Jump to content

Featured Replies

Disappointing day, flat all over the place and delivery into the f50 was poor.

At the end of the day people were speculating what round Goodwin would lose his job this season, weโ€™re going into the bye with 2 losses

Little rest and hopefully a kick Up the backside for the players. Get Viney and BBB into the team and we go again.ย 

ย 

I knew this would happen, I just knew it.ย 

That was their grandfinal, and we didnt show up.ย 

ย 

ย 

Flat, flat, flat.

Never looked likely today. Countless players down on form. A slight throwback to previous years with players like Oliver and Petracca trying too hard and getting caught instead of taking the first option.

Kudos to JJ and Jackson who tried hard all day.

Credit to Collingwood. Pressure was outstanding for the whole game.

 

Flat over the entire ground.ย 

Selfish mid-field led by Trac and Oliver whose continual free choice not to give first option but go for the glory ball rears its ugly head from time to time.ย 

And I've got an idea! Kick it long to Fritsch verses 2 tall players ALL day.


3 minutes ago, Redleg said:

They wouldnโ€™t go near him off todayโ€™s game.

But he was one of their best players!

I can stomach a loss if the effort is there

Seems like we drank a bit of our own kool aid and didnt' switch onย 

Weed has to go ASAP

He isn't up to it and we need BBB inย 

ย 

You know they were going to come out for Buckley. The players must understand that and still they weren't switched on. So much talent and yet so dumb at time.ย 

ย 

That stings.ย 

The absolute arrogance of thinking we could carry Weid thinking he'd magically turn good .For all BBB does wrong there's one thing he does constantly and that's kick goals.ย 

Two weeks to savour that performance now. [censored].ย 

ย 

My 2 observations:

1. If I was Buckley, Iโ€™d be furious. Where has that level of intensity been for them all year?ย Iโ€™ve seen a fair bit of their footy and their tackling intensity and ball use was horrific. They choose when to go, and it was us unfortunately.ย 

2.ย We looked very flat all game. Not clean, constantly fumbling, and not bringing our team mates into the game with first options. I donโ€™t mind if the press come for us now. We need a rocket, and 2 weeks to reset and focus on what we want to be.

Scoreboard flattered us. That was a weak weak weak effort today.

Teams have worked us out now. Yes weโ€™ve been able to grind out some great wind, but our defense has been worked out. Short kick and run to stop interceptions and we struggle.

Our leaders didnโ€™t stand up today when they needed to. There was definitely air of canโ€™t be bothered, can turn it on for 10 minutes later and win. Nup. Sorry. In this competition, no game is done until itโ€™s done. Put in the effort or youโ€™ll lose. Hopefully they learnt the lesson today and had the Hollywood [censored] knocked out of them.ย 

This is more like what have been dished up in the past - a lazy, insipid brain dead performance. Buckley out coached Goodwin comprehensively.ย 

3 minutes ago, Undeeterred said:

Oh come on. Weโ€™ve won 11 games for goodness sake. You canโ€™t win every week itโ€™s just not realistic.ย 

True. Itโ€™s not the loss, itโ€™s the manner of the loss. Same as how we played vs North for a big chunk of the game.ย 


That was putrid, and people still wonder why we donโ€™t all trust this team still.ย 

6 minutes ago, ProperDee said:

Weideman has gone down into the Collingwood rooms toย practice the club song.

I'm not going to justify the way Weideman played today but our entire forward line was dysfunctional. It gave many memories of 2019, when we were dominating inside 50s but not taking any of our chances. Yes, Weideman needs to lift against Essendon if he keeps his spotย but you can say the same about all the other forwards.

We got smashed out the middle. We really need Viney back. With him in today I think we would have won!

Poor effort all round. Another loss to a bottom side, god knows what we will look like after the bye. So miserable that we came out looking like this, could easily sense it coming. We are not contenders losing games like this.


Weid out. Fritta, Kozzie, and Tommy were non existent. Spargo seemed the most lively but Quaynor was way too dominant. Our forwards really were so far off the pace.ย 

Meanwhile our much loved midfield was absolutely beaten, Pies still have some quality (which would be frustrating if you were a Pies fan) and they stepped up. Petracca (aside from a couple of good cameo moments) wasnโ€™t close to 50% of his best, Oliver was well held and clearly roughed up through the match. Gawn had an up and down game but aside from his 3rd quarter would rate his day as very average.ย 

LJ was the only player Iโ€™d say gave an effort all game, heโ€™s definitely got a special quality to him.

I know theyโ€™reย different types of players but boy you put him next to Weid and you just have to shake your head. I donโ€™t write players off but Weid is now at the bottom of the BBB/M Brown/Weid pack after that pathetic performance.ย 

The whole footy world has been waiting for the โ€œold Melbourneโ€. On one of our biggest days of the year they returned, but hereโ€™s the good news: they players have two weeks to stew and be ****ed about it. Return after the bye breathing fire, I have a feeling the media will be loving this.ย 

Edited by Pates

Obviously our worst game for a long time.

Nothing we did today resembled our 11-1 start. We were slow, fumbly, unstructured, second to the ball, lazy.ย You have to think there's something wrong with how we approach and/or prepare for games against weak sides. Our worst games for the year have all been against bottom 4 sides - our two losses were to sides who, at the time, were in the bottom 4, and our next two worst games were against North and Hawthorn.ย 

Old habits returned. We were +7 in inside 50s but -7 for scoring shots.

An indefensible game from Weideman. That change must be made. We cannot carry players as awful as that, particularly in our forward line. Petty was horrendous in the first half on Mihocek which forced us to switch Lever over, but that wrecked our back half structure as Lever couldn't peel off.

The game was there to be won for us in the third quarter. We had all the momentum and all the inside 50s, but the three goals we kicked wasn't enough. How many times did Brayshaw get it on the near-side flank but kick it on his left? Low percentage stuff that we couldn't afford. And then TMac's third quarter miss from dead in front was a momentum shifter - would have put us a goal in front and would have been our fourth straight goal in that quarter, but from that miss they kicked 5.3 to our 2.4.

It's easy to panic and throw the baby out with the bathwater,ย but we're 11-2 so it's not exactly a disaster. After the Carlton win when we hit 9-0 we knew we had a tough month, so to come out of it 2-2 isn't a bad result. It's also better to drop these games to bottom sides rather than to our competitors: If we had to go 2-2, it's better this way than the other way.

Iโ€™m disappointed and yet not in the least surprised. For a team that has achieved absolutely nothing, to pick and choose when to turn up to games and when not to turn up just shows our immaturity. We have come on in leaps and bounds this year, but teams with no killer instinct donโ€™t win flags.
Weโ€™ve cruised to too many mediocre wins over bottom teams and have now lost twice due to coming out flat and expecting to win. We barely lifted out of first gear even in the second half.ย 
This loss will probably cost us a top 2 finish. I hope that burns them.ย 
A terrible ending to another depressing weekend in the city of Covid.ย 

Edited by Jaded

ย 
3 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Scoreboard flattered us. That was a weak weak weak effort today.

Teams have worked us out now. Yes weโ€™ve been able to grind out some great wind, but our defense has been worked out. Short kick and run to stop interceptions and we struggle.

Our leaders didnโ€™t stand up today when they needed to. There was definitely air of canโ€™t be bothered, can turn it on for 10 minutes later and win. Nup. Sorry. In this competition, no game is done until itโ€™s done. Put in the effort or youโ€™ll lose. Hopefully they learnt the lesson today and had the Hollywood [censored] knocked out of them.ย 

Geelong, Brisbane and the Bulldogs, AKA the rest of the top four, havenโ€™t been able to. Or Richmond


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Mondayโ€™s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from eitherโ€™s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demonsโ€™ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thumb Down
      • Haha
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last yearโ€™s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Clubโ€™s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.ย Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Letโ€™s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the teamโ€™s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and โ€ฆ it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterdayโ€™s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourneโ€™s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldnโ€™t get any worse. Well, it did. And whatโ€™s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasnโ€™t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyonโ€™s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourneโ€™s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourneโ€™s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterdayโ€™s 7 goals 21 behinds.ย 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. Iโ€™ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?ย Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?ย 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 528 replies