Jump to content

VDB/CHUNK

IRW
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

Fair dinkum Vanders is a lumbering liability and still has the skill and decision making deficit of the earlier Goodwin Demons iteration. 

Someone said yesterday the game has passed him by.

I said  the same thing about Jones  after the Finals win at the G in ...( whenever it was;who can tell these days?) against Hawthorn ,but seriously does anyone not think he would be a better inclusion than the frustration  that is Vanders.He can stop any fluid ball movement without even trying 

But Nathan Jones?

A red hot go (firstly as the medical sub), he can kick a goal and he would give it full throttle like no other player on the list to get a shot at the flag in his last game.

It wouldn't even be sentimental  (unless he holds the Cup), just a smart move

 

Edited by IRW
Correction

  • Quote
    • Like 3
     

    Glad your still alive IRW, …..I believe the club was just trying to drag Vandunburg over the Fifty game line, like a service medal type thing.

  • Quote

    I think we saw our squad running after the game last night.  Daw, Weiderman, Smith, Viney, Chandler, Hibberd along with the 23 that played and TMac.  Jones will be training his [censored] off to ensure he is ready should he get the call up but with no VFL it really makes it hard.

    I'm assuming we are having scratch matches with other AFL clubs like we did last year to keep the players that miss out match fit.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    8 minutes ago, bluey said:

    Glad your still alive IRW, …..I believe the club was just trying to drag Vandunburg over the Fifty game line, like a service medal type thing.

    I believe last night was his 50th

  • Quote

    Jones for mine

  • Quote
    • Like 5

    Neither. Too slow. Our game is built on defensive pressure. I’d have Sparrow ahead of them both. Viney will come straight back in to, so unless we have a lot of injuries I think they are both well down the pecking order.

    I think we planned for a very wet night last night, and might have been surprised at how dry the game became in the 2nd quarter. VDB got the nod for the rain, and that reason alone.

  • Quote
    • Like 6
     

    Depends on the role:

    Wing/on ball - Vanders
    Half forward/touch of wing - Jones
    Sub - Jones (just).

    Vanders had some rough moments in the 2nd quarter adjusting to the tempo of the game but he was ok in the second half. 

    His size and straight line speed are still assets, both in defending and attacking in straight lines. Unfortunately the wheels have copped horrendous damage over the years and the steering is a struggle.

    Also at least one of those free kicks were rubbish. Can't be rewarding guys for sliding in to opponents and getting high free kicks with no contact initiated by the defending player. That's play on.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    1 hour ago, bluey said:

    Glad your still alive IRW, …..I believe the club was just trying to drag Vandunburg over the Fifty game line, like a service medal type thing.

    Cmon Bluey do really think that would be selections front of mind for a guy to get to 50 games when there’s a top 4 spot & possibly a flag to be won.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Shocked 1

    Others are ahead of both, but of the 2, Jones easily. Vanders lack of footy IQ is consistently alarming.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    I'm a big believer in Smith being our medical sub during the finals.

    If a mid goes down they can be better covered than a KPP.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    It seems like VDB has lost a lot of his pace and his closing speed when making tackles was a big part of his game. Probably unlikely that he plays a part in our finals campaign and he's coming out of contract - could be at risk of not being offered an extension.

    I get the romanticism, but I also can't see Jones as being part of our best combination on the harder faster September grounds; the caveat being that conditions are wet and slippery - then maybe bring him in for extra grunt.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Sadly, Vandenberg looks slow, clumsy and confused out there and simply doesn't have enough 'upside' to justify trying to build some form into him this close to an attack on the premiership.

    It's an easier call than Melksham, who at least did the things he was in the team to do (2 goals, 2 goal assists) but he didn't really contribute to the essential forward pressure and those dumb free kicks in the final quarter were momentum-swinging.

    Neither are really in our best 22 and I'll be watching for news on Jones' progress intensely because if he can get his gears working smoothly then we want his head and heart on the field for finals.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    44 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

    I'm a big believer in Smith being our medical sub during the finals.

    If a mid goes down they can be better covered than a KPP.

    Not a huge fan of Smith as either a starting forward or defender - but as a sub this makes a lot of sense. Offers more flexibility than almost anyone else not in the starting 22. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    I’ll reserve judgment as I think it’s unfair to judge a player subbed into a game.  Very difficult for players to shine under those circumstances.

    I don’t believe he’s currently best 22, but he’s certainly best 30 and arguably has more versatility than Jones.  Melksham’s performance last night has made it very difficult for both of them.

    If Viney, Jordon and Sparrow are fit and available, they may both sit out September.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Even the ultimate reward will be somewhat diminished if Jones is not a part of the team and gets to put his hand on the cup.

    Rest him so that he is in prime condition and we can be sure that there will be no-one with more desire and effort on the day, if it comes.

    I vote for Jones.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    2 hours ago, drdrake said:

    I think we saw our squad running after the game last night.  Daw, Weiderman, Smith, Viney, Chandler, Hibberd along with the 23 that played and TMac. 

    Just curious as to what that was about. Was there a point to it, having all the guys who didn’t play running around after the game? I actually liked it; loved seeing Weids’ big smile. 😊 

  • Quote

    If either are playing, it's due to injury. I'm on record with my views on both Jones and Vanders, so I don't feel the need to say anymore.

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

    Depends on the role:

    Wing/on ball - Vanders
    Half forward/touch of wing - Jones
    Sub - Jones (just).

    Vanders had some rough moments in the 2nd quarter adjusting to the tempo of the game but he was ok in the second half. 

    His size and straight line speed are still assets, both in defending and attacking in straight lines. Unfortunately the wheels have copped horrendous damage over the years and the steering is a struggle.

    Also at least one of those free kicks were rubbish. Can't be rewarding guys for sliding in to opponents and getting high free kicks with no contact initiated by the defending player. That's play on.

     

    Gave away a free kick for in the back that he didn't need to tackle as ball was not in dispute and cost us a goal - dumb play

  • Quote

    1 minute ago, A F said:

    If either are playing, it's due to injury. I'm on record with my views on both Jones and Vanders, so I don't feel the need to say anymore.

    Neither are good enough or quick enough - game has past them both

  • Quote

    Sadly dont think we will get to see Nathan play in front of Melbourne  supporters crowd again

  • Quote
    • Shocked 1
    • Sad 2
    25 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    Just curious as to what that was about. Was there a point to it, having all the guys who didn’t play running around after the game? I actually liked it; loved seeing Weids’ big smile. 😊 

    Assume they missed game time this weekend and Burgo just wanted them to have a run. Similar to how unused substitutes in soccer often do some fitness after the game. Uncertain why they were in full kit though. That was the only confusing part aha 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     

     

    I won’t be popular for saying it, but I never thought Jones was that good – he was just in a very poor team. I don’t think he chases nearly hard enough, and that is such a major part of our game.

     

    I have always liked VDB but he wasn’t great last night, but given the amount of football he has missed in the last year or so, he was always going to be very rusty. I say, give him another chance because his capacity to stick a tackle and hurt with it is enormously helpful to us.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
    38 minutes ago, roy11 said:

    Assume they missed game time this weekend and Burgo just wanted them to have a run. Similar to how unused substitutes in soccer often do some fitness after the game. Uncertain why they were in full kit though. That was the only confusing part aha 

    I thought it was great!  To me, it was kinda like telling these boys that, even though they didn't play, they were still an important part of the team as the travelling emergencies, and so had earned the right to have a run on the ground in their full playing gear, while doing their required extra running.  A  nice touch by whoever thought of it.  (A choppo thing, maybe??)

  • Quote
    • Like 4

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Haha
        • Like
      • 176 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 47 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

      After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 328 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: St. Kilda

      Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

        • Like
      • 31 replies
      Demonland
    View All