Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
 

A precis of the article, please...


We deserve almost every spray that heads our way. Not sure about the "What do you stand for" garbage though.

What does Collingwood stand for?

Just a dumb article.

One sentence reads "In 2009 they took Tom Scully at 1 and Jack Trengove at 2. Nat Fyfe went at 20"

That alone shows you how lazy and ill informed the article is. 

 

3 minutes ago, faultydet said:

We deserve almost every spray that heads our way. Not sure about the "What do you stand for" garbage though.

What does Collingwood stand for?

A business lifeline for orthodontists?

 
14 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

A precis of the article, please...

  • Essentially details our history associated with universities, big business and accountants (so not blue collar).
  • Details Glen Bartlett's choice to move here for work even though he played in WA
  • Poor drafting choices, contrasts Cale Morton to Lachie Henderson
  • Questions drafting both May and Lever, as they are allegedly similar types
  • Wonders about the influence or lack thereof of  Richardson on game style
  • States that everyone knows that the sweat on the gym floor at Aami Park is Melbourne Storm and not the players - ie: don't work hard enough
  • 3 A graders - Gawn, Petracca (when he works hard enough) and Oliver
  • Can't spread
  • Our bodies are not big enough to compete with the best.

post script. I'm neither here nor there on Malthouse or anyone commenting on any team. This is such a superficial sense making article, a grab bag of quotes and anecdotes (see comment re: Melbourne Storm) which I believe was from around 5-10 years ago. But it is of course the Herald Sun.

 

Edited by Engorged Onion

8 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:
  • Essentially details our history associated with univeristy and accountant (so not blue collar).
  • Details Glen Bartlett's choice to move here for work even though he played in WA
  • Poor drafting choices, contrasts Cale Morton to Lachie Henderson
  • Questions drafting both May and Lever, as they are allegedly similar types
  • Wonders about the influence or lack thereof of  Richardson on game style
  • States that everyone knows that the sweat on the gym floor at Aami Park is Melbourne Storm and not the players - ie: don't work hard enough
  • 3 A graders - Gawn, Petracca (when he works hard enough) and Oliver
  • Can't spread
  • Our bodies are not big enough to compete with the best.

Many thanks EG.

Most points are rubbish or ancient history.  I've highlighted the ones that imv have validity. 

Malthouse doesn't like nor respect us.  Nonetheless he was the only commentator that predicted we wouldn't make finals and crash badly in 2019.  Whatever drove that prediction he has a better grasp on what it takes to be a premiership contender than many of us care to admit.

Would love to make and have some success in finals this year, just to prove him wrong.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


7 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:
  • Essentially details our history associated with universities, big business and accountants (so not blue collar).
  • Details Glen Bartlett's choice to move here for work even though he played in WA
  • Poor drafting choices, contrasts Cale Morton to Lachie Henderson
  • Questions drafting both May and Lever, as they are allegedly similar types
  • Wonders about the influence or lack thereof of  Richardson on game style
  • States that everyone knows that the sweat on the gym floor at Aami Park is Melbourne Storm and not the players - ie: don't work hard enough
  • 3 A graders - Gawn, Petracca (when he works hard enough) and Oliver
  • Can't spread
  • Our bodies are not big enough to compete with the best.

post script. I'm neither here nor there on Malthouse or anyone commenting on any team. This is such a superficial sense making article, a grab bag of quotes and anecdotes (see comment re: Melbourne Storm) which I believe was from around 5-10 years ago. But it is of course the Herald Sun.

 

Thanks.

He hasn't said anything we don't already know.

Bit tough on the work rate jibe? 

Who cares, he's a total [censored] head. 

My favourite part is he mentions Salem as one of 4 quality players we have. Then says we traded the pick Kelly went for for Dom Tyson but no mention of Salem. The article cant decide whether it wants to trash our lack of culture, historical recruiting and trading or the coach and game plan. So why not a little bit from all three columns :)

Edited by big_red_fire_engine

I don't like Stephen Milne but gee I wish the ball bounced up for him. 

Malthouse is a poor man's Sheedy. Kick it along the boundary line is not a game plan worthy of discussing.


Compare Malthouses article which is little more than " I have to submit a story or I won't get paid" To Jordan Lewis's article which hits the head on the nail. 

Edited by Mr Steve

The only thing I think we have wasted again is a realistic oppertunity to finish top 4.  Losses to Geelong, the Lions in particular and to some extent Richmond were games that I think we could look back on and rue as winnable games we let slip.  Our slow starts to seasons are killing our best opportunities to win flags.

As I see it, we have still got a good oppertunity to just make finals from here, if we continue build our form and start to beat teams above us like Collingwood, Bulldogs, Essendon, GWS and St Kilda that I think we are more than capable of.  If we keep our list healthier than everyone else, maybe we stand a better than average chance of winning a flag from outside the top four.  As much as anything though, realistically I'm looking at making finals as an oppertunity to test our team and game plan against good opposition to set-up a genuine crack for next season.  I wouldn't call that a wasted season.

Beyond all else, how can Mick call it a wasted season when it isn't finished yet?  A lot could play out from here.  It's a marathon, not a sprint.

Edited by Rodney (Balls) Grinter

Mick can have some outdated views, but a lot of the things he raises are the same as members on here have been asking over the last 18 months. 


35 minutes ago, Mr Steve said:

Compare Malthouses article which is little more than " I have to submit a story or I won't get paid" To Jordan Lewis's article which hits the head on the nail. 

Hit's the head on the nail. Interesting, painful but an unusual take on an old saying. Might even catch on.

1 hour ago, No Plan B said:

Just a dumb article.

One sentence reads "In 2009 they took Tom Scully at 1 and Jack Trengove at 2. Nat Fyfe went at 20"

That alone shows you how lazy and ill informed the article is. 

 

Interesting...I remember Malthouse commentating on radio.

I think it was a Friday night game at the 'G' and Scully had a purple patch in the final Q in his first season or was it 2nd, anyway...

Malthouse was asked about Scully.

"One word, Judd' said Malthouse.

I wonder if he thought we got the pick wrong then????

 

It’s a strange article. My big takeaway is that Mick doesn’t bother to do any recent research. Why are we still talking about Cale Morton and Grimes in 2020? Did we fluff the development of Darren Cuthbertson in 1992 as well Mick?

It’s ok Grandad. I’ll get you some milk.

 
1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Who cares what that schlemiel has to say. 

Oy gevalt !!!!! What does schlemiel mean ???? 

 

6 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

It’s a strange article. My big takeaway is that Mick doesn’t bother to do any recent research. Why are we still talking about Cale Morton and Grimes in 2020? Did we fluff the development of Darren Cuthbertson in 1992 as well Mick?

It’s ok Grandad. I’ll get you some milk.

Malthouse is still frothing at the gills for us beating and replacing his Footscray for the last finals spot in 1987 on their home turf. I remember the look on his face after the game. He couldn’t believe they lost.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Thanks
    • 12 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 34 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 20 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Vomit
      • Sad
      • Thanks
    • 223 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland