Jump to content

PREGAME: Rd 12 vs Carlton

Demonland
Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Superunknown said:

Juicy enough to get on board for an emotional hedge 

Freo at $3.75 on the Monday before our match was a tantalisingly emotional hedge.

    • Like 1
     

    I hate the media noise around Carlton this week. Hating on them is flavour of the week. It could go one of two ways, but there’s no doubt that they’ll come out firing. 

    • Like 2
    12 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

    I hate the media noise around Carlton this week. Hating on them is flavour of the week. It could go one of two ways, but there’s no doubt that they’ll come out firing. 

    We lose this and the media turn their full attention to us - even if Geelong lose to the Doggies. 

    Melbourne of old would have buckled under the weight of expectation and off field pressure. Have some credits in the bank over the past few years. But lose and face a 4 possibly 5 match loosing streak. 

    I just have a feeling the game in Geelong will be a game where it will be a battle for both teams to keep their respective seasons alive. 

     

    All the better Key forwards have height around 200cm, so you need at least one backman around that height and we used to have it in Petty.   Lever has a decent leap and makes up for that when he has space to launch but because we only have 2 talls in defence that is a rarity.   We've tried with Thommo but he is more a bulk defender and that hasn't worked.  It's a pity Kye Turner has been injured all year as he is a leaping type.   J.Smith might have filled the roll but he's been put as a forward.  To make it worse Salem never gets airborn.  Verell might fill that role next year but you'd risk wrecking him this year as he hasn't got a mature body.  With 4 small defenders it makes it tough.

    In the forward line it's the same problem.  We miss Brown's height but he's on one leg.  We have the ideal replacement next year with Jefferson but its the same as Verell above.   We don't have a 200cm replacement so you need a leaping forward at least to negate the defensive intercept marking.  There's only one but no one likes him.

    2 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

    I hate the media noise around Carlton this week. Hating on them is flavour of the week. It could go one of two ways, but there’s no doubt that they’ll come out firing. 

    Probably more chance of the umpires coming out firing than Carlton. They look a boiling hot mess. The media has been biting at their ankles for a while now. Dont see why this game should be any different. Cant pull up your socks if you dont have any. 

    • Haha 1

    4 hours ago, brendan said:

    This has a Carlton win and McKay to kick 6 goals straight feel about it, I wonder what the odds are lol

    We opened very short and then drifted but since late Monday all the money is one way going on us.

     

    3 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

    I hate the media noise around Carlton this week. Hating on them is flavour of the week. It could go one of two ways, but there’s no doubt that they’ll come out firing. 

    I'd suspect Carlton fans are saying similar RE the attention were getting in the media too

    24 minutes ago, Deebauched said:

    Probably more chance of the umpires coming out firing than Carlton. They look a boiling hot mess. The media has been biting at their ankles for a while now. Dont see why this game should be any different. Cant pull up your socks if you dont have any. 

    be very verrryyyy  careful about saying things like that  !!!   ;)

     
    34 minutes ago, Deebauched said:

    Probably more chance of the umpires coming out firing than Carlton. They look a boiling hot mess. The media has been biting at their ankles for a while now. Dont see why this game should be any different. Cant pull up your socks if you dont have any. 

    Especially the poor excuse for footy socks these days. Hats off to JHF for sticking with the long socks

    I'd be wearing the thickest socks I could find if somebody was biting at my ankles.  Maybe even two pairs.


    4 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

    It could go one of two ways

    Have felt that way about every game this year, JNM 😀

    Wonder what we will do with selection this week. In the first half of this season, except for the first few rounds, we have not had a settled effective setup with our tall forwards. While some on here and even our esteemed coach site the fact that we have scored the most points of any team so far this season, we have only played three teams presently in the top eight and lost to all of them. we have scored our points in 8 wins against teams in the bottom 10. Not a reflection of a good effective forward setup.

    Some here also look at the delivery into the forward 50 as an excuse. To me it is a bit of a chicken and egg issue. Could our delivery be better? Of course it could be but it would help if we had a settled structure to the forwards and then it would give the deliverers a clear idea of what was happening ahead.

    So what to do over the Wednesday night cheese platters? Where to start?

    Midfield, always a good place to start, as that is where the ball starts with a bounce. Oliver is out for another week so we need to get more run and cover in the midfield. Hunter comes back but do we slot him back in straight away? Langdon looked better last week and Gus had a very good game playing back on the wing. Same set up this week?

    Do we persist with Gawn and Grundy in the same team?

    Petracca, Viney, Sparrow, Pickett, ANB, Rivers, Harmes and Laurie all rotating through the midfield at times. Langdon, Jordon, Brayshaw and Woewodin to the wings with the last three to have time on the ball as well.

    In the defence we have a pretty good structure with May and Lever as the kingpins. I am of the opinion that Petty, when fit, returns to the back line as we look a lot better with him there beside the other two. With him injured, we may look at Tomlinson for this match and possibly the next. He did a good job at the back when required earlier in the season and I think we will need tall options against the Blues. Rivers and Salem back there and a choice of two of Hibberd, Bowey and McVee.

    Forwards are a problem and have been for the last few seasons. Even in 21 we looked fragile up the pointy end during the season. 

    I would keep Spargo in there and drop Chandler. Chandler has been good but he has not been as effective in the last couple of games and might need a freshen up. Fritsch is there, of course. ANB and Pickett will spend time there. The rest??? A lot of questions. Dr Seuss, in one of his books has The Cat In The Hat saying to someone "Sometimes the questions is complicated and the answer is simple." If we accept that, then the reciprocal is also true. "Sometimes the question is simple and the answer is complicated." 

    Unfortunately, we suffer from the later when discussing the forward setup.

    I think there a a lot of versions of an answer but no idea how effective they might be.

    Anyway.... this is the way I would go for the Blues game.

    Backs: Hibberd, May, Rivers

    HB: Lever, Tomlinson, Salem

    C: Langdon, Sparrow, Brayshaw

    HF: Spargo, Grundy, Pickett

    F: JVR, Brown, Fristch

    Fol: Gawn, Petracca, Viney

    IC: Bowey, Jordon, Harmes, Laurie, Woewodin ( One selected as sub)

    McVee having a rest

     

    18 minutes ago, Demonland said:

     

    The AFL will look to apply ad-hoc equalisation methods beginning tonight by clearing Cerra for his dump tackle. 

    • Like 1
    • Clap 1

    21 minutes ago, CHF said:

    Wonder what we will do with selection this week. In the first half of this season, except for the first few rounds, we have not had a settled effective setup with our tall forwards. While some on here and even our esteemed coach site the fact that we have scored the most points of any team so far this season, we have only played three teams presently in the top eight and lost to all of them. we have scored our points in 8 wins against teams in the bottom 10. Not a reflection of a good effective forward setup.

    A good post but just highlighting this. I understand your argument but it’s not entirely correct. 

    We scored 115 vs the Dogs. The only time they’ve conceded 100, and indeed they have only conceded more than 71 two other times. 

    We scored 82 against Brisbane, albeit much of that was after the restart. But Collingwood’s 83 is the only higher score they’ve conceded at the Gabba. 

    We scored 134 against Sydney with their full backline playing. The only other two games they’ve had their full backline they conceded less than that combined. 

    We scored 76 against Port in the rain. The Dogs also played Port in the rain and scored 56.

    We scored 90 against GC on the GC who are playing pretty well at home. 

    Anyway, I know we’ve had big scores against the bottom 3 sides but I don’t think we’ve been completely impotent against the better sides. 

    • Like 4

    Bring in T Mac

    2 weeks later 

    Bring in BB FFS!

    and repeat

    34 minutes ago, CHF said:

    Wonder what we will do with selection this week. In the first half of this season, except for the first few rounds, we have not had a settled effective setup with our tall forwards. While some on here and even our esteemed coach site the fact that we have scored the most points of any team so far this season, we have only played three teams presently in the top eight and lost to all of them. we have scored our points in 8 wins against teams in the bottom 10. Not a reflection of a good effective forward setup.

    Some here also look at the delivery into the forward 50 as an excuse. To me it is a bit of a chicken and egg issue. Could our delivery be better? Of course it could be but it would help if we had a settled structure to the forwards and then it would give the deliverers a clear idea of what was happening ahead.

    So what to do over the Wednesday night cheese platters? Where to start?

    Midfield, always a good place to start, as that is where the ball starts with a bounce. Oliver is out for another week so we need to get more run and cover in the midfield. Hunter comes back but do we slot him back in straight away? Langdon looked better last week and Gus had a very good game playing back on the wing. Same set up this week?

    Do we persist with Gawn and Grundy in the same team?

    Petracca, Viney, Sparrow, Pickett, ANB, Rivers, Harmes and Laurie all rotating through the midfield at times. Langdon, Jordon, Brayshaw and Woewodin to the wings with the last three to have time on the ball as well.

    In the defence we have a pretty good structure with May and Lever as the kingpins. I am of the opinion that Petty, when fit, returns to the back line as we look a lot better with him there beside the other two. With him injured, we may look at Tomlinson for this match and possibly the next. He did a good job at the back when required earlier in the season and I think we will need tall options against the Blues. Rivers and Salem back there and a choice of two of Hibberd, Bowey and McVee.

    Forwards are a problem and have been for the last few seasons. Even in 21 we looked fragile up the pointy end during the season. 

    I would keep Spargo in there and drop Chandler. Chandler has been good but he has not been as effective in the last couple of games and might need a freshen up. Fritsch is there, of course. ANB and Pickett will spend time there. The rest??? A lot of questions. Dr Seuss, in one of his books has The Cat In The Hat saying to someone "Sometimes the questions is complicated and the answer is simple." If we accept that, then the reciprocal is also true. "Sometimes the question is simple and the answer is complicated." 

    Unfortunately, we suffer from the later when discussing the forward setup.

    I think there a a lot of versions of an answer but no idea how effective they might be.

    Anyway.... this is the way I would go for the Blues game.

    Backs: Hibberd, May, Rivers

    HB: Lever, Tomlinson, Salem

    C: Langdon, Sparrow, Brayshaw

    HF: Spargo, Grundy, Pickett

    F: JVR, Brown, Fristch

    Fol: Gawn, Petracca, Viney

    IC: Bowey, Jordon, Harmes, Laurie, Woewodin ( One selected as sub)

    McVee having a rest

     

    Hunter will come back in.

    9 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

    Let me get in first...

    A good post but just highlighting this. I understand your argument but it’s not entirely correct. 

    We scored 115 vs the Dogs. The only time they’ve conceded 100, and indeed they have only conceded more than 71 two other times. 

    Game one - doesnt count

    We scored 82 against Brisbane, albeit much of that was after the restart. But Collingwood’s 83 is the only higher score they’ve conceded at the Gabba. 

    Game two - we still lost - doesnt count

    We scored 134 against Sydney with their full backline playing. The only other two games they’ve had their full backline they conceded less than that combined. 

    This is the exception that proves the rule

    We scored 76 against Port in the rain. The Dogs also played Port in the rain and scored 56.

    We didn't play for 3 quarters - so its a shambles up the front, so doesnt count

    We scored 90 against GC on the GC who are playing pretty well at home. 

    But we almost lost... and as we conceded effectively the same amount, so doesnt count.

    Anyway, I know we’ve had big scores against the bottom 3 sides but I don’t think we’ve been completely impotent against the better sides. 

    Is this how its done?

     

    Edited by Engorged Onion

    • Haha 2

    Oh no the Carlton Lawyers have brought out the long hair defense. How can you tell if his head hits the ground when his hair is so long.

    • Haha 3
    7 minutes ago, YearOfTheDees said:

    Oh no the Carlton Lawyers have brought out the long hair defense. How can you tell if his head hits the ground when his hair is so long.

    If the player's action has the potential to cause concussion then it's a stick on guilty verdict surely. Isn't that what got Kozzie rubbed out for a fortnight? 

    Edited by Rab D Nesbitt

    • Like 3

    Parker upheld for a lesser tackle. Cerra is no chance of getting off..

    • Like 3
    • Haha 1
     
    8 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    McVee's been good in most games and I'd have to re-watch the game to determine if he was beaten on the day. He certainly had a low impact possession game (as did his senior mates down back).

    Chandler has been well down since the North win and I was hoping he would respond with a 2-3 goal game and 12+ touches. Instead he got 0 and 6 and was subbed off.

    I do think Chandler is at real risk of getting dropped this week.

     

    I've re-watched the game up to 3/4 time (not that keen to proceed). I haven't seen an issue with McVee's game other than he doesn't get enough of the footy. When he does get it, he usually does something good to great with it. He makes few mistakes, is super clean and hits targets in good positions. He's just a young player trying to play his role. With experience and confidence, he'll take on the game more.

    I also didn't see a lot wrong with Chandler's game other than low impact. There was no lack of endeavour/pressure and he didn't do a lot wrong when he was involved, but he just wasn't that involved. Whether that was his issue or symptomatic of how the game unfolded is another matter.

    • Like 3

    Has Cerra been cleared yet?


    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Thumb Down
        • Haha
      • 207 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • 273 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Geelong

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 56 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All