Jump to content

Shaun Smith not happy with Joel's medical treatment.



Recommended Posts

Hopefully we do not go near any Collingwood or GWS fitness/medical staff.  they have a much worse record over the past 3-4 years than us. recurring injuries, very long injury lists most years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue seems to be that he was actually playing whilst injured and whats more and was sent back onto the field when clearly he WAS injured. Whats more it was a meaningless JLT Match. If Shaun is complaining about this aspect then it would appear to be worthy of complaint. If the player was already having groin issues and was returned to the field thus aggravating this injury even more then this is not only poor player management but could also be an OH& S case.

I was at that game and Joel Smith was clearly injured and still on the field.

If Shaun is also complaining about his rehab since, then this is another matter for which none of us have any information.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, picket fence said:

The issue seems to be that he was actually playing whilst injured and whats more and was sent back onto the field when clearly he WAS injured. Whats more it was a meaningless JLT Match. If Shaun is complaining about this aspect then it would appear to be worthy of complaint. If the player was already having groin issues and was returned to the field thus aggravating this injury even more then this is not only poor player management but could also be an OH& S case.

I was at that game and Joel Smith was clearly injured and still on the field.

If Shaun is also complaining about his rehab since, then this is another matter for which none of us have any information.

Many players are injured before and during games. Many carry injuries into games that are still affecting them to some degree. Their parents don’t always whinge about it. It’s part of footy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, jako13 said:

I have been wondering for a few years now - why is it that sports/conditiong coaches outrank the Sports Physicians and Physiotherapists at lots of AFL clubs...... who makes the game day decisions about ok or not to play on an injury? the lines have never been so blurred

The Physicians and Physiotherapists aren't responsible for performance and while they have technical expertise and provide advice are not qualified to assess the risks associated with determining the recovery, conditioning and fitness of players.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, picket fence said:

The issue seems to be that he was actually playing whilst injured and whats more and was sent back onto the field when clearly he WAS injured. Whats more it was a meaningless JLT Match. If Shaun is complaining about this aspect then it would appear to be worthy of complaint. If the player was already having groin issues and was returned to the field thus aggravating this injury even more then this is not only poor player management but could also be an OH& S case.

I was at that game and Joel Smith was clearly injured and still on the field.

If Shaun is also complaining about his rehab since, then this is another matter for which none of us have any information.

Responsibilty also rests with the player to explain their symptoms and it is possible they did not do this. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stormy Dee said:

Many players are injured before and during games. Many carry injuries into games that are still affecting them to some degree. Their parents don’t always whinge about it. It’s part of footy. 

Smiths injury was in a meaningless practice match. Why play a player clearly in pain? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 minute ago, ManDee said:

Smiths injury was in a meaningless practice match. Why play a player clearly in pain? 

I maybe wrong but I recall it being said at the time that they had to manage TMacs load. So essentially they burnt a bloke they thought they could get away with burning rather than TMac.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cards13 said:

I maybe wrong but I recall it being said at the time that they had to manage TMacs load. So essentially they burnt a bloke they thought they could get away with burning rather than TMac.

It was a practice match!  Play with 4 players for all I care, rest the lot of them. It is not as if the AFL would penalise any team for protecting players health.

Edit: I can imagine a smart coach with several injured players in a practice match saying to the opposition coach, How do you feel  about playing 16 a side we have a few injuries, happy for you to play a full side but we will be short?

Edited by ManDee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cards13 said:

I maybe wrong but I recall it being said at the time that they had to manage TMacs load. So essentially they burnt a bloke they thought they could get away with burning rather than TMac.

And this to me is the most disappointing aspect of this. We took risks with a player who isn’t automatically in our best 22, as if that’s acceptable. 

I mean if it was a do or die match I would understand, but it was a practice game and we lost! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

 

14 minutes ago, DV8 said:

Huh, so because its televised,  we have to maintain the side out there.  For TV's sake.! 

stufff JLT

 

6 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Which thread were you meant to post this in?

Thanks Dl.  I'm struggling atmo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, chookrat said:

The Physicians and Physiotherapists aren't responsible for performance and while they have technical expertise and provide advice are not qualified to assess the risks associated with determining the recovery, conditioning and fitness of players.

I think I just choked on my cornflakes..... that in a nutshell IS their jobs Chookrat. i think you missed my sarcasm.

In the real world - the person in charge of anything medically related is under the direction of the most senior person, that person has the highest insurance cover and is the one who gets sued if anything goes pearshaped.

in AFL worlds this has become a very grey area and people are making calls that they aren't necessarily the ones to

Link to comment
Share on other sites


58 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I’m not sure why Smith is airing his grievance publicly on social media. It just comes across as immature. 

I agree. I think privately Joel probably wishes his dad had not made his thoughts public. There are better ways to express concern for your son, none of them include tabloids or open SM

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, jako13 said:

I think I just choked on my cornflakes..... that in a nutshell IS their jobs Chookrat. i think you missed my sarcasm.

In the real world - the person in charge of anything medically related is under the direction of the most senior person, that person has the highest insurance cover and is the one who gets sued if anything goes pearshaped.

in AFL worlds this has become a very grey area and people are making calls that they aren't necessarily the ones to

Jako (if that is your real name), Dave Misson as Manager Elite Performance is accountable for the fitness and conditioning of our team. The Doctors, Physios, Fitness staff and Specialists outside the club are experts in their field but they are either general (club doctors) or narrow (physios, specialists) in their focus.

Dave's role is to make risk based decisions which take into account the advice he is given by experts with the fitness, conditioning and fielding a team which can play the way Simon Goodwin wants to play to bring success. While Doctors may have high insurance cover they are not trained or qualified to make these decisions. 

Interestingly Bruce Reid with the EFC during the doping program came out unscaved despite being the club doctor and probably the best place person to advise on and ensure that harmful substances were not injected into players. When it comes to long term health, e.g. concussion, mental health, doping programs, I believe club doctors should have responsibility and report to the board. For injury management and conditioning the Elite Performance coach is the person. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, chookrat said:

Jako (if that is your real name), Dave Misson as Manager Elite Performance is accountable for the fitness and conditioning of our team. The Doctors, Physios, Fitness staff and Specialists outside the club are experts in their field but they are either general (club doctors) or narrow (physios, specialists) in their focus.

Dave's role is to make risk based decisions which take into account the advice he is given by experts with the fitness, conditioning and fielding a team which can play the way Simon Goodwin wants to play to bring success. While Doctors may have high insurance cover they are not trained or qualified to make these decisions. 

Interestingly Bruce Reid with the EFC during the doping program came out unscaved despite being the club doctor and probably the best place person to advise on and ensure that harmful substances were not injected into players. When it comes to long term health, e.g. concussion, mental health, doping programs, I believe club doctors should have responsibility and report to the board. For injury management and conditioning the Elite Performance coach is the person. 

The performance coach may have no actual qualifications and may not be registered with any external body accountable to the public. Doctors and physiotherapists are highly trained, educated and are registered with AHPRA. They can be held accountable by the courts of law, the registration boards and even their learned colleges (eg RACS). It’s a very different accountability level. Yes, the performance coach is accountable to the club board but may have very little other responsibility and very little formal training and education.

Edited by Stormy Dee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Misson, the Doctor or the Coach send Joel back onto the ground? That is the question and the issue. 

If the Doctor said don’t and he was overruled, then it is that person we should be discussing.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that concerns me the most is it's not just any footy parent criticizing the club, it's a former 100 game AFL player who would know a fair but about injury management considering his own career was plagued with injury. Is he still upset with Melbourne over how his own injuries including several concussions were managed? Will Joel still be at the club next season? A bit to play out here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Stormy Dee said:

The performance coach may have no actual qualifications and may not be registered with any external body accountable to the public. Doctors and physiotherapists are highly trained, educated and are registered with AHPRA. They can be held accountable by the courts of law, the registration boards and even their learned colleges (eg RACS). It’s a very different accountability level. Yes, the performance coach is accountable to the club board but may have very little other responsibility and very little formal training and education.

While this is true the AHPRA and RACS would not care in the slightest whether Joel Smith should have been on the field or not, so such registration is not really relevant to such cases.

Dave Mission's job would be a much more stressful and difficult job than that of the medicos as he is constantly making risk based judgements that are rarely clear cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    OVER YET? by KC from Casey

    The Friday evening rush hour clash of two of the VFL’s 2024 minnows, Carlton and the Casey Demons was excruciatingly painful to watch, even if it was for the most part a close encounter. I suppose that since the game had to produce a result (a tie would have done the game some justice), the four points that went to Casey with the win, were fully justified because they went to the best team. In that respect, my opinion is based on the fact that the Blues were a lopsided combination that had

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    CENTIMETRES by Whispering Jack

    Our game is one where the result is often decided by centimetres; the touch of a fingernail, a split-second decision made by a player or official, the angle of vision or the random movement of an oblong ball in flight or in its bounce and trajectory. There is one habit that Melbourne seems to have developed of late in its games against Carlton which is that the Demons keep finding themselves on the wrong end of the stick in terms of the fine line in close games at times when centimetres mak

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    PREGAME: Rd 10 vs West Coast Eagles

    The Demons have a 10 day break before they head on the road to Perth to take on the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 261

    PODCAST: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Sunday, 12th May @ 8:30pm. Join George, Binman & I as we analyse the Demons loss at the MCG against the Blues in the Round 09. You questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human. Listen & Chat LIVE:

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 29

    VOTES: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    Last week Captain Max Gawn consolidated his lead over reigning champion Christian Petracca in the Demonland Player of the Year Award. Steven May, Jake Lever, Jack Viney & Clayton Oliver make up the Top 5. Your votes for the loss against the Blues. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 39

    POSTGAME: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    The Demons were blown out of the water in the first quarter and clawed their way back into the contest but it was a case of too little too late as they lost another close one to Carlton losing by 1 point at the MCG.  

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 486

    GAMEDAY: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    It's Game Day and the Demons are once again headlining another blockbuster at the MCG to kick off the round of footy. The Dees take on the Blues and have the opportunity to win their third game on the trot to solidify a spot in the Top 4 in addition to handing the Blues their third consecutive defeat to bundle them out of the Top 8.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 959

    MELBOURNE BUSINESS by The Oracle

    In days of old, this week’s Thursday night AFL match up between the Demons and the Blues would be framed on the basis of the need to redress the fact that Carlton “stole” last year’s semi final away from Melbourne and with it, their hopes for the premiership.  A hot gospelling coach might point out to his charges that they were the better team on the night in all facets and that poor kicking for goal and a couple of lapses at the death cost them what was rightfully theirs. Moreover, now was

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews 1

    UNDER THE PUMP by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons have been left languishing near the bottom of the VFL table after suffering a 32-point defeat at the hands of stand alone club Williamstown at Casey Fields on Sunday. The Demons suffered a major setback before the game even started when AFL listed players Ben Brown, Marty Hore and Josh Schache were withdrawn from the selected side. Only Schache was confirmed as an injury replacement, the other two held over as possible injury replacements for Melbourne’s Thursday night fixt

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...