Jump to content

Featured Replies

Absolutely rotten luck for JJ.

 

 
11 minutes ago, BDA said:

Just rotten luck. His contributions over the past 2 seasons deserve a medallion. It's for cases like this that I think medallions should be considered for players that don't make the granny, say for those that played 15 or more games over the course of the year

I guess he did get one last year as an unused sub.

Not really the same though.

13 minutes ago, BDA said:

Just rotten luck. His contributions over the past 2 seasons deserve a medallion. It's for cases like this that I think medallions should be considered for players that don't make the granny, say for those that played 15 or more games over the course of the year

Pretty lucky that he bagged one last year, despite not playing in the Grand Final

 
3 hours ago, BigFez said:

I have nothing to offer this thread except I hope we smash the academy cheating b@stards I can’t stand them.

As you were. 

Try to grow up you'll be much happier


1 minute ago, CYB said:

Who played the defensive wing against the Lions?

Harmes played majority wing I think?

1 minute ago, adonski said:

Harmes played majority wing I think?

Yeah Harmes, worked a treat too. 

7 minutes ago, Seraph said:

I guess he did get one last year as an unused sub.

Not really the same though.

 

7 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

Pretty lucky that he bagged one last year, despite not playing in the Grand Final

Didn't realise he got one. 

So you can get one without actually playing in the granny. In this instance i'm not against it

 

 
7 minutes ago, layzie said:

Yeah Harmes, worked a treat too. 

Wouldn't be totally shocked if we defaulted back to last years set up with Brayshaw on the wing

Heartbreak for JJ. Salem in, Jordon out. Shuffle the magnets to make it happen?


1 hour ago, IRW said:

Try to grow up you'll be much happier

Thanks for the advice champ I'll take it on board.

3 hours ago, BDA said:

 

Didn't realise he got one. 

So you can get one without actually playing in the granny. In this instance i'm not against it

 

Absolutely ridiculous that you can get a medal for not playing in a GF. I just don’t understand it. If you pay 24 games and not the GF and you don’t get a medal


Everyone saying out JJ in Salem and “reshuffle the magnets”… didn’t JJ play as sub last game? 

43 minutes ago, homsar said:

Everyone saying out JJ in Salem and “reshuffle the magnets”… didn’t JJ play as sub last game? 

Yes. So the magnets can just sit there.

22 minutes ago, rpfc said:

Yes. So the magnets can just sit there.

So Bowey the sub?

3 hours ago, dee-tox said:

So Bowey the sub?

Or Bedford with his experience as coming on as a sub?


9 minutes ago, The Lobster Effect said:

Or Bedford with his experience as coming on as a sub?

Bedford makes more sense as a sub than bowey.

As you note, he's been a sub multiple times, which can only help as it must be tricky to be in the right headspace when you don't know when, or even if, you might come on.

And the fact he has the experience of coming on as sub and performing well is important too. 

But the key factor is Toby is more versatile in terms of the positions he could cover. He has experience playing as a small forward, as a nibbler style half forward and also as a mid (his main role at Casey).

Whereas i think i'm right in saying Bowey has only played at HB in the ones and at Casey.

16 hours ago, adonski said:

Harmes played majority wing I think?

He started on Zach Bailey to many of us suprisiing but as the game wore on it seemed as though Goody decided to match his gun midfielder , Gus,  toe to toe with Neale, forcing Neale to be accountable - which he wasn't at times - and Harmes did a great connecting job on his wing and controlled Bailey.

One of the better coaching signs from Goody i thought.

Smith would be my choice of sub

If we lose a small to medium we can cover but the loss of a tall upsets the balance.

Dunstan is another possibility

 
12 minutes ago, binman said:

Bedford makes more sense as a sub than bowey.

As you note, he's been a sub multiple times, which can only help as it must be tricky to be in the right headspace when you don't know when, or even if, you might come on.

And the fact he has the experience of coming on as sub and performing well is important too. 

But the key factor is Toby is more versatile in terms of the positions he could cover. He has experience playing as a small forward, as a nibbler style half forward and also as a mid (his main role at Casey).

Whereas i think i'm right in saying Bowey has only played at HB in the ones and at Casey.

Really?

I would thought the guy with finals experience, premiership player and all around better player made more sense..

Bedford as a sub makes zero sense imo. Whilst you say he's played a little bit of mid at Casey, he has not once been used in that position at AFL and nor will he be given an opportunity especially pressure cooker of finals. 

And as for having experience of coming on as a sub. Well he's started off as sub in 12 games this and has only ever come on mid way in only 2 games. Would you say that's actually experience enough?

Between the two, Bowey offers more versatility as he was an elite junior prospect playing as a midfield/half forward.  Not that they will use him in that position anyway if he was to be a sub and come on.

3 players stick out for me as sub options and they are Adam Tomlinson, Joel Smith and Luke Dunstan.

Edited by dazzledavey36

Joel Smith makes the most sense from a versatility point of view as the sub, because if we lose a tall we are stuffed, particularly if we lose a defender.

But there is no doubt that Dunstan, Bowey, Chandler and Bedford are in much better form, have been pushing their case at Casey and deserve a chance. 

Bowey is arguably a best 22 player anyway, so he will most likely be the sub, especially if we are worried that Salem is not 100%


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 276 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 120 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 33 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 252 replies