Jump to content

Maynard must get at least four weeks

Previously known as LITD.
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

If he doesn't  get a serious  suspension it will be open slather on pretending  to smother and then knocking people out.

I'm not saying this was his intent ( but how do we really know) the fact remains Gus was stretchered off after a player launched into him like an f16.

We can never really know ones true intent but the results are irrefutable. 

# ProtecttheheadHoliday4Maynard

Edited by leave it to deever

    • Like 13
    • Thanks 1
    • Love 1
    • Clap 4
     

    I suspect he intentionally turned his body to inflict damage but they'll argue he was in the air to smother then braced in a split second decision. He'll get off.

    • Like 6

    He can’t get off. 

    Head high.

    High impact.

    Thats 2 weeks.

    Intentional or accidental is all that’s up for debate, so he gets 2-4 weeks. 2 weeks is the minimum possible outcome.

    Fantastic he will miss a flag!

    • Like 9
    • Love 1
     

    Going to leave the AFL community in mass confusion if Maynard gets cleared.

    I get that it was a football incident rather an off the ball act of thuggery, but he could be held accountable for a severe impact.

     

     

    • Like 1
    6 minutes ago, Nascent said:

    I suspect he intentionally turned his body to inflict damage but they'll argue he was in the air to smother then braced in a split second decision. He'll get off.

    Absolutely. Roo might only get one week, to stop the screaming after Maynard gets off.

    One bloke unconscious, who has had a problem with concussions. The other victim jumps up and keeps playing.

    Remember Kozzies 2 weeks for jumping up and bumping and Bailey Smith laughed.

    Which team did Christian play for?

     

    • Like 4
    • Clap 1
    • Vomit 2

    10 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

    If he doesn't  get a serious  suspension it will be open slather on pretending  to smother and then knocking people out.

    I'm not saying this was his intent ( but how do we really know) the fact remains Gus was stretchered off after a player launched into him like an f16.

    We can never really know ones true intent but the results are irrefutable. 

    # ProtecttheheadHoliday4Maynard

    Agreed!

     

    It was a dog act by Maynard.

    He is a vile [censored]! 🤬🤬🤬

     

    • Like 5

    Confident the MRO will send it to the tribunal, he’ll cop a 3 week suspension by the tribunal and then the Pies will get him off on appeal.

    Nothing surer.

    Meanwhile we’re a key midfielder down next week.

    • Like 5
    • Love 1
    • Angry 1
    • Vomit 2

    MRO is a lottery. Who knows what they’ll decide 

    • Like 3
     

    It's bloody obvious, especially after he turned his body to get the shoulder in the head and off the ground, shouldn't matter if it was the front.... so that won't mean anthing and he might get off.

    I just hope Gus is alright.

    • Like 3

    I hate the argument it’s a football act, well so is tackling and if you get that wrong and knock someone out your gone this is no different 

    • Like 16
    • Clap 2

    He’ll get off. Then we’ll get to hear all the Collingwood idiots praising his toughness. 

    • Angry 2

    Late

    head high

    severe impact

    feet are off ground

    duty of care - zero

    • Like 17
    • Clap 2

    The fact that the media interviewed that [censored] after the game to allow him the temerity to suggest what he did was a ‘footy act’ is [censored]. 

    • Like 12
    • Clap 2
    • Vomit 1

    He rolled the right shoulder in, he had a choice, could have rolled left, guilty as don't care about post facto BS.

    • Like 7
    • Love 1

    I can’t stand the pandering by TV media to the largest audience. It’s as if they think we are too thick to realise it’s happening. 

    • Like 4
    • Love 1

    It all comes down to duty of care - he showed none and head high plus high impact makes everything else redundant.  That's 2 weeks and that's all he needs to finish his season. 

    • Like 3
    5 minutes ago, OhMyDees said:

    The fact that the media interviewed that [censored] after the game to allow him the temerity to suggest what he did was a ‘footy act’ is [censored]. 

    How faaarrked was that!

    🤬

    • Like 2
    • Angry 1
    1 minute ago, whatwhat say what said:

    will not be suspended

    and if he is will get off on appeal

    Yep, MRO may give it 2 weeks, Careless/High/High

    But other similar ones got off, Cripps, Duncan

    The only thing against Maynard is the shoulder turn, not the best look and not a move to avoid contact, moreso make it hurt.  But I thought Cripps was worse and he got off albeit after long appeal process


    4 minutes ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

    Yep, MRO may give it 2 weeks, Careless/High/High

    But other similar ones got off, Cripps, Duncan

    The only thing against Maynard is the shoulder turn, not the best look and not a move to avoid contact, moreso make it hurt.  But I thought Cripps was worse and he got off albeit after long appeal process

    cos the filth don't play for a fortnight - the [censored]! - the afl can string it out for a week

    think of the content?!??

    i love the smell of seo in the morning

     
    4 minutes ago, Bates Mate said:

    Him and cox are thugs out there to try hurt blokes and get away with  too much. 

    I think even Cox tried to.twist Petraccas ankle during a play where we has laying on the turf and for whatever reason hold Trac's leg and then put his weight on it. Luckily Trac was fine.

    • Like 4
    • Vomit 4

    I hope we send in a harsh medical report with a long history of Gus’ concussion injuries, which are very clear to everyone.  That helmet is not a fashion statement. 

    I hope Gus will be ok. He was previously one head knock away from retirement. 

    • Clap 3
    • Sad 1

    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 133 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Like
      • 385 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Clap
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All