Jump to content

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, BAMF said:

Of course. How is that related to Gaff in any way though?

Well, if we don't get Gaff, we'll have a spare place on our list. Makes sense to me. 

 

Yes on a one year contract at average wage circa $350k 

We don’t need him as I think his best is in the past. But again he’s got the skill and experience to be valuable. 

If I was Simon Goodwin, I would still pickup the phone if his manager rang. 

 

FWIW he grew up a Demons supporter. My kids and I used to go to Demons' matches at the G with him, his younger brother and mother regularly in the late 90s/early 2000s.

How's that for quality name dropping?

But it's a no from me.

Edited by Winners at last

1 hour ago, BAMF said:

Of course. How is that related to Gaff in any way though?

instead of

he's not happy at norf and has put off contract discussions


Pretty sure we tried to get him over at the end of 2018 but he declined. 

No thanks.

42 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Pretty sure we tried to get him over at the end of 2018 but he declined. 

No thanks.

I may have this wrong but it was rumoured that he was considering coming across however it fell through largely because he wanted to be an inside mid rather than a winger.

  • Author

Who gives a [censored] about him now. 
 

I was more intrigued by where my mind was at when I posted this very topic 4 plus years ago - cheers for the bump anyways’

Just goes to prove so many of us are ‘trigger happy’ or just have NFI about this competition and how long it takes to build a Premiership team. 
 

We are certainly in good hands imo.

 

A dual All Australian who inexplicably is playing poorly in a poor side at the moment .Can run all day and is an elite accumulator. Don't believe we have any prospect in getting him but would be a bonus replacement for Hibberd and Melksham .


1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

instead of

he's not happy at norf and has put off contract discussions

Ok. I'll take one of the King brothers.

1 minute ago, BAMF said:

Ok. I'll take one of the King brothers.

are they unhappy at their clubs or delaying contract upgrades?

if so, yes, i'd be very interested

  • Author
19 minutes ago, kallangurdemon said:

A dual All Australian who inexplicably is playing poorly in a poor side at the moment .Can run all day and is an elite accumulator. Don't believe we have any prospect in getting him but would be a bonus replacement for Hibberd and Melksham .

He’s gassed. At least 3 years too late. 
He would have no chance at a starting 22 position with our current team.

Edited by McQueen

32 minutes ago, kallangurdemon said:

A dual All Australian who inexplicably is playing poorly in a poor side at the moment .Can run all day and is an elite accumulator. Don't believe we have any prospect in getting him but would be a bonus replacement for Hibberd and Melksham .

He'd be at Casey.

WCE testing the waters with bait for Jacko,🤪, won’t even get a nibble lol


10 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Pretty sure we tried to get him over at the end of 2018 but he declined. 

No thanks.

yes and he knocked us back

Go get Gaff????

Go Get F#%^*@d !!!!!😠

41 minutes ago, Kent said:

yes and he knocked us back

Yep, Gaff can go stick his head up a dead bears posterior......(again)

35 minutes ago, Jontee said:

Yep, Gaff can go stick his head up a dead bears posterior......(again)

Ah Bazza McKenzie just keeps giving

13 minutes ago, Demon_spurs said:

Ah Bazza McKenzie just keeps giving

Should I tell Gaff to 'Go do his left eye in hot cockie droppings'?


[censored] off. Had his chance to come across and be part of something special but guilted himself into sticking with WCE after getting himself suspended belting Andrew Brayshaw and sitting out their 2018 flag success. He's past it now, imagine how [censored] he'd be in 2023. He can rot in Perth.

 

WCE have to look to off load players as they have Salary cap issues.

Not a good place, well and truly past their best with some big contracts and no kids coming through.

Getting Tim Kelly was meant to keep them in contention.

It will be a very slow rebuild.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 17 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies