Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted

Silly Essendon and players. They should've just denied it all like Dank has. That said if the only evidence ASADA has is that the players said they did stuff then the players will be fine!

Posted

I think a lot of you have misread my criticism.

I'm not bashing her for telling readers where to find the names.

I'm bashing her for saying that her paper would not release the names, thereby implying that she somehow has the moral high ground, and then explicitly telling the reader where the names can be found. It's disingenuous.

She should have simply said her paper would not release the names and left it at that. She did not need to point out a competing paper where the names could be found.

I made no comment on the actual ethicality of releasing the names as that is a different issue.

  • Like 1

Posted

She should have simply said her paper would not release the names and left it at that. She did not need to point out a competing paper where the names could be found.

I made no comment on the actual ethicality of releasing the names as that is a different issue.

Even if she chose to not take the free kick her editor would not have allowed her to miss the opportunity to have a shot at their only real competitor (particularly given the criticism she and the Age have copped from the sanctimonious double act of Warner and Yobbo).

  • Like 1
Posted

What suprises me is it is not the other way around.

I would have thought Wilson would be the one naming. But there you go.

Robinson is in deep water now. Hope he knows how to swim.

Maybe he should take some tips off Dank, he can swim without even getting wet.

Posted

For the HUN to reveal the names whilst trying to shape the story as one of sympathy towards the players is a total joke.

For Wilson to be bleating on her high horse about confidentiality after 18 months of reporting about the MFC tanking investigation and the EFC substance investigation via the use of a torrent of leaks of what should have been confidential information is worse.

  • Like 2

Posted

I don't get why the Age didn't just publish them.

The list of 44 bombers has been trimmed to 10 plus the 2 at other clubs plus the 2 out of the AFL. It's good news for the other 30 on the bombers list that year.

Now of course if those 10 get sanctions the bombers and probably the comp is in big trouble due to the quality of player listed. Essendon would have to get special list and salary cap concession to sign the best 10 free agents or mature VFL players they could get and they'd be a bottom 4 list for sure.

It's also good news for Jobe Watson who now is not alone as the poster boy for admitting to peptides

Posted

What we are seeing is the continuation by segments of the media to manipulate the narrative away from the primary story of an alleged sophisticated programme involving the injecting of AFL footballers with prohibited substances to one of the integrity of the organisation that has been invested with the carrying out of that investigation.

This has been the Murdoch agenda for quite some time and its insidiousness is palpable. We got a preview of things to come from Gerard Whateley who chaired yesterday's edition of the Offsiders on ABC1 but who will also co-chair AFL360 with Robertson commencing tonight on Fox Footy. Whateley keeps parroting the line used by the Bombers that ASADA told them (presumably through their agent Dank) that AOD9604 was not prohibited (a claim that has never been verified and sits in the face of what the WADA Code states) and that the thymosin used in the programme was legal although it is said that "the AFL and ASADA investigation could find no source of legal thymosin being sourced by Essendon" (Players union hits naming of Dons over drug use).

Whateley has been plain wrong on this from the very get go and he was also wrong on the Offsiders when he made the outrageous claim that nothing new had come to light since the interim report. I would have thought that the revelation by Patrick Smith last week (in the Oz) that ASADA had access to ACC material including two comprehensive interviews with Dank would be game chargers.

Yet we can expect Whateley and Robinson to repeat the same old stuff tonight and scratch their heads wondering why Dank hasn't been called up to give evidence.

What a pity there will be no opportunity for a dissenting view on that programme or that Roy Masters didn't appear in the Offsiders yesterday.

  • Like 7

Posted

WJ your comment above suggests you expect a balanced account from the Murdoch media.

I hope you don't really believe that as you are bound to be disappointed.

Jokes aside It is plain they have an agenda and we should kept that in mind when we read other "serious" pronouncements by them on the next "big" story.

This is the world according to Rupert.

  • Like 1

Posted

What we are seeing is the continuation by segments of the media to manipulate the narrative away from the primary story of an alleged sophisticated programme involving the injecting of AFL footballers with prohibited substances to one of the integrity of the organisation that has been invested with the carrying out of that investigation.

This has been the Murdoch agenda for quite some time and its insidiousness is palpable.

Good post WJ. I'd also add that Essendon and its media allies have also looked to manipulate the narrative in such a way that the focus is on the legality or otherwise of the drugs used. Indeed Whateley has been adamant on this point since the beginning and i heard him on Offsiders repeat the assertion that this is really the only issue.

The narrative is if ASADA do not charge any players then EFC are vindicated. This infuriates me. It is the very definition of a furphy. For a start it is possible that EFC did in fact used banned drugs but ASADA don't have sufficient proof (or desire?) to lay charges. This scenario is no vindication in my eyes. Bu in any case, for me to an extent the charges are secondary.

The real issue is the failure of the club to protect their players from harm. For god's sake they can not even equivocally say what drugs the players received and what is completely missed by Yobbo and the EFC apologists in discussion about AOD and the potential wrong advice from ASADA is that it is a drug that has not been properly tested and was not being used for its intended purpose. And this is just a couple of examples of how they let down their players. Hundreds of off site injections, a lack of proper proper medical oversight, ignoring their own doctors warning and in in the words of their own expert brought in to review what happened - 'a pharmacological experimental environment'.

Finnis made this very point ie the issue of the legality of the drugs is secondary to the health and welfare of the players. EFC and journos like Yobbo and Whateley refuse to address this.

And like you WJ i have lost a lot of respect for Whateley.

  • Like 3
Posted

I think your on to something here WJ. I'm reading this as an attempt by the HUN to muddy the waters of the ASADA investigation, the hypocrisy is monumental. This appears to be a calculated move aimed at discrediting ASADA and prejudicing the entire process.

Posted

I think your on to something here WJ. I'm reading this as an attempt by the HUN to muddy the waters of the ASADA investigation, the hypocrisy is monumental. This appears to be a calculated move aimed at discrediting ASADA and prejudicing the entire process.

Correct me if I am wrong here OF but the HUN belongs to the same organization that taped peoples phones.

They seem to have forgotten that they are supposed to report the news not make it.

Posted

Over the years one from time to time knows the truth of a story. eg. When the hill opposite you is on fire and the media congratulates the firies for putting it out. When in reality it is still burning and being heli bombed for three days after it was put out.

I have been in the position of knowing that facts several times. ON EVERY OCCASION THE MEDIA INCORRECTLY REPORTED THE FACTS. Every time. I have discussed this with several friends whose experiences are similar.

My more mature outlook is that I believe very little of what I read and nothing that is said on TV (it is a light box for the display of sport- sound down please - commentators are worse that journos)

Yes I may be jaded but I am not disappointed.

If the Essendon facts ever come out I will only be reading official reports, if any, and they will not tell the whole truth, but the truth to the extent that they can display it without recourse to legal action. The reality is that usually the real truth is so juicy that it would probably even shock me.

Posted

I think a lot of you have misread my criticism.

I'm not bashing her for telling readers where to find the names.

I'm bashing her for saying that her paper would not release the names, thereby implying that she somehow has the moral high ground, and then explicitly telling the reader where the names can be found. It's disingenuous.

She should have simply said her paper would not release the names and left it at that. She did not need to point out a competing paper where the names could be found.

I made no comment on the actual ethicality of releasing the names as that is a different issue.

I made the initial criticism and I didn't misread it. I think you're wrong.

EVERY news report about the issue has identified either the Herald Sun specifically or News Corp's Sunday papers generally as the source of the named players.

Is every reporter wrong? I doubt it. Why have you singled out Caro? Seemingly because of some personal bias.

Again, I suggest that you don't know what poor journalism is.

  • Like 1
Posted

I happened to be driving to an appointment today and Robbo was talking on SEN about his newspaper's revelation of the player's named in the interim report. He was building himself up to a crescendo and finished by blaming everything on ASADA.

Now, I don't know who leaked the information to Robbo but as sure as hell, I know why and that was to discredit the ASADA investigation.

Without doubt, there will be more to come tonight on AFL360.


Posted

That list has been copy pasted from the interim report. AOD isnt the only illegal one there. One of them is extract of pigs brain ffs.

Slightly off topic, but the apparent distaste for "extract of pigs brains" may be unfair. Just ask Jack Fitzpatrick what he thinks about "extract of pig's pancreas".

I accept that "extract of pig's brains" may be an unproven and even unhealthy (and possibly even an un-kosher) product. But a knee-jerk reaction just because it sounds a bit icky can be a bit short sighted.

  • Like 1
Posted

Slightly off topic, but the apparent distaste for "extract of pigs brains" may be unfair. Just ask Jack Fitzpatrick what he thinks about "extract of pig's pancreas".

I accept that "extract of pig's brains" may be an unproven and even unhealthy (and possibly even an un-kosher) product. But a knee-jerk reaction just because it sounds a bit icky can be a bit short sighted.

Fair comment, however colostrum (extract of pigs brain) is well and truly on the banned list...

Posted

Even Peter Jess has a fair idea who leaked the report to an Essendon supporting journo.

As Jess said on SEN today, why would ASADA leak it when they know it is illegal to do so, it could affect their process and they know what is coming anyway and are in control of it.

It has been done to garner support for the Essendon players, before the sh-t hits the fan. Now who would be most likely to want to protect Essendon players?

Posted

As usual just ask 'who benefits' by the publication of the players' names.

The HUN and al New Ltd media outlets just push a few agendas - somehow all those independent editors around the world always know just what Rupert wants - the uniform support in every one of his outlets for the IRAQ invasion typifies that when other papers had all sorts of views. While I doubt Rupert would personally have a position on ASADA, the mindset of running agendas rather than objective reporting permeates his organisations and everything they do. (And they have the gall to criticise the ABC for bias.)

The suspicion that this is a desperate attempt to muddy the waters and discredit ASADA seems very believable.

  • Like 1
Posted

As usual just ask 'who benefits' by the publication of the players' names.

The HUN and al New Ltd media outlets just push a few agendas - somehow all those independent editors around the world always know just what Rupert wants - the uniform support in every one of his outlets for the IRAQ invasion typifies that when other papers had all sorts of views. While I doubt Rupert would personally have a position on ASADA, the mindset of running agendas rather than objective reporting permeates his organisations and everything they do. (And they have the gall to criticise the ABC for bias.)

The suspicion that this is a desperate attempt to muddy the waters and discredit ASADA seems very believable.

Rupert might have view on WADA though.

After Brooke's recent claim on phone hacking I am surprised News waited for the leaked report and didn't just hack players phones

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    2024 Player Reviews: #7 Jack Viney

    The tough on baller won his second Keith 'Bluey' Truscott Trophy in a narrow battle with skipper Max Gawn and Alex Neal-Bullen and battled on manfully in the face of a number of injury niggles. Date of Birth: 13 April 1994 Height: 178cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 219 Goals MFC 2024: 10 Career Total: 66 Brownlow Medal Votes: 8

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 3

    TRAINING: Wednesday 13th November 2024

    A couple of Demonland Trackwatchers braved the rain and headed down to Gosch's paddock to bring you their observations from the second day of Preseason training for the 1st to 4th Year players. DITCHA'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS I attended some of the training today. Richo spoke to me and said not to believe what is in the media, as we will good this year. Jefferson and Kentfield looked big and strong.  Petty was doing all the training. Adams looked like he was in rehab.  KE

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    2024 Player Reviews: #15 Ed Langdon

    The Demon running machine came back with a vengeance after a leaner than usual year in 2023.  Date of Birth: 1 February 1996 Height: 182cm Games MFC 2024: 22 Career Total: 179 Goals MFC 2024: 9 Career Total: 76 Brownlow Medal Votes: 5 Melbourne Football Club: 5th Best & Fairest: 352 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #24 Trent Rivers

    The premiership defender had his best year yet as he was given the opportunity to move into the midfield and made a good fist of it. Date of Birth: 30 July 2001 Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 100 Goals MFC 2024: 2 Career Total:  9 Brownlow Medal Votes: 7 Melbourne Football Club: 6th Best & Fairest: 350 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 2

    TRAINING: Monday 11th November 2024

    Veteran Demonland Trackwatchers Kev Martin, Slartibartfast & Demon Wheels were on hand at Gosch's Paddock to kick off the official first training session for the 1st to 4th year players with a few elder statesmen in attendance as well. KEV MARTIN'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Beautiful morning. Joy all round, they look like they want to be there.  21 in the squad. Looks like the leadership group is TMac, Viney Chandler and Petty. They look like they have sli

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports 2

    2024 Player Reviews: #1 Steven May

    The years are rolling by but May continued to be rock solid in a key defensive position despite some injury concerns. He showed great resilience in coming back from a nasty rib injury and is expected to continue in that role for another couple of seasons. Date of Birth: 10 January 1992 Height: 193cm Games MFC 2024: 19 Career Total: 235 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 24 Melbourne Football Club: 9th Best & Fairest: 316 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 2

    2024 Player Reviews: #4 Judd McVee

    It was another strong season from McVee who spent most of his time mainly at half back but he also looked at home on a few occasions when he was moved into the midfield. There could be more of that in 2025. Date of Birth: 7 August 2003 Height: 185cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 48 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 1 Brownlow Medal Votes: 1 Melbourne Football Club: 7th Best & Fairest: 347 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #31 Bayley Fritsch

    Once again the club’s top goal scorer but he had a few uncharacteristic flat spots during the season and the club will be looking for much better from him in 2025. Date of Birth: 6 December 1996 Height: 188cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 149 Goals MFC 2024: 41 Career Total: 252 Brownlow Medal Votes: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 9

    2024 Player Reviews: #18 Jake Melksham

    After sustaining a torn ACL in the final match of the 2023 season Jake added a bit to the attack late in the 2024 season upon his return. He has re-signed on to the Demons for 1 more season in 2025. Date of Birth: 12 August 1991 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 229 Goals MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 188

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 7
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...