Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dunno, either no change or Vandenberg for ANB

  • Like 3
Posted

No change, unless forced

  • Like 6
Posted

Harmes and AN are the 2 in question. But on tonites performance probably none.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

ANB out for Sparrow?

Vanders/Melksham in for Harmes who is medi-sub?

Edited by ProperDee
Posted
23 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

No change. 
 

I agree I’d think about Harmes out for Sparrow.  
Harmesy fumbles and seems to run back into trouble.  But he’s heart keeps him in. 

His handballs are never good either puts us under the hammer or the oppo get it

  • Sad 1
Posted

Harness, maybe, and ANB would be those under serious question, but will depend on who does what for Casey as well. 
Of course there could be “niggles” and “management”, but thank the lord that those who advocated Kozzie being “rested” tonight went unheeded. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I can’t see them dropping ANB. The mix of smalls has worked pretty consistently all year. I’m not dropping him after one average game just as I wasn’t dropping Pickett after several.

Harmes is the only question mark for mine, and it’s just a question of if we want something a bit different in that final midfield spot with Vandenberg or Melksham. I see no point in dropping him for another like player in Sparrow.

I’m thinking no change though after that result. 

  • Like 4
Posted
8 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Harness, maybe, and ANB would be those under serious question, but will depend on who does what for Casey as well. 
Of course there could be “niggles” and “management”, but thank the lord that those who advocated Kozzie being “rested” tonight went unheeded. 

Harness and Maybe? Niggles and Management I don't know these nicknames, is Maybe Maysie, Niggles Nibbler. And Management, Goodwin? ?

Posted

No change this is the best team we have got.

  • Like 5
Posted

Do they sacrifice ANB's defence stuff for Melksham's offence upside if he tears Casey to shreds? Maybe, but doubt it. 

Posted

No change i wouldn't have thought, if Nathan Jones were fit, i wouldn't mind seeing him come in for Harmes, better ball user and more clean/one touch. 

Harmes needs a negating role or he doesn't seem to play as well, wouldn't mind seeing him run with Mitchell or O'Meara and maybe Viney the other. 

It's great to beat Port but we simply can't afford to drop any of our games against the Hawks, Suns or Crows. we need at least those 3 wins to feel pretty safe in top 4. if we can win 1-2 of the other 3 games happy days. 

On tonights form we probably go very close to winning 5 or more of our remaining games. potentially all of them.

  • Like 3
Posted

Bring in the Weed for Spargo, one small to many!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
  • Shocked 1
Posted

Harmes has been very ordinary the last two weeks but at his best, he's a good player. I'd back him in to find some form over the next couple weeks.

  • Like 3
Posted

Alex Nearly Bullen - out!

In - someone better, which can't be to damn hard to find.  Chandler, bedford, lockhart, the crazy looking rednut that has played a game or three, Vanders FFS.

 

  • Angry 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...