formed a guard of honour for the evergreen and much admired 75-gamer Paxy Paxman. As the home team ran out to play, Paxy’s banner promised that the Demons would bounce back from last week’s loss to Brisbane and reign supreme.   Disappointingly, the Kangaroos dominated the match to win by 50 points, but our Paxy certainly did her bit.  She was clearly our best player, sweeping well in defence.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 4

    GARNER STRENGTH by Meggs

    In keeping with our tough draw theme, Week 3 sees Melbourne take on flag favourites, North Melbourne, at Casey Fields this Sunday at 1:05pm.  The weather forecast looks dry, a coolish 14 degrees and will be characteristically gusty.  Remember when Casey Fields was considered our fortress?  The Demons have lost two of their past three matches at the Field of Dreams, so opposition teams commute down the Princes Highway with more optimism these days.  The Dees held the highe

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    ALLY’S FIELDS by Meggs

    It was a sunny morning at Casey Fields, as Demon supporters young and old formed a guard of honour for fan favourite and 50-gamer Alyssa Bannan.  Banno’s banner stated the speedster was the ‘fastest 50 games’ by an AFLW player ever.   For Dees supporters, today was not our day and unfortunately not for Banno either. A couple of opportunities emerged for our number 6 but alas there was no sizzle.   Brisbane atoned for last week’s record loss to North Melbourne, comprehensively out

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...