Jump to content

Featured Replies

47 minutes ago, Jontee said:

Rick? Lever... is that his nickname?

Anyway we should have a red hot crack at Cerra just to put the price up.

Hi Jontee. Yeah, that’s his nickname apparently. Personally I wouldn’t be looking to push any decent players out the door. Treating them as tradable commodities can be a quick way to erode the culture we’ve got our squad to invest in. I’d prefer using draft picks if we were enter the conversation for his services. Assuming we have anything worth offering. 

 

People throwing up Gus and Rivers need to think very carefully about team harmony and unity.

The players are very close knit bunch, and a lot of the way they play is because of how much they love one another and enjoy playing together.

Our culture is finally one that other clubs can be jealous of. We need to be very very careful not to just throw out key players in our team. It will cause big disharmony and could backfire. 

We also can't bring in someone who will demand huge money. Remember Oliver and Jackson will both be out of contract soon enough. That is a big chunk of money gone right there. Have to be very smart, and I think for where our list is at now, our best chance is to target specific needs with free agents or players really keen for success willing to play for less money.

 
2 hours ago, Cheesy D. Pun said:

Their list is fine. Their administration is a shambles. It's a power-hungry boy's club that's eager to make decisions when what they need is stability. 

They're about to replicate the same mistake they'd just finished making by replacing a young developing coach with an old angry one. It's ludicrous.

Maintaining stability is a proven recipe for success.

Watching On the Couch last night, I was like Cartman drinking the delicious tears of Carlton fans as they were slayed by the panel.

If he wants to play for premierships he should come and play for us at half price.


3 hours ago, A F said:

Losing Rivers or Jackson is unacceptable. No deal.

Absolutely agree. We have done (and still doing) the development on these two blokes. Get real !!! Why trade  down ????

 

Rivers and LJ don;t want to go anywhere judging by the way they celebrated on Saturday night.

And anyways, now that West coast and Freo are both rubbish (Freo has some young talent but not enough imo) i doubt you'll be hearing too much about home sickness for the next few trade periods

 

Bad luck to him that the only viable club sounds like Carlton, they genuinely seem like a basket case right now. 

Love it. 

Just now, BDA said:

Rivers and LJ don;t want to go anywhere judging by the way they celebrated on Saturday night.

And anyways, now that West coast and Freo are both rubbish (Freo has some young talent but not enough imo) i doubt you'll be hearing too much about home sickness for the next few trade periods

Jackson said on the Gus and Gawny podcast that he absolutely loves Melbourne and has no home sickness. Kid doesn't sound like he is a good enough liar to pull off such a convincing story. 


6 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Jackson said on the Gus and Gawny podcast that he absolutely loves Melbourne and has no home sickness. Kid doesn't sound like he is a good enough liar to pull off such a convincing story. 

Haha...I thought the exact same thing

Wouldn't it be funny if Carlton are the only club to put up their hand and Cerra decided to stay at Freo instead.

The only way I see this happening is if Sam Weideman wanted to move on and we landed a handy pick/picks which could be on-traded to Fremantle. But this seems unlikely.

5 hours ago, Stiff Arm said:

Current 2nd rounder (is that tied to Hawks?) plus future 1st? Not enough?

Player plus future 1st? Who and what gets it done?

Freo gave us 6 and 23 for Hogan and a packet of cheezels a few years back. 
 

So essentially how do we get a first round pick inside the top ten to be anywhere competitive in this scenario for Freo?

44 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

Wouldn't it be funny if Carlton are the only club to put up their hand and Cerra decided to stay at Freo instead.

I'd take less and come and play for Melbourne if my surname was Cerra, but I'm a bit biased.


Honestly, I think this is one we just have to accept isn't going to be ours.

Whoever gets him will probably be happy enough but there's not much we can do to influence the situation.

Whatever will be will be.

If the rumours of what he is going to get paid are true (750k), no thanks, not interested

4 minutes ago, DavidNeitz9 said:

If the rumours of what he is going to get paid are true (750k), no thanks, not interested

If we believed every rumour of what our players are on, MFC would be about $3m p.a. over the cap. 

Im willing to bet not many of the rumours were close to the money (pun intended)

Edited by ding

5 hours ago, A F said:

Losing Rivers or Jackson is unacceptable. No deal.

Agreed. Maybe we can package up Weideman and Joel Smith?

 

 

 

 

Relax guys, I'm joking!

1 hour ago, DavidNeitz9 said:

If the rumours of what he is going to get paid are true (750k), no thanks, not interested

that's a lot of money even for a 21 year old private school boy 😁


7 hours ago, Fat Tony said:

Possible trade Eishold, Godfrey, Hopgood, Bartram and Spencer for Cerra

Still too soon to be mentioning Simon Eishold in September. It’s only been 34 years.

☹️

Edited by The heart beats true

4 hours ago, Jaded said: Kid doesn't sound like he is a good enough liar to pull off such a convincing story. 

In others words he ( Rivers ) is no Tom Scully.

9 hours ago, CYB said:

I dont think anyone would be interested in moving away from the Dees at the moment. Cerra would be a great acquisition and there are number of player + trades that will get it done.

The one that is most logical would be one of Brayshaw / Rivers / Dogga given they are all WA boys. Brayshaw's immediate family is here (as is his GF and her family) so doubtful he would want to pick up and move. Rivers and Dogga however, may look to move back home purely given how COVID has displaced everybody here in VIC. 

I would look at Rivers + 2nd round pick for Cerra only if he indicated that he wanted to go back home. Id do everything to keep Dogga - that kid is going to be a star. 

Talk about destabilising a Club and list!!

Forget it snd let us build strength the way we have which is going to last!

 

 
17 hours ago, Jontee said:

Rick? Lever... is that his nickname?

Anyway we should have a red hot crack at Cerra just to put the price up.

Here's Rick Lever explaining the nickname, Just click the link and it will take you to the story :)

7 hours ago, 58er said:

Talk about destabilising a Club and list!!

Forget it snd let us build strength the way we have which is going to last!

 

Hasn't our side been built by adding in players from other clubs, May, Lever, Brown, Langdon plus adding youth through the draft.  It is a balance I get that but lets wait to see how we go in finals before we rule any one out.  I'm not saying it will be Cerra, would love him as he adds something we need to improve our list in a really good age bracket, but I'm sure the list management team has a list of outside mids from other clubs that we want to target in trade week.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 316 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies