Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Well no smoking meat for me today... Not unless they let me drag the big girl into the MCG

 :roos:

Despite the changes, and the potential for more I'm still not worried. You don't play individuals now you play a system

Dee's by 17

 

 

 

System or soldiers?  Today we will learn a lot about how deep we run with both.  Dees by 36.

Hawks may actually play their normal game against us which may mean an open game.

They are a real chance.

 

Well I'm happy to say I'll be going to the footy in daylight - at least for a short while. I had therefore, planned to return to The Manor at a decent hour but as I'm meeting with a couple of Demonland lunatics, the post game libations could be my Boozerloo .

As to the forced changes ...... well you always want to go in with your best team but .....footy being footy, that rarely happens. 

Despite that, we are still putting a bloody good outfit on the 'G that will squash the Hawks without overmuch bother. However, that statement is subject to review, if we lose ( touch giant tree) anymore pre game.

Will have eyes on Bedford of course but Tmac must realise he's under pressure so he will be having a decent crack. Milkshake as a late in provides another point of interest .

The skies are clear (ish) in Romsey, so I'm tipping decent conditions tonight, which may give Weid and BBB a chance to grab a couple

Adversity often brings out the best, so on the punt, I'm going for Dees 40+ and I'll try and find a decent goals/possesions multi to go with it.

My ungrateful domestic staff still haven't returned from their free camping trip ( maybe they're having difficulty  unpitching their tents) so The Manor is a bleak and lonely place currently.  

Dees winning streak to continue.


This game has suddenly got a lot more interesting. No doubt covid protocols have evened up the odds but we are still going in with a strong team

Looking forward to seeing how our system holds up with all the changes in personnel. Losing Kossie and Nibbler will impact our forward half pressure but hopefully Bedford can bring some heat to compensate

I’m bringing my boy along to his first game. He’s excited and so am I

Despite the changes we’ll win

Dees by 25 points

In a old fashioned shoot out Dees still win in what will be an entertaining clash! 

I’m mentally preparing myself for the fact that we might be flat, with all the COVID in the group. No doubt in my mind there’s at least one player playing who has it and doesn’t know it yet.

The side still looks strong on paper though. I’m still pretty confident we should get the job done easily, but the sheen of invincibility I had earlier in the week has gone.

 

Jane Bunn lied to me all week. the skies are clear with no rain forecast today. 

a drier footy suits us

uncertainty leading into the game is not ideal. Anyone with a scratchy throat will be thinking they have the Vid. 1/4 of the team out in one week is a concern. I am most concerned about our run and pressure fwd of the ball with Kozzi and ANB out. Melksham is not a runner or a pressure player

hawks by 8pts

For all the doom and gloom this week " Covid" we have been back in to win. Dee's now $1.18 Hawks $5.00 


If we win the fear meter from other teams will go thru the roof! :cool:

All we need from Bedford and Melksham is tackle, tackle, tackle and keep the ball in our f50.  Others can kick the goals.

Still thinking dees 3-5 goals.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

Great structure and game plan, the quality of your best 6 players and the depth of your bottom 6 is usually what wins games.

Unless we lose more today we are still in a good position particularly if it stays dry. 

We’ll probably still win as we seem to have forgotten how to lose! Dees by 20

It will be close at half time.

Then we flick the switch. 

Its generous  of us to let them think they are a chance for a while.

Edited by leave it to deever

Coming over from Hobart today for this. Was hoping to sit Level 4 Ponsford but seems it is closed. Where will @binman sit?


30 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

If we win the fear meter from other teams will go thru the roof! :cool:

All we need from Bedford and Melksham is tackle, tackle, tackle and keep the ball in our f50.  Others can kick the goals.

Still thinking dees 3-5 goals.

Top post.

I'm confident Beford will be ok.  Melk has a bit to prove and should do so if sensible.

Your'e first comment on the fear factor will be fascinating to watch if we do win.

relaxed with Yze and Williams and others on the case also.

Edited by Demon17

7 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Coming over from Hobart today for this. Was hoping to sit Level 4 Ponsford but seems it is closed. Where will @binman sit?

Coming down from NSW today, my second game for the year  Should win despite the outs. Good to hear the rain has cleared

37 minutes ago, Mr Steve said:

For all the doom and gloom this week " Covid" we have been back in to win. Dee's now $1.18 Hawks $5.00 

Those are ridiculous odds. 

We won’t know how much more impact Covid has had on the team until the bounce. More late outs could throw us into disarray as it’s not like we can plan for possible outs if we know someone is under an injury cloud. 
We also have no idea how much losing Kosi and ANB will impact the team. That’s two of our key pressure players forward of the centre. 
Hawks are fast and will play an open game. They will make mistakes but they can also hurt us on the counterattack if they move it quickly. 
There is no doubt this is a danger game. 

1 hour ago, Josh said:

Well no smoking meat for me today... Not unless they let me drag the big girl into the MCG

 :roos:

Despite the changes, and the potential for more I'm still not worried. You don't play individuals now you play a system

Dee's by 17

 

 

@Josh disappointing. As a fellow meat smoker I am shocked and dismayed at this brazen display of not pregame smoking meat.

 

Smoke some meat during the day today. Take the meat with you my dear boy. Why not add the hot meat fresh out of thermocontainer to your charcuterie board. I mean you are a Melbourne member...

:goody2:

 


This is going to be really interesting. I’m not at all sure how our system will stack up in the face of so many outs, including the coach. If we can get the job done this will be an incredible shot in the arm for an already confident group.

 Of the ins Melksham is the biggest worry for me. He has form for underwhelming pressure although I will admit he looked pretty good for Casey last week. Regardless, there is no way he can cover the distance to fill holes that nibbler regularly does.

  • Author
2 minutes ago, Sideshow Bob said:

@Josh disappointing. As a fellow meat smoker I am shocked and dismayed at this brazen display of not pregame smoking meat.

 

Smoke some meat during the day today. Take the meat with you my dear boy. Why not add the hot meat fresh out of thermocontainer to your charcuterie board. I mean you are a Melbourne member...

:goody2:

 

There is so much Melbourne in this post it's gone past ironic and back to true snobbery... And I love it.

 

Down from the Vic/NSW border and I can tell that when I even hinted of the $85 jumbuck rotisserie making the trip with us I was met with a glare to rival the crows 2017 finals efforts.

The boss if off to the dfo and me and the kids have discovered a German meat house, just patiently waiting for it to open now.

I'll hit up Alexander's for a celebratory stogie and we're laughing. Staying in Fitzroy though, can't find a Carlton draught anywhere...

:mahoney2:

 

When is the last time Bedford played a full game? Been the sub 3 times this year? Not good preparation for the kid, hope he goes alright but I won’t be judging him too harshly once he chases hard

#AxeTheSub


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies