Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, DeeZone said:

That is the burning question Dee Boys, we know that three of them are on the rise, we need another three to show their worth next year and the other three to be ready to roll in ‘26. It all comes down to development, we need to snag a great forward & ruck coach asap. We do not want to waste these youngsters.😁

Somewhere in between never and not once. 

 

At least he'll come to the club as hungry as Dirk Diggler was to conquer the adult film world.

He's worth bringing in for his name alone. Imagine jack dyer mangling this? “Wide Dickslam”.

Edited by Queanbeyan Demon

 
17 hours ago, Dee Boys said:

Whilst not disagreeing, how many of these are actually any good? Or good enough for us to challenge for premierships?

We will find out first in 2025, then 2026. 

23 hours ago, Demons11 said:

 

That’s the point I asked you?

Do you know any thing about Wade? You ignored the question! 

You just goofed of with an ill informed comment with no knowledge. 

No he hasn’t played an AFL game yet in 2 and a half years so he a dozen matches ahead of Matty Jefferson in time. 

Reading the reports on his VFL games, and his roles of forward back and ruck he also has are similar to JVR who is in his third year this year and has played in junior state and now AFL/VFL in those 3 positions. 

He played one  season of VFL Jeffo now 2, so we can get a gauge from both their progress with a little bit of goal scoring also he sounds like a good very early 20 plus at 190cm odd recruit. 

He is NOT bottom of the barrel !

Perhaps our mid year recruiting of Luker Kentfield is far more project orientated and could possibly apply to your remark. 

And he won’t come with a huge price tag perhaps an early third rounder. 

So let’s see he has asked for a trade to us and who is more accurate in his ability and suitability for our list and team. 

 


 


On 23/09/2024 at 22:31, Skuit said:

Double-Dutch up front with Derksen and Van Rooyen. Enter your puns here: 

De Vliegende Hollanders

(The Flying Dutchmen)

3 hours ago, 58er said:

That’s the point I asked you?

Do you know any thing about Wade? You ignored the question! 

You just goofed of with an ill informed comment with no knowledge. 

No he hasn’t played an AFL game yet in 2 and a half years so he a dozen matches ahead of Matty Jefferson in time. 

Reading the reports on his VFL games, and his roles of forward back and ruck he also has are similar to JVR who is in his third year this year and has played in junior state and now AFL/VFL in those 3 positions. 

He played one  season of VFL Jeffo now 2, so we can get a gauge from both their progress with a little bit of goal scoring also he sounds like a good very early 20 plus at 190cm odd recruit. 

He is NOT bottom of the barrel !

Perhaps our mid year recruiting of Luker Kentfield is far more project orientated and could possibly apply to your remark. 

And he won’t come with a huge price tag perhaps an early third rounder. 

So let’s see he has asked for a trade to us and who is more accurate in his ability and suitability for our list and team. 

 


 

I did not goof off and absolutely have enough insights to know he is not going to improve us.  

 

We can send them Tomlinson back?

They might relent if they sign Stringer, I can see why they wouldn’t give up a contracted player unless they’re bringing talent in.

Already losing Cumming, Perryman and perhaps Peatling.

Do we shift focus to Conor Stone?

24 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

Summary

  • Liam Baker has chosen the Eagles as his preferred club and is expected to be traded for pick 13, if the Eagles secure it in a trade for Tom Barrass (likely heading to Hawthorn).
  • Jack Graham will join the Eagles on a four-year deal. Richmond offered an improved contract but now must wait for free agency compensation, which could be up to $700,000 for an end-of-first-round pick.
  • Kamdyn McIntosh is waiting on Richmond's decision regarding his future.
  • Richmond is losing multiple premiership players this season, including Dustin Martin, Marlion Pickett, Dylan Grimes, Daniel Rioli, Shai Bolton, Liam Baker, and Jack Graham.
  • The Eagles are assessing key defenders on the market, with Tom Clurey, Lewis Young, and Denver Grainger-Barras exploring new options.
  • Greater Western Sydney (GWS) is determined to keep contracted players Xavier O'Halloran and Wade Derksen despite interest from the Bulldogs and Demons.
  • GWS has picks 14, 34, and 39 and will get a compensation pick for Isaac Cumming (joining Adelaide).
  • Harry Perryman is expected to leave GWS for the Pies, with Port Adelaide missing out on both him and Cumming.
  • GWS believes James Peatling is likely to stay but is still considering offers from other clubs.
  • Jake Stringer has been linked to GWS due to connections with Jason McCartney.
  • Dan Houston is keen to join Carlton, but North Melbourne's future first-rounder offer makes the Blues’ task difficult.

34 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

Summary

  • Liam Baker has chosen the Eagles as his preferred club and is expected to be traded for pick 13, if the Eagles secure it in a trade for Tom Barrass (likely heading to Hawthorn).
  • Jack Graham will join the Eagles on a four-year deal. Richmond offered an improved contract but now must wait for free agency compensation, which could be up to $700,000 for an end-of-first-round pick.
  • Kamdyn McIntosh is waiting on Richmond's decision regarding his future.
  • Richmond is losing multiple premiership players this season, including Dustin Martin, Marlion Pickett, Dylan Grimes, Daniel Rioli, Shai Bolton, Liam Baker, and Jack Graham.
  • The Eagles are assessing key defenders on the market, with Tom Clurey, Lewis Young, and Denver Grainger-Barras exploring new options.
  • Greater Western Sydney (GWS) is determined to keep contracted players Xavier O'Halloran and Wade Derksen despite interest from the Bulldogs and Demons.
  • GWS has picks 14, 34, and 39 and will get a compensation pick for Isaac Cumming (joining Adelaide).
  • Harry Perryman is expected to leave GWS for the Pies, with Port Adelaide missing out on both him and Cumming.
  • GWS believes James Peatling is likely to stay but is still considering offers from other clubs.
  • Jake Stringer has been linked to GWS due to connections with Jason McCartney.
  • Dan Houston is keen to join Carlton, but North Melbourne's future first-rounder offer makes the Blues’ task difficult.

Wade Derksen has apparently requested a trade to the Demons.

Whether or not it happens....we shall wait and see?

52 minutes ago, Supreme_Demon said:

Wade Derksen has apparently requested a trade to the Demons.

Whether or not it happens....we shall wait and see?

Hard to hold on to a guy who hasn't been given the chance at senior level and wants to play elsewhere to get that chance

I would hope we play hardball back and let it hang out there. We want him, but fair price. They have enough moving parts to worry about, if it works as a three club trade to get something else done, great. Maybe even work on someone like Ollie lord and let gws know if we land him we won’t want derksen. 

Contracted  so I guess they can play hard ball. 

Playing hard ball means they may in fact rate him despite not playing him.

If they rate him he might actually be ok. If we think he is ok and we want him I guess we need to pay up given he is contracted. 

Edited by Pulp Fritschon


This gets done. You don't hold depth players who want out who aren't likely to get a game next season.

Hogan, Cadman and Ricardi are all options ahead of him already playing. Max Gruzewski got a few games this year too.

8 hours ago, BAMF said:

This gets done. You don't hold depth players who want out who aren't likely to get a game next season.

Hogan, Cadman and Ricardi are all options ahead of him already playing. Max Gruzewski got a few games this year too.

And Callum Brown.

15 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

We can send them Tomlinson back?

They might relent if they sign Stringer, I can see why they wouldn’t give up a contracted player unless they’re bringing talent in.

Already losing Cumming, Perryman and perhaps Peatling.

Do we shift focus to Conor Stone?

No we go after the player who wants to come to us and is best suited to our needs. That's Derksen. 


Future fourth should get it done.

17 minutes ago, BScotti said:

Jason McCartney making it clear on Trade Radio that they expect Wade is staying at GWS

 

Of course.

 
29 minutes ago, BScotti said:

Jason McCartney making it clear on Trade Radio that they expect Wade is staying at GWS

 

The Giants recruited Wade Derksen in the 2022 AFL Mid-Season Rookie Draft so he’s been at the club for 2½ seasons without gaining senior selection. If they think he’s so precious then fine, keep him but really, is there much point?

Just now, Elwood 3184 said:

The Giants recruited Wade Derksen in the 2022 AFL Mid-Season Rookie Draft so he’s been at the club for 2½ seasons without gaining senior selection. If they think he’s so precious then fine, keep him but really, is there much point?

They're into Jake Stringer aren't they? Maybe they're waiting for that to happen before letting WD go.

If we sign him, he needs #40 too, give Taj an upgrade


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 52 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies