My 3 word player analysis V Hawthorn

[joeboy 2,922]

Jones - continuing outstanding form

Vince - needed the responsibility 

Hogan -- was comprehensively outplayed

Watts - great first half 

Petracca - couldn't get involved 

Dawes - contested without influencing 

Trengove - an unmemorable return

Gawn - tap outs only

Tyson - enjoyed more responsibility 

Oliver - should kick more

Stretch - couldn't hurt opposition

Kent - devoid of confidence

Frost - strong in defence

T. McDonald - terrific second half

O.McDonald - gradually gaining confidence

Hunt - energetic but rough

Bugg -. Important tagging job

Garlett - continued to disappoint

vandenBerg - obviously lacked energy

Jetta - steady but unobtrusive

Wagner - stuck to task

Harmes - needs a rest

[Straight Sets Simon 23,113]

Vince - Best when tagging

Garlett - Worst ever game

[waynewussell 4,208]

We were pretty much level at three quarter time with the reigning Premiers. We still had a chance 15 minutes from full time...but your summary only includes 9 positive contributions. I rest my case.

[Demon17 4,735]

Dawes:  flat hands, can't mark, not the future

[Ethan Tremblay 28,775]

2 minutes ago, Demon17 said:

Dawes:  flat hands, can't mark, not the future

Did you take notice of the conditions? 

Edited June 4, 2016 by Ethan Tremblay

[Demon17 4,735]

1 minute ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Did you take notice of the conditions? 

I knew someone would say this. No difference with conditions for Dawes. Ask any magpie fan who used to watch. Same issue there.

[Ethan Tremblay 28,775]

1 minute ago, Demon17 said:

I knew someone would say this. No difference with conditions for Dawes. Ask any magpie fan who used to watch. Same issue there.

I'll give him the benefit of playing at least a couple of games in dry conditions.

[The Song Formerly Known As 6,479]

Petracca- 89 Supercoach Points

Edited June 4, 2016 by The Song Formerly Known As

[Lucifers Hero 37,505]

2 minutes ago, The Song Formerly Known As said:

Petracca- 89 Supercoach Points

Is that good?

[Josh 1,420]

2 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Is that good?

Rockcliff scored 204 from 48 disposals. 89 is probably above average but not that great

[waynewussell 4,208]

Petracca got involved, just didn't hit up targets often enough

[leave it to deever 16,549]

24 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Did you take notice of the conditions? 

Except that marking has never been his strong suit even in the the dry

He did make an effort and played ok for his first game back

[jumbo returns 6,618]

Dawes hate forum.

He is important to this lineup....

[titan_uranus 23,114]

39 minutes ago, Josh said:

Rockcliff scored 204 from 48 disposals. 89 is probably above average but not that great

Yes but 89 is well above "couldn't get involved".

[Gorgoroth 12,431]

Garlett: out if wet.

Harmes: don't come Monday

Hogan: Learn to tackle. Or. Devoid of (defensive) effort

Tmac: Terrible below knees.

Vince: cracking game. But also, Does stupid hits

Oliver: Cleanest hands ever

Jones: cheap handball receives. (Needs to bloody stop this again, he was much better when he stopped asking for these cheapies)

Petracca: believe in yourself

Gawn: what has happened?

 

[tappysquads 618]

2 hours ago, joeboy said:

Jones - continuing outstanding form

Vince - needed the responsibility 

Hogan -- was comprehensively outplayed

Watts - great first half 

Petracca - couldn't get involved 

Dawes - contested without influencing 

Trengove - an unmemorable return

Gawn - tap outs only

Tyson - enjoyed more responsibility 

Oliver - should kick more

Stretch - couldn't hurt opposition

Kent - devoid of confidence

Frost - strong in defence

T. McDonald - terrific second half

O.McDonald - gradually gaining confidence

Hunt - energetic but rough

Bugg -. Important tagging job

Garlett - continued to disappoint

vandenBerg - obviously lacked energy

Jetta - steady but unobtrusive

Wagner - stuck to task

Harmes - needs a rest

Your Dawes description describes his whole career

Kent doesn't lack confidence, he lacks effort. He can [censored] off

there was nothing unmemorable about Trenners, just to run into the field was special. His performance was promising

[Queanbeyan Demon 6,190]

2 hours ago, joeboy said:

Jones - continuing outstanding form

Vince - needed the responsibility 

Hogan -- was comprehensively outplayed

Watts - great first half 

Petracca - couldn't get involved 

Dawes - contested without influencing 

Trengove - an unmemorable return

Gawn - tap outs only

Tyson - enjoyed more responsibility 

Oliver - should kick more

Stretch - couldn't hurt opposition

Kent - devoid of confidence

Frost - strong in defence

T. McDonald - terrific second half

O.McDonald - gradually gaining confidence

Hunt - energetic but rough

Bugg -. Important tagging job

Garlett - continued to disappoint

vandenBerg - obviously lacked energy

Jetta - steady but unobtrusive

Wagner - stuck to task

Harmes - needs a rest

 

2 hours ago, joeboy said:

Jones - continuing outstanding form

Vince - needed the responsibility 

Hogan -- was comprehensively outplayed

Watts - great first half 

Petracca - couldn't get involved 

Dawes - contested without influencing 

Trengove - an unmemorable return

Gawn - tap outs only

Tyson - enjoyed more responsibility 

Oliver - should kick more

Stretch - couldn't hurt opposition

Kent - devoid of confidence

Frost - strong in defence

T. McDonald - terrific second half

O.McDonald - gradually gaining confidence

Hunt - energetic but rough

Bugg -. Important tagging job

Garlett - continued to disappoint

vandenBerg - obviously lacked energy

Jetta - steady but unobtrusive

Wagner - stuck to task

Harmes - needs a rest

Watched different game 

[Undeeterred 2,908]

This is the most wrong you've ever got it old fella.

Joeboy - misread game completely.

[tez 6]

2 hours ago, Demon17 said:

I knew someone would say this. No difference with conditions for Dawes. Ask any magpie fan who used to watch. Same issue there.

And you take them on trust and have a football brain hmmmmmm

[hells bells 2,023]

One thing I will say after watching the replay. I reckon there was a lot of sore Hawks players after the game. We may not have won. But we belted them (fairly) almost every time we could.  

We were very tough, hard and aggressive against the masters of that sort of footy.  They were hurting at the end of the game.

[Josh 1,420]

1 hour ago, Gorgoroth said:

Garlett: out if wet.

Harmes: don't come Monday

Hogan: Learn to tackle. Or. Devoid of (defensive) effort

Tmac: Terrible below knees.

Vince: cracking game. But also, Does stupid hits

Oliver: Cleanest hands ever

Jones: cheap handball receives. (Needs to bloody stop this again, he was much better when he stopped asking for these cheapies)

Petracca: believe in yourself

Gawn: what has happened?

 

He is 208cm and it was pelting rain, fair go

[jacey 333]

2 hours ago, waynewussell said:

Petracca got involved, just didn't hit up targets often enough

 

Oliver and brayshaw wish they had CP skills and speed but they are much better footballers. 

CP Needs to make better decisions and execute under pressure. 

[Undeeterred 2,908]

24 minutes ago, jacey said:

 

Oliver and brayshaw wish they had CP skills and speed but they are much better footballers. 

CP Needs to make better decisions and execute under pressure. 

Um, he's played 5 games or something. Honestly, this is absurd.

[Undeeterred 2,908]

51 minutes ago, hells bells said:

One thing I will say after watching the replay. I reckon there was a lot of sore Hawks players after the game. We may not have won. But we belted them (fairly) almost every time we could.  

We were very tough, hard and aggressive against the masters of that sort of footy.  They were hurting at the end of the game.

Yep, and still lost.

[Wrecker45 3,378]

Trengove was inspirational on the mcc members wing side, city end. 2 against one. Ran through one and mowed down the other to get it out of bounds.

We are better with him in the side.