Changes v Brisbane

[jumbo returns 6,741]

Hogan?

Watts?

No changes?

Edited August 13, 2017 by Grapeviney

[chook fowler 19,459]

Weed, Garlett, Wagner and Garlett will be put under the microscope 

[danielE288 779]

In Watts.

Out Weid.

 

Wagner did enough IMO

[Diamond_Jim 12,588]

Salem unless suspended for Wagner and Watts for Weideman

Garlett has a few credits

Would not be surprised if we rested Petracca and/or Oliver but I hope not.

Cannot see Hogan being ready but perhaps he could  play VFL in the bye week all going well

[DaveyJones'sLocker 647]

Would think frosty would come in to play on hipwood

weid won't play again this season although took Goodwin a long time to drop him earlier this season.

Petracca should be dropped for watts would be happy to see him "rested" 

 

[SFebes 4,884]

In: Salem, Frost (Hipwood)

Out: Wagner, Petracca (rested).

Following week, Hogan and Watts back.

Edited August 13, 2017 by SFebey

[jumbo returns 6,741]

8 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

Weed, Garlett, Wagner and Garlett will be put under the microscope 

Did you mean CP? 

[leave it to deever 17,511]

8 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

Weed, Garlett, Wagner and Garlett will be put under the microscope 

Surley not both Garletts

[Damo 3,356]

Out: Weideman.

In: Frost, (Tmac forward).

[jacey 333]

would give weid another go at lesser experienced lions.

No change. 

[homsar 431]

I thought Wagner did some really good things and made some great decisions, especially in the first quarter. Why no love for him? Must admit I rarely notice his defending being much chop, which I guess is his main job. 

[Bitter but optimistic 22,241]

Weid out

Watts in

Petracca ? A rest might just sharpen him up.

Jeffy is forgiven this week but needs to fire up against Brisbane.

[Demon Jack 6,909]

Out: Wagner

In: Salem (if free to play)

Happy to let Weid have a crack at a bit more of an inexperienced side. He showed some ok signs today. 

[chook fowler 19,459]

28 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

Surley not both Garletts

I meant Petracca. Put it down to post win delerium

[Deestroy All 14,266]

Watts, no thanks. Earn it.

[leave it to deever 17,511]

Would love to have another big bodied player like Stevie J or Mumford....a ruckman that can play forward.

Hopefully, we can get someone for next year. Another Pedo like player who knows how to throw his weight around.

Edited August 13, 2017 by leave it to deever

[spirit of norm smith 16,460]

Ins. Kennedy Watts

out. Weideman Petracca (rested)

[Straight Sets Simon 23,113]

If Salem is available I'd like to see him in for Vince.

 

[Nasher 33,616]

No change.

[david_neitz_is_my_dad 4,083]

FFS watts in???? What the actual [censored]!! And if he plays soft? Recall Weidman and the cycle continues? 

 

Watts did did nothing for an AFL player playing VFL and people want him back, what message does that send? 

Makes Watts earn it, weeds atleast goes hard. 

[Demon Dynasty 17,109]

52 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

Surley not both Garletts

 Chook was correct ....there are two...but only when he is ON!

[Adzman 2,154]

Out: Weed Wagner

In: Watts Frost

Honestly, if this thread had been up at 3 qtr time I would have added Hannan to the outs. Hannan was HUGE when it counted most. Wagner was ok, I just think Brisbane are tall down forward and need a plan B if the MacBrothers struggle on them.

[david_neitz_is_my_dad 4,083]

Petracca has now done nothing 3 games in a row also. Either we rest him or risk another downer by playing him against Brisbane in which he could explode into form

[leave it to deever 17,511]

1 minute ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

FFS watts in???? What the actual [censored]!! And if he plays soft? Recall Weidman and the cycle continues? 

 

Watts did did nothing for an AFL player playing VFL and people want him back, what message does that send? 

Makes Watts earn it, weeds atleast goes hard. 

3

Nah...Watts not trying much is still much better than Weids best,

On that basis its better if hes in.

B4 anyone says its rewarding lack of effort....Remember that jacks form b4 he was rushed back in was very good.

 

[Guest]

Jack Watts comes back in if he had an absolute blinder for Casey. If he didn't, he stays there.

I don't want Clayton's omissions like we had in the Neeld era where we would send blokes to the magoos 'as a lesson' for 'not trying'.

You kick down the door for your spot in the team or you don't get in. Simple.