Jump to content

Featured Replies

Kick straight and we win comfortably by 5 or so goals.

We always threatened to lose games last year with poor goalkicking. That was my one concern heading into last year's finals series. The Bulldogs round 20 game in particular, but you could argue this year poor goalkicking has cost us against Sydney, Bulldogs and now Collingwood. The most glaringly obvious was tonight's game though. 

Collingwood played out of their skins. Their pressure was elite and we let them transition too easily at times.

But we shouldn't be losing that game. It's fixable if it doesn't become mental.

Really poor result though obviously and now we could well miss the top 4.

 
10 minutes ago, wizardinoz said:

No should have played JVR tonight & dropped the momentum killer in ANB.

No, didn't mean play him tonight but if he gets a couple of weeks in the forward system could be some X factor for finals

3 minutes ago, bluey said:

Gone is to far up himself, missed three from twenty metres out, non quirky captain required! Yep 

He's a great Captain. He's got to work harder on his shots at goal - particularly the high drop and the swing foot. Jackson could have done more around the ground, particularly pick-ups, not taps into further troubles.

 
15 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

One trick pony got the job done.

We knew exactly what they’d try to do and we let them do it. We’re a defensive team who can’t win a shootout, yet we let the game unfold that way anyway.

This was a supremely disappointing effort from the coaching group. They’ve got work to do now as top two is likely gone. 

[censored] what a let down.

Yeah, well what are we Lingers!! Same old play going forward, same old kick into the pocket, predictable, no plan B.

Leaders went missing once again when the heat was turned up.

Only one who genuinely tried to will us back in the game was Oliver.

 


1 minute ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

How do you have 93 more possessions but lose a game of footy?

Pies are unfortunately the real deal and a few have been late to the party to acknowledge this.

I’d be surprised if they don’t play in this year’s GF.

It's all going to come crashing down for them. The only question is whether that happens before the flag is won this year, or after.

There's nothing sustainable about what they're doing, it's all crazy high confidence and emotion. The game was on our terms in the first half. Much of the reason we weren't further in front by half time was our own doing, not theirs. That opens the door for a confident team riding on a huge crowd and feeding off all that emotion to get a head of steam, all of which is credit to them, but if we had had a lead at half time which reflected our first half dominance (17 points did not reflect it), they would have had a much harder task ahead of them.

Fully expect them to regress significantly in 2023 as history tells us the odds of them getting this sort of run of luck is 0% (look at Port, great record in close games last year, can't buy a win in them this year). But it won't matter if they ride this out for six more weeks and get the flag in the process.

Conversion rate poor. Forward structure just lacks danger and devil.

Too many players without enough tricks and class  to be considered top end.

 

Thoroughly Sickened

best team won. They took the game on. Played with dash and dare

we were down with 2 mins left. From the kickout kicked to the wing and went nowhere. Pies would have attacked straight through the middle. 

And they’re fitter. Ran out the game much better 

We’re not as good as I thought we were

no flag playing like that this year 

Edited by BDA

 

We were the better side on the night.  I think the difference is quite simple. They kick goals out of their [censored] and we can't kick straight to save ourselves.

Is anyone going to call out gawn and his attracious kicking? I know we all love max but he is our captain and he is letting us down in front of goal.

I know what he did last year but he is costing us in front of goal and at the wrong times. 

It's getting frustrating


3 minutes ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Bit harsh on Salem, Gawn missed an easier one, not to mention 3 goals given away by over hand balling inside our forward 50.

Coaches need to sit Kozzie down and show him 

2 x toe pokes inside forward 50 when you just need to put your head over the footy

1 x token arm thrown in at a ground ball contest inside forward 50 missing everything and allowing an easy clearance as opposed to licking it in

Goes for a mark inside 50 in the fourth but puts only one hand up and doesn’t bring ball to ground, Quaynor mops up out the back

Again contested ball on the southern wing late in the game just a hand put in, no ball or body, Pies go inside 50 and take the lead back. That was not long after the 1 arm marking contest

Those are instances which cost you in a game - simple rule ball or body. 
 

Last year he’s hungry and takes ball or body, needs to do better

Also with Kozzie he needs to be told he is a small forward with some pace and X factor and to NOT sit at back of packs looking for the easy one. He and Spargo need to be at bottom front of packs. Did not see them at all front and centre.

Game plan: kick it long to a contest in the left pocket even when we are being repeatedly outmarked.  Wow. What could possibly go wrong. 
Seriously we will be very lucky to finish top 4 and the dreaM of back  to back looks just that, a dream. 
Desperately need to find a strong marking tall forward and the whole forward line needs to learn to convert their chances.  Had we done so we would have had a barely deserved win tonight. 

And our problems start in the forward 50. We don’t lock the ball in anymore 


Kozzie goes missing in big games

Just now, Docs Demons said:

Also with Kozzie he needs to be told he is a small forward with some pace and X factor and to NOT sit at back of packs looking for the easy one. He and Spargo need to be at bottom front of packs. Did not see them at all front and centre.

Yep towards the end kozzie was waiting for the easy handball out the back then putting pressure on.

1 minute ago, Mr Steve said:

Last point, as much as it hurt would have hurt a lot more if it been a final. They won't get us next time.

Why not? They have it over us. 

I am struggling to think because the fog of rage will not disperse.

Our game plan has been figured out. When beaten this year it is in the same style - fast with accurate kicking. 

I'm not sure what we can do about our forward play. BBB is taking some marks (and dropping lots) and presenting well but we have no aerial authority at all. 

Our midfield got trounced in the 2nd half. How is that possible with our personnel?

How many marks did they take inside 50.

We only lost by a goal, feels like a 5 goal loss.

and that habit of receiving the ball, stopping, turning around to fend of the tackler (the Pies tackled in pairs tonight) then handballing blind is so rage-inducing. Hate it. Hate it. Hate it.


1 minute ago, dees189227 said:

Is anyone going to call out gawn and his attracious kicking? I know we all love max but he is our captain and he is letting us down in front of goal.

I know what he did last year but he is costing us in front of goal and at the wrong times. 

It's getting frustrating

I think it was the one when he marked on 50, his fav spot. Time for a Captains goal and he went the short pass into the pocket.

11 minutes ago, Mr Steve said:

No one seems to stay down when the ball goes forward.  That said play the game again and you will get a different result.

Agreed, the ball went over the back of the pack to 2 or 3 collingwood players, all of our players were either going for the mark or sitting in front watching the pies run away with it. We need to do something about how clubs switch on us. All night long they switched down the same wing and we failed to cover giving them easy access to their forward 50. we need to work on how we lock down so that we dont allow that easy switch.

12 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Enough with your obsession about blaming umps, so tiresome Clint. 

He is not completely wrong.

The umpires kept them in the game in the first half, granted our goal kicking deficiency too.

There was also a goal that came from Ginivan dropping the ball, what the F**K is that?!

 
11 minutes ago, gOLLy said:

Possibly out coached?

You betcha.

Was a repeat of the Dogs game, we played well but defensively [censored] house.

To much hand-balling across the HF line, when we should be getting it to Brown advantage and let our smalls go to work.

ANB has been ave of recent times and I've been an advocate of his at times, but he took the tackle on way to many times today and in moments when we were surging fwd and he just needed to keep the ball moving fwd.  He wasn't alone but he stood out the most.

we just didn't have the match ups for their fwd line.  De goey was given way to much space at stoppages fwd of center, where they look to tap it to him every time when they are in scoring areas

Like the dogs loss, its one with a lot of positives in it. and maybe it is just a change in our game plan for Collingwood not necessarily a change all together.  a lot of other teams we would have blown them away enough to cruise after 3/4 time 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies