Jump to content


Recommended Posts


Posted
7 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

....and he doesn't even cop a fine?

sweet jaisus

Gus must be feeling a bit mystified right now, gets a fine for an accidental trip but Fritta’s accidental head high gets nothing at all. ?

  • Haha 6
  • Shocked 1

Posted

Well done MFC stood up for your man and showed that he is no thug, the kid is a star and great ball player.

Good for you Bailey Fritsch.!!!!!!

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1
  • Love 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

The problem with point one is there is no such conduct/grading as accidental. It's either intentional or careless and Christian gave him the lesser grading of careless.

 

Accidental means no case to answer homie, which is what the Tribunal ruled. Case closed.

  • Like 3

Posted
17 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Gerard and Slobbo think the AFL should appeal. Clowns.

surely there is no way known the afl would take legal or otherwise advice from someone like slobbo

  • Haha 6
Posted
20 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

I’m still in shock that the player who hit him behind play didn’t even get looked at.

Well really very obvious.  
 

Foxtel commentators didn’t see it as part of their agenda of the day, so not only hardly mentioned it when it happened, but didn’t harp on it over and over again, with multiple replays etc. 

  • Like 3

Posted
6 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Well really very obvious.  
 

Foxtel commentators didn’t see it as part of their agenda of the day, so not only hardly mentioned it when it happened, but didn’t harp on it over and over again, with multiple replays etc. 

If the AFL wants to appeal anything perhaps it should be that, behind the ball, high contact, player unsuspecting. 

  • Like 4

Posted
42 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

fantastique result

now we can go back to working out whether t mac back and weed in is better than petty in and plugger stays forward

Let’s have a poll!

  • Like 2
Posted

Nobody has raised the obvious outcome from this decision being that Frittata is still eligible for the Brownlow!

  • Like 2
Posted

I didn't notice the push that Trac did which put Powell in fritters path.

Reminded me of the push of the crows player into viney and the outcry that followed that hearing!


Posted (edited)

When was the last time the MFC appealed a tribunal outcome, let alone won one??  Rumpole or Mr Leg over to you!

Edited by Rusty Nails
  • Like 1

Posted (edited)

AFL 360 is definitely not required viewing in this household! We find both 'gentlemen'  repugnant on so many levels.

 

laurel and hardy dancing GIF

Edited by Tarax Club
apologies to Stan and Ollie
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Love 2
  • Haha 3
Posted
Just now, dee-tox said:

And while the tribunal are at it, they can reverse the three week Jack Trengove suspension for a sling tackle!

Never Forget GIF

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 4

Posted
3 minutes ago, demonstone said:

Rumpole of the Old Bayley?

Rumpole of the Bailey good sir!

200.gif

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, Tarax Club said:

AFL 360 is definitely not required viewing in this household! We find both 'gentlemen'  repugnant on so many levels.

 

laurel and hardy dancing GIF

One of the rare people with good taste who can't stand Whateley too. Very nice.

  • Like 5

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...