Jump to content

Featured Replies

11 minutes ago, grazman said:

As suggested OTC last night, unless Freo can offer a really good trade - I'd be inclined if I were the Lions to make Neale stay for at least one more year of that contract and if he wants to be traded at the end of next year then he can be without them having been blindsided.  

I understand COVID has changed the parameters somewhat, but I think the whole family angle is slightly overplayed and another 12 months would be quite manageable for most families.  Though far from ideal (but what is in this world) or not really understanding the nature of the circumstances of Neale and his partner, we do live in a modern first world country where he has been handsomely remunerated for his talents, and where it is likely (but not certain) that restrictions once we reach a vaccination threshold will be relaxed. 

You're on hundreds of thousands of dollars if you're Neale. Being a recent parent myself, being in lockdown the way we are, it's effectively the same thing as being interstate. It's not ideal, but it's manageable and my business is certainly not doing as well as Lachie Neale's deal would be doing for their young family. 

I reckon the Lions need to stand firm...

 

No one is mentioning the Eagles?  Probably because they are going to the draft so not interested in another mature age player who is starting to have injuries..

Apparently, the only suitor is Freo.  How much do they want him, especially after he walked out on them?  He was their reigning 2 time b n f winner.  And at what cost?

He is hardly a good role model for a young team.  It would be difficult for him to talk of loyalty, commitment, sacrifice, comradeship, integrity etc.  All the things that bind.

Neale may have to stay at the Lions.  By the sound of it he will have bridges to mend if he does.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

i've always thought damon greaves was capable of playing afl level and just got unlucky that the hawks had impey, jiath, scrimshaw, day, hardwick all at HB already, but maybe i just liked his name, his hair colour and his jumper number (44) all combo'd up, could be in the mix as a rebounding small defender around the comp as a DFA

 
5 minutes ago, Nascent said:

Luke Parker has signed a 4 year extension with the swans that will take him to 33. Their cap is said to be tight with players like Dawson, Stephens and Hewitt mentioned as possible players on the move.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/675030/swan-for-life-skipper-signs-long-term-deal-rejects-free-agency

 

Bit of a gamble. Not sure if he's still a gun at 33


Just a thought on a possible 3 way trade. 

Melbourne send Weideman to Gold Coast.

Gold Coast send Rankine to Adelaide.

Adelaide send McAsey to Melbourne. 

Gold Coast are in need of a ready made key forward, while Melbourne have surplus key forwards and Weideman is kicking up a stink at not getting a game. While Rankine has been very underwhelming given where he was selected in the draft, and many have speculated a move back to his home town in Adelaide. I think it's a win win for all clubs. 

Fischer McAsey was taken #6 in the draft a couple of years ago and  has barely had a look in at Adelaide as it's already been well stated that he wants to move back to Victoria. He's a gun key defender/forward and only 20 years of age so that gives us time to let him build in the reserves while Brown and McDonald are holding down the key forward posts in the firsts. 

3 minutes ago, Caligula's cohort said:

Just a thought on a possible 3 way trade. 

Melbourne send Weideman to Gold Coast.

Gold Coast send Rankine to Adelaide.

Adelaide send McAsey to Melbourne. 

Gold Coast are in need of a ready made key forward, while Melbourne have surplus key forwards and Weideman is kicking up a stink at not getting a game. While Rankine has been very underwhelming given where he was selected in the draft, and many have speculated a move back to his home town in Adelaide. I think it's a win win for all clubs. 

Fischer McAsey was taken #6 in the draft a couple of years ago and  has barely had a look in at Adelaide as it's already been well stated that he wants to move back to Victoria. He's a gun key defender/forward and only 20 years of age so that gives us time to let him build in the reserves while Brown and McDonald are holding down the key forward posts in the firsts. 

Has he played much on the forward line?

Also, why is he not getting games at lowly Adelaide?

5 minutes ago, Caligula's cohort said:

Just a thought on a possible 3 way trade. 

Melbourne send Weideman to Gold Coast.

Gold Coast send Rankine to Adelaide.

Adelaide send McAsey to Melbourne. 

Gold Coast are in need of a ready made key forward, while Melbourne have surplus key forwards and Weideman is kicking up a stink at not getting a game. While Rankine has been very underwhelming given where he was selected in the draft, and many have speculated a move back to his home town in Adelaide. I think it's a win win for all clubs. 

Fischer McAsey was taken #6 in the draft a couple of years ago and  has barely had a look in at Adelaide as it's already been well stated that he wants to move back to Victoria. He's a gun key defender/forward and only 20 years of age so that gives us time to let him build in the reserves while Brown and McDonald are holding down the key forward posts in the firsts. 

Interesting… not sure on McAsey as haven’t seen him play. But the GC leg of that trade would need a bit of sauce. Weed for Rankine is underwhelming for them.

Edited by CYB

 
11 minutes ago, Demon Head said:

Has he played much on the forward line?

Also, why is he not getting games at lowly Adelaide?

He's considered more a gun defender but he can play forward. In any case, we can move Petty forward if need be.

11 minutes ago, CYB said:

Interesting… not sure on McAsey as haven’t seen him play. But the GC leg of that trade would need a bit of sauce. Weed for Rankine is underwhelming for them.

I agree... GC would need a bit more, but on current output, Rankine has done nothing so far... he has all the talent and skill but has struggled since arriving there. I think if GC see a Weideman/King combo they would take it. 


3 minutes ago, Caligula's cohort said:

I agree... GC would need a bit more, but on current output, Rankine has done nothing so far... he has all the talent and skill but has struggled since arriving there. I think if GC see a Weideman/King combo they would take it. 

Rankine is the type of player that would thrive in a strong team as a bit/impact player.  What is required of him at GC is above his mental agility at the moment. 

35 minutes ago, Caligula's cohort said:

Melbourne have surplus key forwards and Weideman is kicking up a stink at not getting a game.

Who are all these "surplus" key forwards and what makes you think Weid is "kicking up a stink"?

1 hour ago, Caligula's cohort said:

Just a thought on a possible 3 way trade. 

Melbourne send Weideman to Gold Coast.

Gold Coast send Rankine to Adelaide.

Adelaide send McAsey to Melbourne. 

Gold Coast are in need of a ready made key forward, while Melbourne have surplus key forwards and Weideman is kicking up a stink at not getting a game. While Rankine has been very underwhelming given where he was selected in the draft, and many have speculated a move back to his home town in Adelaide. I think it's a win win for all clubs. 

Fischer McAsey was taken #6 in the draft a couple of years ago and  has barely had a look in at Adelaide as it's already been well stated that he wants to move back to Victoria. He's a gun key defender/forward and only 20 years of age so that gives us time to let him build in the reserves while Brown and McDonald are holding down the key forward posts in the firsts. 

That would be a terrible trade. Why on earth do we want McAsey? Can't get a game at Adelaide no thanks. Weideman and all our existing draft picks for Cerra is a juicier deal. I don't want to but throw in Sparrow if that was to get us over the line.

9 hours ago, Nascent said:

Luke Parker has signed a 4 year extension with the swans that will take him to 33. Their cap is said to be tight with players like Dawson, Stephens and Hewitt mentioned as possible players on the move.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/675030/swan-for-life-skipper-signs-long-term-deal-rejects-free-agency

 

He is 29 next month. A 4 year deal is crazy. There must have been some serious interest. 
he looks the type that might slow down after 30 but who knows 

13 hours ago, Caligula's cohort said:

Just a thought on a possible 3 way trade. 

Melbourne send Weideman to Gold Coast.

Gold Coast send Rankine to Adelaide.

Adelaide send McAsey to Melbourne. 

Gold Coast are in need of a ready made key forward, while Melbourne have surplus key forwards and Weideman is kicking up a stink at not getting a game. While Rankine has been very underwhelming given where he was selected in the draft, and many have speculated a move back to his home town in Adelaide. I think it's a win win for all clubs. 

Fischer McAsey was taken #6 in the draft a couple of years ago and  has barely had a look in at Adelaide as it's already been well stated that he wants to move back to Victoria. He's a gun key defender/forward and only 20 years of age so that gives us time to let him build in the reserves while Brown and McDonald are holding down the key forward posts in the firsts. 

Weideman is kicking up a stink at not getting a game. 

Is he kicking up a stink??

If so best way forward is to hold a few marks improve your attack on the ball improve your body language and KIck some  goals


On 9/7/2021 at 3:56 PM, Lucifer's Hero said:

No one is mentioning the Eagles?  Probably because they are going to the draft so not interested in another mature age player who is starting to have injuries..

Apparently, the only suitor is Freo.  How much do they want him, especially after he walked out on them?  He was their reigning 2 time b n f winner.  And at what cost?

He is hardly a good role model for a young team.  It would be difficult for him to talk of loyalty, commitment, sacrifice, comradeship, integrity etc.  All the things that bind.

Neale may have to stay at the Lions.  By the sound of it he will have bridges to mend if he does.

WC don’t have the draft capital and also have no cap space and will definitely lose players this trade period. 

Edited by Demons11

16 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

WC don’t have the draft capital and also have no cap space and will definitely lose players this trade period. 

They have picks 10, 29 plus future 1st (likely to be 8 - 12 range).  However, they are opting for the draft rather than trade in players.  They need to rejuvenate their list.

My point was that Freo is the only party potentially interested.

On 9/6/2021 at 11:29 AM, Pollyanna said:

I think Cerra would be a great get and I agree that Oliver and Petracca are critical members of our midfield.

But I don't think we're as thin as you believe.  Sure we would suffer if one of them went down but we have Brayshaw on the wing to come back into the midfield and Viney, Harmes, JJ and Sparrow who have all proven themselves capable and the latter two will only be better next year.

For example: Petracca, Brayshaw, Viney, Harmes, Sparrow in the middle and JJ to the wing is still competitive 

I don't think we need to sell the farm to get Cerra which is what it may take.

Not saying that Sparrow is on par with Oliver or Petracca, but he looks as if he is well on trajectory to become a B+ or A grader in the next year or two. 

1 hour ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Adelaide’s Jake Kelly is on the radar of North Melbourne as the free agent considers a return to Victoria. 

North Just happy to sign a J Kelly, they don't care who now


L N staying at Brisbane.!!! Glad to hear this.!!!

 
11 hours ago, DubDee said:

He is 29 next month. A 4 year deal is crazy. There must have been some serious interest. 
he looks the type that might slow down after 30 but who knows 

There was. His manager was doing the rounds a bit.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 185 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 438 replies