Jump to content


Recommended Posts


Posted

If Langdon is ok, no change. Weid took his chances and even melk laid a tackle or two.

  • Like 2

Posted

So it was Langdon?   Subbed off in the dying minutes?  

IF so then they must surely think has a 2 week injury.

Would be a huge out.  Who would replace him on a wing?  Maybe Hunt??

But as to changes -  Melksham mostly bog ordinary but it takes a lot to have him dropped.

Posted

looked like a dislocated finger? maybe, if i was to guess

changes: 

OUT: Hunt

IN: Bowey/Lockhart

its tight for spots you have to play well to stay in. and you'd think we're ok for finals from here so why not see what one of these boys have got in them. weid would have been in the gun first half but got on the end of a few later on

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, monoccular said:

So it was Langdon?   Subbed off in the dying minutes?  

IF so then they must surely think has a 2 week injury.

Would be a huge out.  Who would replace him on a wing?  Maybe Hunt??

But as to changes -  Melksham mostly bog ordinary but it takes a lot to have him dropped.

I'd Langdon was to be out Baker is a walk up start for the winG,  take it to the bank.

  • Like 2

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Turner said:

looked like a dislocated finger? maybe, if i was to guess

changes: 

OUT: Hunt

IN: Bowey/Lockhart

its tight for spots you have to play well to stay in. and you'd think we're ok for finals from here so why not see what one of these boys have got in them. weid would have been in the gun first half but got on the end of a few later on

Hunt is part of the back 6 that is absolutely humming and he gave JJ from the dogs an absolute bath tonight 

Edited by Demons11
  • Like 17
Posted

no change.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

We just played our most complete game of the season against a team most predicted to beat us, on a ground they dont lose at.

So, pending Langdon... NO CHANGE! 

Edited by JTR
  • Like 7

Posted
1 minute ago, Demons11 said:

Hunt is part of the back 6 that is absolutely humming and he can JJ from the dogs an absolute bath tonight 

Absolutely.  Hunt was also important.  Played his role. 

  • Like 1
Posted

A few struggled at times (Weideman, Jackson, Hunt, Melksham) but no one played so badly to warrant being dropped IMO.

No change unless injury.

(if Langdon's out next week vs Brisbane that will hurt, big time).

  • Like 5

Posted
2 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

Hunt is part of the back 6 that is absolutely humming and he can JJ from the dogs an absolute bath tonight 

jj's not a forward, just been shoved there to fit him in, don't think he really challenged hunt to defend him at all. hunt definitely didnt do anything the other two boys couldn't do and on current form i'd back them to offer more offensively this week. if it doesn't pay off in a couple weeks theres always the option to reverse it. but we need to keep the senior boys accountable and show the guys below that if you're in form we will reward you

  • Like 1
Posted

No change

  • Like 1

Posted
1 minute ago, Turner said:

jj's not a forward, just been shoved there to fit him in, don't think he really challenged hunt to defend him at all. hunt definitely didnt do anything the other two boys couldn't do and on current form i'd back them to offer more offensively this week. if it doesn't pay off in a couple weeks theres always the option to reverse it. but we need to keep the senior boys accountable and show the guys below that if you're in form we will reward you

JJ has been going very well 

  • Like 1
Posted

Out: Weid, Langdon (if injured)
In: B.Brown, Baker

In some ways I'd like to keep Weid in to build his confidence, but at the same time it's important to drive standards, and Brown deserves a chance to build confidence in the 1s as well. Looking forward, Viney comes into this team but I have no idea at who's expense.

  • Like 3

Posted

No change unless Viney is ok, but I have no idea who to drop to let him in.


Posted
1 minute ago, Demons11 said:

JJ has been going very well 

agree to disagree ?, would be lucky to make their full strength side imo when dunkley, treloar, vandemeer, mclean, wood are fit

image.thumb.png.cf32a9b2cf7f4b8084240948886f6742.png

Posted

Id drop weed.

But I admit I may not be very objective.

Backed the dees over 39 points.

He shanked a shot to make it 42 points. Then his next two kicks, both of which should have set up scoring shots, were dead set clangers.

Id still drop him. One tackle. And 10 half jogs and coraaling.

Four possessions is rubbish.

Sure 3 goals, but 2 were gifts. And he dropped mutiple marks that he should have swallowed 

  • Like 14
  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
  • Angry 1

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...