Jump to content

Compensation for the loss of Angus

sue
sue
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Gawndy the Great said:

i would guess that the management of this situation had a lot of involvement from club and AFL HQ. 

His medical team advised him to stop playing on the basis of the most recent scans. The AFL in no way sat idle in the background and not have their say. Had Gus elected to ignore the advice, i believe the AFL would have stepped in and revoked his playing license. 

I think there would have been a lot of compromises made on both sides but ultimately:

1. Gus would take full payment of contract (likely by club and AFL) and guaranteed coverage of all medical expenses and some other bells and whistles. 

2. Club would be exempt from TPP implications as a result of the immediate payout.

3. AFL would have asked for some legal assurances of no legal action from Gus now or in future as a result of the QF incident. 

But how would the AFL have Brayshaw's medical advice? Surely that's personal health information which wouldn't be shared with the AFL unless Brayshaw explicitly gave permission for it to be provided.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    1 hour ago, Gawndy the Great said:

    i would guess that the management of this situation had a lot of involvement from club and AFL HQ. 

    His medical team advised him to stop playing on the basis of the most recent scans. The AFL in no way sat idle in the background and not have their say. Had Gus elected to ignore the advice, i believe the AFL would have stepped in and revoked his playing license. 

    I think there would have been a lot of compromises made on both sides but ultimately:

    1. Gus would take full payment of contract (likely by club and AFL) and guaranteed coverage of all medical expenses and some other bells and whistles. 

    2. Club would be exempt from TPP implications as a result of the immediate payout.

    3. AFL would have asked for some legal assurances of no legal action from Gus now or in future as a result of the QF incident. 

    Gus is contractually owed his player contract payments.  He would be ill-advised to sign any 'no future legal action' taled by the AFL.  These two issues are unrelated and payout is not predicated on him signing anything I suspect.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Wouldn't this become like a workers compensation claim, he was injured whilst at work, all players in AFL would be insured.  

    No club should oppose to any money for a forced retirement should fall outside the cap.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    If everything I am reading on here and between the lines,it seems like mfc is being shafted again by the AFL.Their seemingly lack of concern for Guses situation is being talked about in dollar terms who pays etc hes a person for god sake .I hate the afl so much .Could rant on but now to tired

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Angry 1
    23 hours ago, Superunknown said:

    Sorry what? Why is it unworthy? He has form and was he not on the record about going out to do some damage?

    in any case, that’s hardly a slur, especially relative to some of the other disconnected-from-reality comments and behaviour from their fans. Speaking of deplorables…..

     

    *ducks for cover*

    Mate if he played for Melbourne we would be saying something altogether different such as his regret for the accident, how he's devastated at what he has caused and that he accepts his aggression has to tempered in the future.

    In reality he may be genuinely remorseful..you don't know and  neither do I  .

    Put a sock in it and go for the AFL and their two faced self serving  response to most everthing.

    Maynard should have got 3 weeks minimum ( however they work it out) and the rules clarified.

    I imagine MFC will get very little joy from the system and trust that Gus will be around the Club in some shape or form while he moves on with his new career. 

    Ongoing best medical oversight is the least the AFL should provide

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    1 hour ago, Gawndy the Great said:

    3. AFL would have asked for some legal assurances of no legal action from Gus now or in future as a result of the QF incident. 

    Generally speaking, waivers relating to injury aren't typically enforceable (acknowledging a voluntary assumption of risk, the nature of the activity, unforeseen circumstances and the standard of negligence). The AFL may have requested a waiver, but that wouldn't necessarily stop or prevent a claim for compensation being successful. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 hour ago, sue said:

    But that's all, as you say, your 'guess'.   i have heard in ABC radio them say he has been forced to retire by the AFL.  And a couple of posters here have said that too, but I cannot find any statement from the AFL saying that and Gus said it was his decision. Anyone....?

    https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/1493891/a-letter-from-gus-to-the-demon-faithful

    I think Gus's own summary points to the medical team he appointed providing a diagnosis that he wasn't fit to continue playing. It certainly doesn't read that the AFL "forced" him to retire; more that he's sadly accepted professional medical advice.

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1
    • Clap 1

    It’s a non issue.

    There would be standard injury retirement clauses in the contract.

    MFC provide private health insurance for its players, covering lost wages.

    There are also entitlements under the workers Compensation Act for injuries in the workplace.

    A similar injury happened to Belly, who was compensated.

     

    Edited by bluey

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1
     
    22 hours ago, durango said:

    If he had retired at the end of last season then I think the MFC would have retained Harmes.

    Or Jordan

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    22 hours ago, durango said:

    If he had retired at the end of last season then I think the MFC would have retained Harmes.

    Or gone harder to get pick 1 from WCE to get Reid, this kid will be a star

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    12 hours ago, RalphiusMaximus said:

    Can Maynard write?  

    Brayden "I went to make a footy act" Maynard, can barely talk

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    • Vomit 1
    52 minutes ago, IRW said:

    Mate if he played for Melbourne we would be saying something altogether different such as his regret for the accident, how he's devastated at what he has caused and that he accepts his aggression has to tempered in the future.

    In reality he may be genuinely remorseful..you don't know and  neither do I  .

    Put a sock in it and go for the AFL and their two faced self serving  response to most everthing.

    Maynard should have got 3 weeks minimum ( however they work it out) and the rules clarified.

    I imagine MFC will get very little joy from the system and trust that Gus will be around the Club in some shape or form while he moves on with his new career. 

    Ongoing best medical oversight is the least the AFL should provide

    If he played for Melbourne I would be disgusted with him, don't judge everyone on here by your own standards.

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    3 hours ago, sue said:

    Is that true?  All I've seen is Angus saying it was his decision.

    He was medically retired by the AFL as I understand it.

    I stand to be corrected if that is wrong, but I think Gus was saying he didn’t want to retire.

    Ralph just wrote that the league medically retired Brayshaw and that will impact on who pays his contract.

    Edited by Redleg

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    23 hours ago, Dee Viney Intervention said:

    Now unfortunately a few weeks away from round zero (ohh FFS) we essentially have two unused spots on our list

    And 600 injured

  • Quote
    • Sad 1
    8 hours ago, BigBadBustling said:

    Our compensation should be that we can sign Uncle Byron. Plays round 13 plus a 10 week suspension gets him through to round 24.

    If you know what I mean.....

    I see what you're saying but I reckon we give Rod Grinter the job

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Clap 1
    • Demonland changed the title to Compensation for the loss of Angus

    1 hour ago, IRW said:

    Mate if he played for Melbourne we would be saying something altogether different such as his regret for the accident, how he's devastated at what he has caused and that he accepts his aggression has to tempered in the future.

    In reality he may be genuinely remorseful..you don't know and  neither do I  .

    Put a sock in it and go for the AFL and their two faced self serving  response to most everthing.

    Maynard should have got 3 weeks minimum ( however they work it out) and the rules clarified.

    I imagine MFC will get very little joy from the system and trust that Gus will be around the Club in some shape or form while he moves on with his new career. 

    Ongoing best medical oversight is the least the AFL should provide

    Maynard would be close to a criminal assault charge in my view

    The AFLAre a gutless corrupt organisation

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    • Clap 1
    8 hours ago, sue said:

    I wasn't referring to him (I have never forgiven his pro-Essendon position in the 'enhancement' program). But his co-presenter said it 3 times, so I guess she got it from him.

    I agree re the Essendon thing, he still throws it into his segment, given half the chance 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    8 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    But how would the AFL have Brayshaw's medical advice? Surely that's personal health information which wouldn't be shared with the AFL unless Brayshaw explicitly gave permission for it to be provided.

    I have no idea how this would work, but as employee of the AFL, i would presume some sort of work safe / insurance claim would be lodged. 

    I would also think his lengthy contract would have had a few clauses in their around medically forced retirement. Presumably it’s a standard clause in all contracts.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    9 hours ago, Ugottobekidding said:

    Wonder if Taj will fill his role

    Agree.

    Incidentally, I don't recall seeing him in the Richmond scratch match in either game.  Is he injured at the moment or did I just miss him.

    Reckon he's got star quality and character written all over him - both things that Gus played with from day dot. 

    Edited by Rodney (Balls) Grinter

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Love 1
    14 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

    Agree.

    Incidentally, I don't recall seeing him in the Richmond scratch match in either game.  Is he injured at the moment or did I just miss him.

    Reckon he's got star quality and character written all over him - both things that Gus played with from day dot. 

    Taj was out with concussion.

  • Quote
    • Shocked 1
    • Sad 2
     

    It’s been a bit of a blur, but I believe I heard it was an independent medical team made this decision, not the AFL.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Fremantle

      A month is a long time in AFL football. The proof of this is in the current state of the two teams contesting against each other early this Saturday afternoon at the MCG. It’s hard to fathom that when Melbourne and Fremantle kicked off the 2025 season, the former looked like being a major player in this year’s competition after it came close to beating one of the favourites in the GWS Giants while the latter was smashed by Geelong to the tune of 78 points and looked like rubbish. Fast forward to today and the Demons are low on confidence and appear panic stricken as their winless streak heads towards an even half dozen and pressure mounts on the coach and team leadership.  Meanwhile, the Dockers have recovered their composure and now sit in the top eight. They are definitely on the up and up and look most likely winners this weekend against a team which they have recently dominated and which struggles to find enough passages to the goals to trouble the scorers. And with that, Fremantle will head to the MCG, feeling very good about itself after demolishing Richmond in the Barossa Valley with Josh Treacy coming off a six goal haul and facing up to a Melbourne defence already without Jake Lever and a shaky Steven May needing to pass a fitness test just to make it onto the field of play. 

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 06

      The Easter Round kicks off in style with a Thursday night showdown between Brisbane and Collingwood, as both sides look to solidify their spots inside the Top 4 early in the season. Good Friday brings a double-header, with Carlton out to claim consecutive wins when they face the struggling Kangaroos, while later that night the Eagles host the Bombers in Perth, still chasing their first victory of the year. Saturday features another marquee clash as the resurgent Crows look to rebound from back-to-back losses against a formidable GWS outfit. That evening, all eyes will be on Marvel Stadium where Damien Hardwick returns to face his old side—the Tigers—coaching the Suns at a ground he's never hidden his disdain for. Sunday offers two crucial contests where the prize is keeping touch with the Top 8. First, Sydney and Port Adelaide go head-to-head, followed by a fierce battle between the Bulldogs and the Saints. Then, Easter Monday delivers the traditional clash between two bitter rivals, both desperate for a win to stay in touch with the top end of the ladder. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • 113 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Essendon

      What were they thinking? I mean by “they” the coaching panel and team selectors who chose the team to play against an opponent who, like Melbourne, had made a poor start to the season and who they appeared perfectly capable of beating in what was possibly the last chance to turn the season around.It’s no secret that the Demons’ forward line is totally dysfunctional, having opened the season barely able to average sixty points per game which means there has been no semblance of any system from the team going forward into attack. Nevertheless, on Saturday night at the Adelaide Oval in one of the Gather Round showcase games, Melbourne, with Max Gawn dominating the hit outs against a depleted Essendon ruck resulting from Nick Bryan’s early exit, finished just ahead in clearances won and found itself inside the 50 metre arc 51 times to 43. The end result was a final score that had the Bombers winning 15.6 (96) to 8.9 (57). On balance, one could expect this to result in a two or three goal win, but in this case, it translated into a six and a half goal defeat because they only managed to convert eight times or 11.68% of their entries. The Bombers more than doubled that. On Thursday night at the same ground, the losing team Adelaide managed to score 100 points from almost the same number of times inside 50.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Essendon

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • 63 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Fremantle

      The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • 442 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Essendon

      Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • 24 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All