Jump to content

Featured Replies

10 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Yeh but how about if you round it up to the nearest 0? Then it's 50. 

You're a w4nkr Ethan! As a Westralian you should know better.

But using a similar methodology he was closer to zero goals than a 100 in every season he played.

Edited by ManDee
w4nkr in a good way - Cheers

 
20 hours ago, ManDee said:

You're a w4nkr Ethan! As a Westralian you should know better.

But using a similar methodology he was closer to zero goals than a 100 in every season he played.

Which is why we got rid of him. Absolutely hopeless ?

 

1 hour ago, Lord Nev said:

Won't be at Freo next year.

Sydney a potential destination for him.

 

Yeh it’s been doing the rounds on Bigfooty for a little while. Watch this space. It’s a risky trade. 
 

A3-DF2814-C0-F2-4340-9180-E69227-E51-A69

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

28 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Yeh it’s been doing the rounds on Bigfooty for a little while. Watch this space. It’s a risky trade. 
 

A3-DF2814-C0-F2-4340-9180-E69227-E51-A69

Hogan doesn’t have any value in picks given his contract. 

27 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Yeh it’s been doing the rounds on Bigfooty for a little while. Watch this space. It’s a risky trade. 
 

A3-DF2814-C0-F2-4340-9180-E69227-E51-A69

Very risky, imagine Jesse and Buddy both driving to training... Potential carnage

 
1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Yeh it’s been doing the rounds on Bigfooty for a little while. Watch this space. It’s a risky trade. 
 

Wouldn't know mate, don't bother reading that trash site. Enjoy.

On 10/14/2020 at 3:07 PM, ManDee said:

Never happened.Hogan never kicked 50.

Why do people keep harping on about this? The most he ever kicked was 47 from 20 games. Career 90 games 170 goals @1.88  

Ben Brown by comparison 130 games 230 goals @ 2.2

 

Brown and Hogan into our current list. I wouldn't be complaining how do we get it done. 


Hogan and Blakey officially  on the trade table. I’d take Blakely of the two. We would have to be idiots to take Hogan back.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/fremantle-put-hogan-and-blakely-on-the-trade-table-20201020-p566tq.html

Edited by america de cali

12 minutes ago, america de cali said:

Hogan and Blakey officially  on the trade table. I’d take Blakely of the two. We would have to be idiots to take Hogan back.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/fremantle-put-hogan-and-blakely-on-the-trade-table-20201020-p566tq.html

we won't go near blakely given his relationship with langdon

would LOVE hogan but the story seems to be he's headed for the swans?

30 minutes ago, america de cali said:

Hogan and Blakey officially  on the trade table. I’d take Blakely of the two. We would have to be idiots to take Hogan back.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/fremantle-put-hogan-and-blakely-on-the-trade-table-20201020-p566tq.html

 

A month ago I was liking the idea of getting Hogan back.    But how much money , energy and resources did we burn on Harley Bennell?   Hogan will be the same and it will end the same.

Edited by Pickett2Jackson


On 10/14/2020 at 4:54 AM, PaulRB said:

Ahhh the joys of living in a social media “enhanced” world where players live inside a Fish bowl with the public scrutinising their every move...

Do you think Wayne Carey, Garry Abblet Snr and Swartz had no demons To deal with, and never indulged in their preferred coping mechanism.. or two? 
But they did ok on the field, you could even argue it helped them...

Jesse kicked 50+ with reduced games in the last season we made finals... has issues, yes.

Would have him back in a heartbeat.

No scrutiny of Gaz senior back in the day. Just smiles and laughs.

 

 

6 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

and jokes in 2020 given that it ain't him :P

Is that true?

That's even funnier.

8 minutes ago, McQueen said:

No scrutiny of Gaz senior back in the day. Just smiles and laughs.

 

 

Jeepers how’s the sniff the end and Couch just laughs

 

what a throwback to when commentators were great!

I'd be very happy to take him on a reasonably cheap contract. We know he can fit within our forwardline, and in theory we should be more capable of addressing any issues with him compared to other clubs. Just depends if there's any bad blood between Hogan and the club.


9 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Is that true?

That's even funnier.

100% not Ablett.

19 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

 

A month ago I was liking the idea of getting Hogan back.    But how much money , energy and resources did we burn on Harley Bennell?   Hogan will be the same and it will end the same.

Big difference between Hogan and Bennell.

If Hogan is fit and the price is right then absolutely i'd have him back. My preference is Brown though.

28 minutes ago, McQueen said:

No scrutiny of Gaz senior back in the day. Just smiles and laughs.

 

 

This vid has stitched a few ppl up in recent times.

That's a comedia/impersonator not the real G Abblett

Edited by Unleash Hell

 
On 10/17/2020 at 8:30 PM, 4_Kent_Watts said:

Brown and Hogan into our current list. I wouldn't be complaining how do we get it done. 

Sorry Man Dee your maths is out 
130 games 230 goals 2.2 

Check you figures and your maths !!!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 115 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies