Jump to content

Featured Replies

The worse performance by the MFC since the Neeld era. Worse than the Brisbane performance, I am completely embarrassed to be losing to a club in a rebuilding phase.

 

You cannot tell me Ollie Sestan offers less than Billings. Play him. Find out.

It's absolutely laughable that some people think we have depth. We have maybe 18 decent players and the rest are very, very ordinary. 

The failure of Goodwin and Lamb to turn over our many C graders and try to find some diamonds in the rough over the past three years is a massive dereliction of duty. 

 
2 minutes ago, Return to Glory said:

Here's the good news: we now must play Jefferson. We now must give new recruits a game ahead of Billings - i.e. Tholstrup. It's now patently obvious that our current team being selected is lacking.

I'd give that a go.

To all the posters saying a 6-7 goal win was guaranteed/a must - that mentality is exactly why we lost. Because it was shared by this team. We expected to walk up and win, but the Eagles, like every other team know that if you show up and work hard from the first bounce, you can beat us. Which they did, but in truth they humbled us, and we were also embarrassed by a first year player.

Our midfield is non existent. Our backline was woeful. Cant blame Lever, as you cannot say we are nothing without one guy. 

Umpiring didn’t cost us. 

Outmarked and outworked everywhere.

A disgrace. The team wants to talk about earning respect? None. Zero for tonight and last week we did nothing for a whole half+ 

So disappointed. 


Completely dominated across the board. Very few won their matchups tonight.

Could be the last we see of Ben Brown. 

No excuses. WC thoroughly deserved the win and rarely looked in doubt 

 

We lost to a team that has only won 7 games in 3 years

Hang your heads in shame

Goodwin and the selection committee should resign

This isn't hyperbole, our midfield is one of the worst in the competition.

What was once a strength is now a liability.  Big time.

 

Harley Reid took more steps than the Crows player yesterday. Totally inconsistent umpiring.


3 minutes ago, Lou C. Fur said:

Performances like that make you wonder whether you renew a membership...

 Not me. I’m here rain, hail or shine. 

Dees sit 7th and is probably a accurate reflection of how they are going, I said it before the year we weren’t a top 4 side anymore and I think that is been born out the more the year goes on. The window on another flag with this specific list is probably over now and we need to reload and go again with some big trades end of the year. Ala how we got Steven May and Jake Lever originally 

We need a mini rebuild. We have made some shocking list management calls since our flag. 
 - Anyone can see we need a key forward, you cannot tell me we hadn’t been able to land one in 3 [censored] years?

- Grundy was a mess

- We let Jordan go yet bring in Billings? I don’t know about you but we could really use a defensive mid right about now. 

We have stagnated since our flag, our stars are now starting to age. And our midfield are no longer formidable. 
Viney is on the downward slope, Oliver is a shell of him self. Trac seems like he has to do it all. 
 

We have drafted some super kids, we need to top up with some more top end talent whilst our stars and carry them through their first few years and have a tilt at the flag again in 3 years time. 

We just regressed by about 8 years tonight.

Absolute insipid performance against one of the worst teams in the AFL bar about 4 to 5 VG players plus the young gun Reid.

Lost at selection by continuing to play an underdone Petty and Brown who are both not even close to the level.  Billings as well... putrid.

Fullarton may not have offered much more but should've played ahead of Brown.

No white line fever from far too many,  no run and foot skills horrid.

How so many looked cooked off a 10 day break is mind boggling.

Why May was not put on to Waterman from the get go is astounding.  

Fritta about the only player that looked as if he new what he was doing.

PRESSURE PRESSURE PRESSURE???  Especially through the middle.  The two way running and hunt has dissapeared bar Viney.

Back to the drawing board for all involved.  That was an absolute horror show from start to finish.

Edited by Demon Dynasty


These games can be ones you look to as a start of the decline, I desperately hope we have more in us but today it really looked like one of those changing of the guard moments seeing Trac and Oliver getting muppetted by Reid. Thought it would be a few years before we'd be saying this.

It will only be that if we let it though.

I wonder whether mcqualter has had a detrimental impact on our midfield, I don't remember watching such an insipid melbourne midfield for a very long time and I haven't seen one that gets continually beaten regardless of the team we are matched up against. 

Everything stems from the midfield, poor entries, lack of territory, having to absorb repeat forward 50 entries in defense. It mostly comes back to mids winning the ball and retaining possession. As i said, i believe this is the worst our midfield has ever functioned in recent memory and i imagine the stats would suggest that as well, but why?

I genuinely can't understand why this is the case this year and i'm wondering whether it is a coaching issue. 

I'm one of the more optimistic posters on here but that was genuinely [censored]. Still think we will be OK but the margin for error is shrinking. There's a few that have to go back to Casey for a while.

4 minutes ago, seventyfour said:

2021 feels more and more like a lucky flag in an asterisk* year.

We couldn't win a final in 22 or 23 and this team is far worse.

Will be years before we contend again.

If 2021 was an asterisk year then why did every team even bother play that year? Disrespectful to Melbourne's Premiership team and rest of the competition. Let's just put an asterisk to every year we don't win the premiership while we're at it then.


We’ll respond, then [censored] the bed the following week with another insipid performance.

A lot of teams have overtaken us, it doesn’t look pretty.

Just now, poita said:

It's absolutely laughable that some people think we have depth. We have maybe 18 decent players and the rest are very, very ordinary. 

The failure of Goodwin and Lamb to turn over our many C graders and try to find some diamonds in the rough over the past three years is a massive dereliction of duty. 

18 is generous.

What today’s game showed is that one player can change the fortunes of an entire club and North Melbourne made the stupidest decision you’ll ever see to win that last game of 2023.

The way AFL is currently played, you need elite skills to move the ball quickly and/or legspeed - skimp on either and you’re making up the numbers.

Our best players suit our defensive style very well but if that game doesn’t eventuate, it’s very ugly.

I haven’t seen our midfield play this poorly for a long time. And it’s been over the past 4-5 games

Viney and Clarry the main 2 out of form but Trac only played one Q today. 

Back to the drawing board

 

Worst performance since 2019.

Can’t wait to hear @binman defend this midfield mix. Beaten by a 19 year old and the likes of Duggan.

I honestly think Goodwin needs to drop the kick mark style. Go back to our clearance and territory game. As soon as the opposition curtails our uncontested game we turn to water.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 17 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies