Jump to content

Mark Maclure "Soft Culture" Comments



Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Axis of Bob said:

He's just speaking in generalities that can't ever be proven or disproven. It's extremely lazy. His evidence of poor culture is senior players not being dropped (which I'm sure Tom McDonald disagrees with).

The only reason he is still kept around in the footy media is because he has name recognition and because his low analysis populism appeals to a certain subset of the population who relate to what he says. It's easy to come up with his comments, which I'll do for any team that lost this weekend:

  • Bad culture
  • They're soft and don't go hard enough at the contest
  • Lazy and don't work hard enough
  • Bad gameplan
  • Players look lost
  • Players don't want to win enough
  • Coach is out of ideas and has no plan B
  • Not fit enough
  • Players unmotivated or 'not switched on'

It's completely unprovable, but just panders to many supporters' existing feelings. It's like reading your horoscope. If you put generalities out there without any evidence (or knowledge) then people will just insert their own preconceptions into it. 

If you want to see how this sort of thinking works, just check out this forum after a loss. 

forget the weekend

  • Bad culture
  • They're soft and don't go hard enough at the contest
  • Lazy and don't work hard enough
  • Bad gameplan
  • Players look lost
  • Players don't want to win enough
  • Coach is out of ideas and has no plan B
  • Not fit enough
  • Players unmotivated or 'not switched on'

Every one of these apply to our past two seasons.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Half forward flank said:

hugs at this time of the year are like giving every kid who participated a medal. promote the wrong culture at this time of year. 

Kid is just back from his mum’s funeral.  Think it showed care and consideration.  He did not play in the game at Drivel stadium.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Half forward flank said:

forget the weekend

  • Bad culture
  • They're soft and don't go hard enough at the contest
  • Lazy and don't work hard enough
  • Bad gameplan
  • Players look lost
  • Players don't want to win enough
  • Coach is out of ideas and has no plan B
  • Not fit enough
  • Players unmotivated or 'not switched on'

Every one of these apply to our past two seasons.

Maybe - but I think you'll find that these criticisms would have been leveled at every team over the last few years.  Richmond copped plenty last year and went on to win the flag.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, sue said:

I am always impressed by those who think they can distinguish (from the outside) some cultural problem from a simple lack of skills which are obvious to all who watch the game.  No amount of  culture will turn a team of unskilled players into a champion team. 

My belief is that our skills look poor because of our lack of defensive intensity. When we have applied high levels of pressure to our opponents, we create turnovers in situations where we can break away and have more time and space, hence it's easier to hit targets.

Our defensive intensity back, forward and in the middle is very poor.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


7 minutes ago, Axis of Bob said:

He's just speaking in generalities that can't ever be proven or disproven. It's extremely lazy. His evidence of poor culture is senior players not being dropped (which I'm sure Tom McDonald disagrees with).

The only reason he is still kept around in the footy media is because he has name recognition and because his low analysis populism appeals to a certain subset of the population who relate to what he says. It's easy to come up with his comments, which I'll do for any team that lost this weekend:

  • Bad culture
  • They're soft and don't go hard enough at the contest
  • Lazy and don't work hard enough
  • Bad gameplan
  • Players look lost
  • Players don't want to win enough
  • Coach is out of ideas and has no plan B
  • Not fit enough
  • Players unmotivated or 'not switched on'

It's completely unprovable, but just panders to many supporters' existing feelings. It's like reading your horoscope. If you put generalities out there without any evidence (or knowledge) then people will just insert their own preconceptions into it. 

If you want to see how this sort of thinking works, just check out this forum after a loss. 

Great post, couldn't have put it better. I have confidence in the club and the players continuing to improve.

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Half forward flank said:

forget the weekend

  • Bad culture
  • They're soft and don't go hard enough at the contest
  • Lazy and don't work hard enough
  • Bad gameplan
  • Players look lost
  • Players don't want to win enough
  • Coach is out of ideas and has no plan B
  • Not fit enough
  • Players unmotivated or 'not switched on'

Every one of these apply to our past two seasons.

As I said, it's low-analysis populism. It resonates with those who don't like to think too hard, like Maclure.

  • Like 4
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think commentators saying a club's culture is soft is just lazy journalism.

Max Gawn is a 4 time all-australian and the best ruckman in the competition, does Mclure honestly think he isn't giving it 100% every time he runs out and also trying to help his teammates?

What is frustrating is the following:

Our list management - Why didn't we go after Phillips after missing out on Smith? Why didn't we go after Butler when it was so obvious we had no quality small forwards? Why have we not put foot skills as a high priority until now? 

Player development - Why did we move Fritsch from a forward line role to a backline a couple of years ago? Why did we move Harmes from a tagging role to half back? 

This has nothing to do with culture and everything to do with questionable list management and coaching decisions. 

 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Axis of Bob said:

As I said, it's low-analysis populism. It resonates with those who don't like to think too hard, like Maclure.

AB you may be right and if so that means for most of the last 56 years we have had poor players / average coaches. I actually think we have had the trifector. 

Edited by old dee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, sisso said:

Knives are already out after a practice match loss imagine what will happen if we lose in round 1 to a young interstate team with several key outs!

Suicide watch. Seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, old dee said:

AB you may be right and if so that means for most of the last 56 years we have had poor players / average coaches. I actually we have had the trifector. 

We have been bad for different reasons at different times. Combining them is lazy. 

Maclure is beyond lazy, intellectually. He's just there to make the viewer feel better about their own knowledge, although not necessarily for the same reasons.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's always talk about "culture" but hardly ever any attempt to define it. Some years ago Jude Bolton was generous enough to come down and speak to a Junior team I was coaching. We asked him to explain the famous Swans "Bloods Culture". He said when Roosy arrived he said to Stewy Maxfield the culture needs to be owned by the players. Maxfield created the Bloods Culture which in summary is:-

Don't ever let your mates down. Every time you walk through the door of the Club you give 100% to every training session and every game. Anything less is failing the culture. You could see from then on you knew you were going to get 100% effort every time.

Can you say you have the confidence to expect that every time MFC plays. The fact messages are coming out of the Club saying midfield egos have to be parked, says a lot about what the Club thinks about the culture. Maxy has been communicating a clear line about the players taking responsibility. Lets hope the players hold each other accountable to bring 100% every time. I'll believe it when I see Clary and Gus finally becoming defensive. I'll believe it when I see Langdon looking up and delivering passes to leading forwards instead of just bombing away like he did again v Dogs. I'll believe it when I see players gut running off the ball on defensive transition. 

Are we supporters the problem?  Do we not demand enough accountability from the footy dept and players. Are we different in that compared to the Cats, Hawks, Swans, TIgers?  I don't know but I wonder. 

Go Dees.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt we have a mentally soft culture. when the chips are down or we are on the verge of something good, we generally fail.

I want to see an angry team this year. I don't want people to 'like' Gawn, Viney, May, Lever, Clarry - I want them to respect and even fear them a bit. if I mess up, I'll get a bollocking. Every team does not need this for success but we certainly do. The A listers need to demand more, then the guys who coast like the 'Hunts' will naturally train harder, play harder, concentrate for longer. You need to be obsessed with success for it to come.

I cannot disagree with Mark's comments. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


36 minutes ago, Action Jackson said:

I think commentators saying a club's culture is soft is just lazy journalism.

Max Gawn is a 4 time all-australian and the best ruckman in the competition, does Mclure honestly think he isn't giving it 100% every time he runs out and also trying to help his teammates?

What is frustrating is the following:

Our list management - Why didn't we go after Phillips after missing out on Smith? Why didn't we go after Butler when it was so obvious we had no quality small forwards? Why have we not put foot skills as a high priority until now? 

Player development - Why did we move Fritsch from a forward line role to a backline a couple of years ago? Why did we move Harmes from a tagging role to half back? 

This has nothing to do with culture and everything to do with questionable list management and coaching decisions. 

 

is suspect the reason we didn't go after phillips and butler was simply money

our inability to trade tmac and release the necessary money didn't come off

consequently we had a pretty average to poor draft and trade outcome imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i see Cam Smith just announced his retirement. he comes from a different code but has been a big part of the strong winning culture at the Storm. i wonder if we could find a part time role for someone like him to come in and work with the players mindset and help build our culture into a winning one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calm down. We lost a practice match against a team that has us beaten for contested footy for the last 3-4 years - and we were missing 3 of our best 4 contested players.

The week before we beat the premiers in a practice match. Where were these comments then?

 

  • Like 4
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Demon Dude said:

i see Cam Smith just announced his retirement. he comes from a different code but has been a big part of the strong winning culture at the Storm. i wonder if we could find a part time role for someone like him to come in and work with the players mindset and help build our culture into a winning one.

Would be the best signing we’ve ever made on or off field.

He is besties with Clarko but is more likely to move to Gold Coast where his family have relocated to. 
 

Doesnt rule out a part time gig!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day we need our best players on the field for at least 75% of the season because our depth is obviously limited .

i can’t understand why we’re so maligned this week because an incredibly undermanned team beat the Premiership favourire 2 weeks ago and competed effectively for half a game against one of the Premiership favourites with an almost complete team last weekend.

Our weakness is our team depth, no more, no less. It is crap to blame ooor football skills on culture, or even the coach. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joeboy said:

At the end of the day we need our best players on the field for at least 75% of the season because our depth is obviously limited .

i can’t understand why we’re so maligned this week because an incredibly undermanned team beat the Premiership favourire 2 weeks ago and competed effectively for half a game against one of the Premiership favourites with an almost complete team last weekend.

Our weakness is our team depth, no more, no less. It is crap to blame ooor football skills on culture, or even the coach. 

So Poor game plan  poorly executed

poor player selection over many years

lazy footballers 

None of this exists

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, It's Time said:

There's always talk about "culture" but hardly ever any attempt to define it. Some years ago Jude Bolton was generous enough to come down and speak to a Junior team I was coaching. We asked him to explain the famous Swans "Bloods Culture". He said when Roosy arrived he said to Stewy Maxfield the culture needs to be owned by the players. Maxfield created the Bloods Culture which in summary is:-

Don't ever let your mates down. Every time you walk through the door of the Club you give 100% to every training session and every game. Anything less is failing the culture. You could see from then on you knew you were going to get 100% effort every time.

 

Lewis said much the same thing about the super successful hawks team he played in.

The players set and maintained the standards. Let their teammates know when those standards were not met and payers answered to each other when not met.

And also said the culture was different at the dees when he got there....

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    LIVE AND LET DIE by Meggs

    The Demons’ impressive late season charge to finals will most likely come unstuck this Saturday evening when the Bombers blow up the also-ran Blues in the Ikon Park double-header.   To mangle McCartney, what does it matter to ya? To have any chance to play next week Narrm has got a job to do and needs to do it well.  We’ve got to give the Pie sheilas hell, say live and let die! It’s Indigenous Round for this game and the chance to celebrate and engage with Aboriginal and Torres

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    2024 Player Reviews: #32 Tom Sparrow

    Had to shoulder more responsibility as the club’s injury concerns deepened but needs to step up more as he closes in on 100 games. Date of Birth: 31 May 2000 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 21 Career Total: 95 Goals MFC 2024: 6 Career Total: 34 Games CDFC: 1 Goals CDFL: 0

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 18

    2024 Player Reviews: #35 Harry Petty

    Failed to fulfill the promise of his breakout six goal effort against the Tigers in 2023 and was generally disappointing as a key forward. It remains to be seen whether Simon Goodwin will persevere with him in attack or return him to the backline where he was an important cog in the club’s 2021 premiership success. Date of Birth: 12 November 1999 Height: 197cm Games MFC 2024: 20 Career Total: 82 Goals MFC 2024: 9 Career Total: 28 Brownlow Medal Votes 3

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 14

    2024 Player Reviews: #22 Blake Howes

    After a bright start to the season, playing mostly in defence, Howes seemed to lose his way in midseason but fought back with some good performances at Casey and finished the year back at AFL level. One to watch in 2024. Date of Birth: 7 March 2003 Height: 191cm Games MFC 2024: 15 Career Total:  15 Goals MFC 2024: 0 Career Total:  0 Games CDFC 2024: 6 Goals CDFC 2024: 0

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #33 Tom Fullarton

    Originally an NBL basketballer with the Brisbane Bullets, he moved across town in 2019 to the AFL Lions where he played 19 games before crossing to Melbourne where he was expected to fill a role as a back up ruckman/key forward. Unfortunately, didn’t quite get there although he did finish equal sixth in Casey’s best and fairest award. Date of Birth: 23 February 1999 Height: 198cm Games CDFC: 14 Goals CDFL: 13

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #10 Angus Brayshaw

    Sadly, had to wrap up a great career in midstream on the back of multiple concussions which culminated in the Maynard hit in the 2023 Qualifying Final. His loss to the club was inestimable over and above his on field talent given his character and leadership qualities, all of which have been sorely missed. Date of Birth: 9 January 1996 Height: 188cm Games MFC 2024: 0 Career Total: 167 Goals MFC 2024: 0 Career Total: 49

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #40 Taj Woewodin

    The son of former Demon Brownlow Medalist Shane, Taj added a further 16 games to his overall tally of games but a number were as substitute. He is slowly fitting into the team structure but without doing anything spectacular and needs to take further steps forward in 2025 for his career to progress. Date of Birth: 26 March 2003 Height: 182cm Games MFC 2024: 16 Career Total: 20 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 3 Games CDFC 2024: 6 Goals CDFC 2024: 1

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #16 Bailey Laurie

    The clever small was unable to cement a place in the Melbourne midfield and spent most of his time this year with the Casey Demons where he finished equal fourth in its best & fairest. Date of Birth: 24 March 2002 Height: 179cm Games MFC 2024: 6 Career Total: 11 Goals MFC 2024: 2 Career Total: 2 Games CDFC 2024: 12 Goals CDFC 2024: 7

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 23

    2024 Player Reviews: #17 Jake Bowey

    Bowey’s season was curtailed early when he sustained a shoulder injury that required surgery in the opening game against Sydney. As a consequence, he was never able to perform consistently or at anywhere near his previous levels.  Date of Birth: 12 September 2002 Height: 175cm Games MFC 2024: 14 Career Total: 61 Goals MFC 2024: 0 Career Total: 6

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 7
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...