Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

10 hours ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

Does make you wounder if Max rubs too many of the umpires up the wrong way.  Coincidentally it was against St Kilda last year that the umps awarded free after free against Max for trivial ruck infringements that were only explained post game.

I thought the same thing.  There seems to be as much unconscious bias by umpires in Brownlow voting as there is with supporter 'affirmation' based free kicks.

I wondered whether Oliver is in the same boat.  The umpires could not have missed all the undeserved talk of 'diving' and 'throwing' and he is a cheeky sort of a guy.

Rapt for all our players and the team.  For us to come second in team polling is another strong indicator of how far we have come over the last 4-5 years.

 

@Ethan Tremblayloved the instagram by Gus sending up the AFL.  Reckon he will get an invite next year! 

He might start Hi-5's with all the umpires next year, not just Razor.  Huge achievement for him and a great way for his family to end the year.

 
15 minutes ago, sue said:

This.  I may be wrong but I don't recall us winning any Brownlows in the 50's/60's.   We may have led the total votes count however.

Smith's ethos was team first.

 
14 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

The top three teams to win Brownlow medals are Sydney with 14 medals, Western Bulldogs (10) and St Kilda (10). They've won 5, 2 and 1 premierships respectively. 

Except the Brownlow came from the premiership team just last year.

The Brownlow has always been an umpires votes and was fine when there was only 1 umpire.

Then we went to 2 umps and one year they both voted and the vote tally was huge so they decided that the umpires would concur and give one set of votes. The flaw in the system is now 3 umpires have to compromise and pick a consensus 3,2,1 and given they cannot often agree on a correct umpiring decision it is no surprise they get some wrong.

Now it is a midfielder award


36 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

Did I read correctly? Rance got 0 votes. Ha so why did he get an invite? The superstar got donuts

Umpires clearly don't like 'stagers'.  They started paying frees against him.  Teach the sod a lesson.

44 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

Did I read correctly? Rance got 0 votes. Ha so why did he get an invite? The superstar got donuts

Plenty of great players don't get Brownlow votes. For example, Neville Jetta has never received a Brownlow vote.

54 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

The top three teams to win Brownlow medals are Sydney with 14 medals, Western Bulldogs (10) and St Kilda (10). They've won 5, 2 and 1 premierships respectively. 

Happy to swap a swag of Brownlows for more premierships please. kthkbye

 

Let us celebrate Gus and Gawny's results.

Maybe the umpires are closer to the action and realise the "quality"of a players involvement a little better than from a TV Screen or from 200 metres away.

Let us recognise it is an Umpire Voted award. The Coaches have their award and Channell 7 have theirs etc.

The one that would rate the least credible is Ch 7 , because the organisation of last nights count  resembled a school concert, because they could not work out what the main event was. ( It was really Richo/Cooney  skit which was great.) Let us revert to making it a radio event and have reported driving around Melbourne to find the winner. ( and telecast that !!!)


1 hour ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Plenty of great players don't get Brownlow votes. For example, Neville Jetta has never received a Brownlow vote.

now that is quite staggering

Congratulations to Gus, Big Max, Clayton and the rest of the Team, the boy's played some great tough and exciting footy in 2018, let's hope that we can pick up a bit of quality support for Max and that Jesse and Jake can come back to their utter best in 2019 so that we don't drop those games that we should win and we can finish top 4 to have a really good crack in 2019 and beyond.

I love what this team brings to the game most weeks, however we need to find another 5% internally and bring in a few fresh faces again to maintain and refresh our enthusiasm and will to win.And Yes hemingway Nev Jetta is a Super star of the competition on and off the field and wasn't it great to see Jimma's daughter doing such a grand job on the night, he would have been proud indeed.

We had 93 votes total.  That has to be the most ever by Melbourne?    I doubt we have ever gone close to that before.

The umpires do a great job, particularly when you consider they have to leave their Labradors off the ground!

Apologies for the political incorrectness of my post, I’m a keen supporter of Guide dogs association and have a lab and a mungrel lab, should have called him Nicholls!!

15 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

Congrats Gus and Gawn on finishing in the top 5 that's some effort GO DEES!

Technically top 4


6 hours ago, dees189227 said:

Did I read correctly? Rance got 0 votes. Ha so why did he get an invite? The superstar got donuts

He was Bruce McAvaney's plus 1

22 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

He was Bruce McAvaney's plus 1

Rancey, Rancey oh Rancey.

5 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Plenty of great players don't get Brownlow votes. For example, Neville Jetta has never received a Brownlow vote.

and ANB got 3 votes in one game.  what a world

no offence Alex

7 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

A few observations:

  • Brayshaw polling more than Oliver suggests two things. He kicks the ball more than Oliver, so perhaps umpires value that form of disposal more than handpassing. As it generally equates to more metres gained, that's understandable, even though it's often the first handpass that sets that train in motion. Secondly, Oliver has a habit of arguing with umpires when he gives away a free kick or doesn't receive what he believes he's earned. I suspect umpires don't respond well to that implied criticism

Exactly what I was thinking. He continually argues and comes across as a gobby little whiney shiite. If I was an umpire I would be less than well disposed towards him and be more likely to give votes to someone else.

Congrats to Angus Brayshaw. Plays a style that looks good. Doesn't argue. Could be one of those players that polls well year after year, the way Adam Goodes did.

I think Gawn did about as well as a ruckman can do these days. Again, congrats. He had a good year and was a deserved AA and ruckman of the year.

9 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

 

I thought the same thing.  There seems to be as much unconscious bias by umpires in Brownlow voting as there is with supporter 'affirmation' based free kicks.

I wondered whether Oliver is in the same boat.  The umpires could not have missed all the undeserved talk of 'diving' and 'throwing' and he is a cheeky sort of a guy.

Rapt for all our players and the team.  For us to come second in team polling is another strong indicator of how far we have come over the last 4-5 years.

 

@Ethan Tremblayloved the instagram by Gus sending up the AFL.  Reckon he will get an invite next year! 

He might start Hi-5's with all the umpires next year, not just Razor.  Huge achievement for him and a great way for his family to end the year.

Doubt it. Grundy imo was set to poll more because he won more of the ball. Ruckman just don't poll well. Gawn did superbly to get as much as he did. 


8 hours ago, dimmy said:

Let us celebrate Gus and Gawny's results.

Maybe the umpires are closer to the action and realise the "quality"of a players involvement a little better than from a TV Screen or from 200 metres away.

Let us recognise it is an Umpire Voted award. The Coaches have their award and Channell 7 have theirs etc.

The one that would rate the least credible is Ch 7 , because the organisation of last nights count  resembled a school concert, because they could not work out what the main event was. ( It was really Richo/Cooney  skit which was great.) Let us revert to making it a radio event and have reported driving around Melbourne to find the winner. ( and telecast that !!!)

Not totally sure if you are serious pal but trusting in the likes of Nicholls and Razor is a fools game, there is a reason why some of the greatest players ever think Lethal, Carey and Ablett Senior have zero brownlows between them. The whole Brownlow thing suits guys that run around on their own collecting cheap kicks even if the cant actually kick a footy think Harvey, Round and Martin.

Accountable players like Oliver, Viney and Harmes don't run around collecting the easy kicks so aren't likely to win one, Brayshaw might he ticks a few of the boxes, forget about Maxy, super season again but not collecting anywhere near enough cheap possession to win a Brownlow. Jesse Hogan was up there with the very best forward in the first half and don't see his name anywhere.

 

All in all do what I do, don't bother watching the Brownlow, when you put any focus on the opinions of Razor and his mates you have lost the plot.

 

3 hours ago, Aus in Engerland said:

Exactly what I was thinking. He continually argues and comes across as a gobby little whiney shiite. If I was an umpire I would be less than well disposed towards him and be more likely to give votes to someone else.

Congrats to Angus Brayshaw. Plays a style that looks good. Doesn't argue. Could be one of those players that polls well year after year, the way Adam Goodes did.

I think Gawn did about as well as a ruckman can do these days. Again, congrats. He had a good year and was a deserved AA and ruckman of the year.

To me, he (Oliver) looks like he sticks up for himself, well above Brownlow or no Brownlow, personal reward or more money, money, money.

You could tell the Bubba boys were there, Danger, Gazza and Mitch himself, and they all would sacrifice for a Flag........sure.

Oliver is the consummate Team player, just ask his handballs......

Umpires are close to the action and have the best view of who is working hard and succeeding. They have shown a clear preference in recent years for players who are highly visible and who run hard, collect the ball and deliver to advantage by kicking. Describes Angus perfectly.

Clarrie's inside work is too fast and too subtle for easy comprehension. For example, everyone has lauded Jake M for the goal against dorks but Clarrie's role in contesting the loose ball in the centre, winning the ball against 2 opponents and then delivering to a free Angus has been overlooked.

Without Clarrie, the opportunity might not have been there. Angus's run and kick and Jake's goal will win votes but not Clarrie's work to win the ball. With respect, others such as Salem and Hannan, could have successfully substituted for Angus and Jake 's. But who could substitute for Clarrie?

No one. He's unique and special. And too good to ever poll well in the Brownlow.

 

 

 

 

You should have to do something if you get invited and poll 0 votes. Like a shoey.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 141 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Angry
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 39 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Angry
    • 318 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies