Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

He's got buckley's chance of getting a game in 2025 for BWS with the key backs and forwards in their arsenal.

Beer Wine Spirits?

 
4 hours ago, samcantstandya said:

We granted Neal-Bullen's request but GWS didn't. We are a compassionate club.

Too friggen so should have played hardball it aint a St. Vincent De Paul store!

2 hours ago, mo64 said:

We can get him to start work at the Caulfield redevelopment.

Well according to BT James Magner built Eastlink by himself.

 
5 hours ago, Little Richard said:

Jackson was an anomaly. How many other rucks over the past 10-20 years were virtually ready to go like he was? It's no secret the majority take much longer to develop.

Also true of Jackson. He was OK enough to be worthy of a game in his first season, but he's now into his 5th season and is still improving. Against that, 5 years in and he's not exactly taking the comp apart, and the difference between 2nd year and 5th year Jackson is not all that flagrant. 9th in Fremantle's Best and Fairest, still not the finished article.

Not knocking him, would love to still have him, but I'm not sure even Jackson is a good counter-example for rucks take time.

5 hours ago, DubDee said:

Bloke is 23yo and has 3 kids?!

Clearly Can hit a target and can kick a goal

He'd be a great gardener by all accounts.


9 hours ago, Demonland said:

 

Whilst it sucks for us Kane is 100% correct.  Should happen more in footy to the bigger names.

He's staying at GWS.

They're pretty adamant after talks this weeks and a few proposals put forward to them that he's staying.

Just remember GWS have a history of this with Cam McCarthy. 

 
12 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

He's staying at GWS.

They're pretty adamant after talks this weeks and a few proposals put forward to them that he's staying.

Just remember GWS have a history of this with Cam McCarthy. 

Time will tell if their stance is the same at the end of the trade period. I find it hard to believe anything the clubs say during trade whether it’s positive or negative towards us. 

I believe it when i see it. 

I do think this needs to be more of a talking point across the AFL.

I follow professional sports in other countries. In the NBA, I don't think I've ever heard of a player asking for a trade due to family reasons or being homesick. Its all part of the job and being a professional player at the highest level. Its just a given that its a business and a job where sacrifices must be made.

Perhaps the ANB situation is a bit different as he has been a servent of the club for 10 years. I wonder if he were only a second or third year player if such a request would have been accepted. Might be one of two times I've ever agree with Kane on this that if you put your name in a draft that you are accepting as a professional sportsman to be picked by any side, possibly interstate and that you need to make it work for the club that picked you.

The only the only other argument Wade has is that he wants more of an opportunity to play AFL as he's been two or three behind the pecking order as a key forward/back. GWS/McCarthy is now saying that due to players leaving this off season that there is now less depth and more likelihood that he might play.

I'd still be [censored] if I was Wade.


12 minutes ago, Young Blood said:

I do think this needs to be more of a talking point across the AFL.

I follow professional sports in other countries. In the NBA, I don't think I've ever heard of a player asking for a trade due to family reasons or being homesick. Its all part of the job and being a professional player at the highest level. Its just a given that its a business and a job where sacrifices must be made.

Perhaps the ANB situation is a bit different as he has been a servent of the club for 10 years. I wonder if he were only a second or third year player if such a request would have been accepted. Might be one of two times I've ever agree with Kane on this that if you put your name in a draft that you are accepting as a professional sportsman to be picked by any side, possibly interstate and that you need to make it work for the club that picked you.

The only the only other argument Wade has is that he wants more of an opportunity to play AFL as he's been two or three behind the pecking order as a key forward/back. GWS/McCarthy is now saying that due to players leaving this off season that there is now less depth and more likelihood that he might play.

I'd still be [censored] if I was Wade.

This is the club we cleared their best tagger to for a steal as they widely admit.

Think it will get done late in trade period.

1 hour ago, titan_uranus said:

 

It's hilarious.

Other clubs are dealing on star players and we are struggling with a 23 year old, who hasn't played a game and wants to come home for family reasons.

5 minutes ago, Redleg said:

It's hilarious.

Other clubs are dealing on star players and we are struggling with a 23 year old, who hasn't played a game and wants to come home for family reasons.

It's not our struggle? He wants to come to us but he's in contract with a club who is losing 4-5 put of contract,, who rate him and have a history of holding players to deals. Unless you want us to trade with exhorbitant overs to wrench him out unsure what more we do unless/until they change position.

Also plenty of deals currently with preferred clubs poles apart at the minute. Typical trade period half way through. 

Edited by Lil_red_fire_engine

I think the unfortunate situation here for Dirk is the move to the Dees gives him more job security ie 3 year deal. Currently 12 months left at GWS and that could be him done at the end of 12 months if he doesn’t play any AFL next season, gets injured ect.
 

Dees are keen now by who knows this time next year.

He really needs to say to GWS  -  ok you are going to hold me to my contract but I am fighting for my career here. I need a few more years for security and to prove myself. Trade me to the Dees or offer me a contract extension. 
 

This loss of security of remaining at GWS is the  unfortunate situation. 

 

 


13 minutes ago, Lil_red_fire_engine said:

It's not our struggle? He wants to come to us but he's in contract with a club who is losing 4-5 put of contract,, who rate him and have a history of holding players to deals. Unless you want us to trade with exhorbitant overs to wrench him out unsure what more we do unless/until they change position.

Also plenty of deals currently with preferred clubs poles apart at the minute. Typical trade period half way through. 

I am not knocking us, but rather the situation we find ourselves in.

Not sure how highly they really rate him. Do you think they rate him ahead of Hogan, Cadman, Taylor, Buckley, Himmelberg, Riccardi, Brown and or Gruzewski? Given they are all staying and he hasn't got a game ahead of them yet, unless a few go down with injury, he is probably still not getting a game ahead of them.

  • Author
1 hour ago, titan_uranus said:

 

Ridiculous statement

 

He is a 194cm Forward/Defender

29 minutes ago, Redleg said:

It's hilarious.

Other clubs are dealing on star players and we are struggling with a 23 year old, who hasn't played a game and wants to come home for family reasons.

It is pretty sad. Even after winning a premiership and clearly being a window of success, we weren't able to attract any star players. We've done some weak trades over the the past few years to ensure good will and being a good trading partner too. If we can't get a deal done for a mature age battler who hasn't played a game, then that good will built was for nothing.

14 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

It is pretty sad. Even after winning a premiership and clearly being a window of success, we weren't able to attract any star players. We've done some weak trades over the the past few years to ensure good will and being a good trading partner too. If we can't get a deal done for a mature age battler who hasn't played a game, then that good will built was for nothing.

We did have Cerra but not the draft capital, and Houston before the shambles narrative took over.

1 hour ago, Pulp Fritschon said:

I think the unfortunate situation here for Dirk is the move to the Dees gives him more job security ie 3 year deal. Currently 12 months left at GWS and that could be him done at the end of 12 months if he doesn’t play any AFL next season, gets injured ect.
 

Dees are keen now by who knows this time next year.

He really needs to say to GWS  -  ok you are going to hold me to my contract but I am fighting for my career here. I need a few more years for security and to prove myself. Trade me to the Dees or offer me a contract extension. 
 

This loss of security of remaining at GWS is the  unfortunate situation. 

 

 

If he shows form in 2025 and plays some AFL games then he will be offered another contract potentially a better one than he would get if he negotiated it now 

His challenge is to push into a GWS team that has more depth on the list for players like him

If I was him I’d be still wanting to move next year either way as they haven’t exactly acted in good faith given the circumstances 


1 hour ago, SthSea22 said:

Ridiculous statement

 

He is a 194cm Forward/Defender

IF he came into the squad, do you see him best 22 as either a forward/defender and relief ruck - instead of JvR?

4 minutes ago, roy11 said:

IF he came into the squad, do you see him best 22 as either a forward/defender and relief ruck - instead of JvR?

No or wer’re bottom 4

2 hours ago, Redleg said:

It's hilarious.

Other clubs are dealing on star players and we are struggling with a 23 year old, who hasn't played a game and wants to come home for family reasons.

It's  how we roll ( towards cliff... ) 

 
  • Author
11 minutes ago, roy11 said:

IF he came into the squad, do you see him best 22 as either a forward/defender and relief ruck - instead of JvR?

Relief Ruck

The OP is describing him as a genuine ruck lol 

2 hours ago, roy11 said:

IF he came into the squad, do you see him best 22 as either a forward/defender and relief ruck - instead of JvR?

Only if they are planning to play JVR at Casey


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 148 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 178 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Vomit
      • Shocked
      • Thumb Down
      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 533 replies