Jump to content

bing181

Life Member
  • Posts

    7,413
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Paris, France

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

bing181's Achievements

Trident

Trident (5/10)

8.9k

Reputation

  1. Good on him, he worked for it. Gives us another year's cover for the younger brigade (whoever they are ...).
  2. Just because there's nothing in the press that's not to say that those areas aren't being reviewed. All organisations undertake reviews, internal or with external input, and all of those areas have to report to the board.
  3. Simply not true, and the larger the company the less true it becomes. Reviews focusing on specific areas of an organisation's operations are not just more common, they're more effective.
  4. Some of the comments here show just how disconnected average football fans are from the reality of large, professional, elite-level sports clubs.
  5. Disagree. Professional AFL players have been around and can see past the external pile-on. Their decision-making process isn't going to hinge on what they read in the papers, but on the usual work stuff: conditions, contract, opportunities, coaches/managemet etc. Having said all that, don't see Macrae would work, from both sides. Imagine he'd be better off at a team with a younger mid group who needs his experience.
  6. Seriously? He was cheap depth, traded for a future 3rd-rounder.
  7. if anyone thinks that these kinds of decisions come down to Tim Lamb and Tim Lamb alone ... For starters there is a List Management committee which includes Taylor and presumably Richardson, but decisions on bringing in players would involve coaches as well.
  8. He was already pushed out of the wing spot by Brayshaw. But even when Jordan played the wing he was in/out of the side.
  9. Suspect more the latter. Might lead to stricter rules around rib injuries, as much as anything because they can be so hard to diagnose on the spot.
  10. From what I've read on him, Shand isn't going to be involved in something that's just window-dressing. But you only have to look at his background (sports/performance/rteam-building) to know where the focus will be. You don't bring in someone like Shand to review the admin, it's not really his speciality and there are plenty of people on the Board who are capable of doing that. (Which is also why they're there.)
  11. Giving him too much credit. Initiatives like this aren't put in place overnight.
  12. Landing the club with $500K in unnecessary costs is a bit more than "stepping out of line".
  13. Including managing the other coaches. Worth digging out the interview that Burgess gave when he left late 2021, where there are real insights into Goodwin's capabilities in that regard.
  14. Seems pretty clear: "Green said he would lead a review of the Board aimed at resetting and refreshing its performance"
×
×
  • Create New...