Flat Track Bullies?

[Demonland 72,230]

 

[ArtificialWisdom 4,045]

I'd love to be flat track bullies... problem is we are just as likely to lose to Carlton as we are to Richmond...

[Wiseblood 24,637]

Is there anything about the club the media hasn't covered this week...?

[Gator 17,383]

Frawley is a $%#@carter.

[Delusional demon 82 1,197]

We would actually need to thump a couple of bottom teams , we’re lucky enough if we just get over the line . 

Our biggest winning margin last year was under 10 goals , hence one of the main reasons our % was not flash 

[Sir Why You Little 37,052]

Frawley was good player in an absolute shite team

Why does he get to judge anything?

[McQueen 17,865]

Clearly it’s @Demonland site but fair dinkum are you on the SEN payroll?

SEN articles are the most flimsy non-value adding rubbish I’ve read for some time!

Why keep promoting it?

Spud Frawley?

Really?

Great site but I’ll not financially contribute any longer if this keeps up.

[Wiseblood 24,637]

8 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Clearly it’s @Demonland site but fair dinkum are you on the SEN payroll?

SEN articles are the most flimsy non-value adding rubbish I’ve read for some time!

Why keep promoting it?

Spud Frawley?

Really?

Great site but I’ll not financially contribute any longer if this keeps up.

I kind of agree McQueen in regards to the amount of articles that keep getting added.

I feel almost burnt out discussing so many different things and it's only Round 5.

[monoccular 17,432]

Definitely not flat track bullies since we haven’t been able to bully anyone, even Kangaroos or Bears.

[Demonland 72,230]

42 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Clearly it’s @Demonland site but fair dinkum are you on the SEN payroll?

SEN articles are the most flimsy non-value adding rubbish I’ve read for some time!

Why keep promoting it?

Spud Frawley?

Really?

Great site but I’ll not financially contribute any longer if this keeps up.

 

33 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

I kind of agree McQueen in regards to the amount of articles that keep getting added.

I feel almost burnt out discussing so many different things and it's only Round 5.

 I'll make no apologies for posting topics about the Dees in the media for discussion here. No one is forcing you to read or comment. 

[markc 975]

sorry which side have we put away ? 

[McQueen 17,865]

27 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

 I'll make no apologies for posting topics about the Dees in the media for discussion here. No one is forcing you to read or comment. 

That’s cool mate.

If you think everything you list as thread-worthy is worth discussion then you’re having trouble understanding your paid up Demonland members.

[RalphiusMaximus 6,076]

2 hours ago, ArtificialWisdom said:

I'd love to be flat track bullies... problem is we are just as likely to lose to Carlton as we are to Richmond...

Agree with this.  We're terrible when we're favorites and play well when we should lose. 

[Demonland 72,230]

1 hour ago, McQueen said:

That’s cool mate.

If you think everything you list as thread-worthy is worth discussion then you’re having trouble understanding your paid up Demonland members.

Happy to refund you. Send me your PayPal details via PM. 

[McQueen 17,865]

10 hours ago, Demonland said:

Happy to refund you. Send me your PayPal details via PM. 

Keep the funds.

I’ll attempt to navigate the site better.

[beelzebub 23,380]

12 hours ago, Demonland said:

 

 I'll make no apologies for posting topics about the Dees in the media for discussion here. No one is forcing you to read or comment. 

Nor probably should you..Your site do what you like. Suprised you take umbrage .

The obsevation that such articles are trite if not tripe also probably valid.

I dont know...maybe preface title with Warning.. rubbish article to follow...or simply paranthesise (sen)

Then some might happily read another thread.

[ding 5,126]

Site owner posts a link to an article about our club........

Site members complain about not just article itself, but also the value of the post.....

what the ?

If this site was edited for quality of content, 99% of posts would disappear.

ffs guys, if you dont like the message in the article, argue its merit. We are going to be talked about a LOT as expectations continue to rise, but our performances dont.

Play on.

 

 

[Ethan Tremblay 30,876]

An odd thing to say, we’re far from flat track bullies. 

 

[Diamond_Jim 12,596]

Agree Ding

we need to shape the message by performing and playing an attractive brand of football.

If you want the opposite have a look at how badly Carlton and St Kilda will perform media and finance wise this year.

[Demon Dynasty 17,109]

We got bullied by the Hawks and as everyone has already pointed out we haven't put lessor teams to the sword in what seems like an eternity.

SEN will put anything out there for a story.  Spud must be on his own crappy home made Vodka!  

Nothing to see here!

[Sir Why You Little 37,052]

The man is named after a Potato ? 

enough said

[Pates 9,660]

Port were “flat track bullies” last year, they got through to the second week of the finals. I will take that this year. 

[praha 11,240]

3 minutes ago, Pates said:

Port were “flat track bullies” last year, they got through to the second week of the finals. I will take that this year. 

They didn't, but they did play finals.

[Pates 9,660]

7 hours ago, praha said:

They didn't, but they did play finals.

Sorry you’re right, the eagles got the after the siren goal. Still they made finals, better than us. 

I guess I’m saying I could live with us winning every game we were expecting to win and then pinching a game or two against a quality side. 

Still too early to tell what any team is. 

[McQueen 17,865]

On 21/04/2018 at 8:38 AM, ding said:

Site owner posts a link to an article about our club........

Site members complain about not just article itself, but also the value of the post.....

what the ?

If this site was edited for quality of content, 99% of posts would disappear.

ffs guys, if you dont like the message in the article, argue its merit. We are going to be talked about a LOT as expectations continue to rise, but our performances dont.

Play on.

 

 

If you’ve not noticed the change in tact of recent then you’ve been asleep at the wheel, ding.

I’m a life member and have made other financial contributions. I’m not boasting but rather just adding fact.

I enjoy the site and the great insight other supporters post regularly.

There’s been some great threads we’ve all contributed to over the years but all of a sudden we’re inundated with article after pointless article about about the club and certain players that in my opinion have close to zero value with reference to discussion.

And then I get a “happy to refund you” response when I air a grievance?

Wow.