Jump to content

Featured Replies

To name him as a token suggestion onfield or otherwise is the insult imho. If he is not busting down the door for selection, then the finals are just too important in my view to even give him his farewell game. How do you think this would be taken by the rest of the team - i think other players will have mixed feelings about what is more important. Is it putting our best team forward at winning the GF or sending off an individual who was with us in the one of the darkest era's of our history. Team over individual every single time.

I'm not against signing him up for another year to give him a proper farewell game in front of the faithful next year. If he has coaching aspirations, then include that as part of the one year deal. I suspect that this is what will happen otherwise he would have been named in the Adelaide game.

 

Another thing to consider is that Jones is due to have twins soon. Any game now will require prolonged quarantining and time away from the family. He may not want to do that without a guarantee that he will be in the team, which is obviously not something they can promise him.

No tbh I think the fairy tale was getting him to 300 games.

Luv the bloke though

 

Ahhh, the romantic vs the ruthless.

it will be so sad from his point of view, if after all those years where he was the only reason to go to games, and while he is still on the senior list he just misses out by a whisker.

maybe he gets a medi sub but that would only happen if all the alternatives have bad games, or get injured, and i don't want to wish that on them. 

 

Edited by daisycutter


"Lever said Jones “might be hurting deep down” but had retained his typical professional manner. He said Jones had been best on ground in two of the past three VFL practice matches and was fighting for a recall".

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/new-season-starts-now-demons-dare-to-dream-in-premiership-hunt-20210823-p58l07.html

Draw your own conclusions.

 

The kids have gone past him.
It's about the future now.

1 hour ago, Engorged Onion said:

Ahhh, the romantic vs the ruthless.

Bit of both I would have thought😎

 

Goody has again been mentioning Nate as pushing for selection.

It's time for Goody to shif or get off the pot.

Recall him, or stop bringing up his name. If he's not getting in, then stop jerking us around.

Edited by Colin B. Flaubert

1 minute ago, Colin B. Flaubert said:

Goody has again been mentioning Nate as pushing for selection.

It's time for Goody to shif or get off the pot.

Recall him, or stop bringing up his name. If he's not getting in, then stop jerking us around.

Yeah feel like it would head [censored] Jonesy big time.

I think it's highly unlikely we'll see Jones during the finals series unfortunately. 


2 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Yeah feel like it would head [censored] Jonesy big time.

I think it's highly unlikely we'll see Jones during the finals series unfortunately. 

Jones is depth, he’s be acutely aware of this, but you never know what can happen in the space of a few weeks. He’ll be making sure he’s ready to go in case he is needed. 

6 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Yeah feel like it would head [censored] Jonesy big time.

I think it's highly unlikely we'll see Jones during the finals series unfortunately. 

I agree. Goody might think he is being kind, and while he isn't saying it to be malicious, it mustn't be good for his headspace.

I assume that 'the discussion' would have been had at the end of last year, and potentially leading into this week, that Nate is getting to the end and he can't expect to be first 22 automatically.

He had it with Bernie. He had it with Jordie.

However, he didn't keep teasing them as part of the most likely shot at a premiership in my lifetime. Plus, both of those blokes had played plenty of September footy at their former clubs, especially the former. 

Edited by Colin B. Flaubert

Some are assuming that what Goodwin says in public is the same as what he says to Jones in private and that Jones is not aware of the reason for the difference.

We haven't won a flag in 50+ years, don't think we can afford to be too romantic/sentimental 

Unfortunately think the only way we see Jones is if we lose a couple of mids to injury/suspension.

Don't think JJ or Sparrow have done anything to warrant being out of the match squad.

If it's between Jones and AVB it's a slightly different debate. 

Jones may be doing well in the strange intra/inter club scratch matches (or whatever they are) but can we judge form on that?

But then again,  we don't get the full picture of how everyone is training. 

 

7 minutes ago, sue said:

Some are assuming that what Goodwin says in public is the same as what he says to Jones in private and that Jones is not aware of the reason for the difference.

Even with that being the case, I'm not sure why a bloke who is renowned for playing his cards so close to his chest in press conferences chooses to be indicative on a topic this sensitive.

And if he has told Nate behind the scenes that he is a long shot at best or finished at worst, why do this? To play mind games with the opposition?

Edited by Colin B. Flaubert


This is a really tough one.

He has been a great  gutsy  player, captain and loyal servant of the Mfc .

Is he good enough to play ie best 22 and if so is there a specific player for him to nullify?

The idea of medical sub sounds good but it carries a risk element if we lose someone early.

There is so much at stake that if hes not best 22 then the smart thing would be to leave him out.

I would say that given the depth of our list and lack of injuries he's not playing again.

Its tough but flag chances have been bloody tough to say the least.

Sadly NJ would be the first to accept his omission for the sake of a flag.

Edited by leave it to deever

20 minutes ago, sue said:

Some are assuming that what Goodwin says in public is the same as what he says to Jones in private and that Jones is not aware of the reason for the difference.

Totally agree.

The players love Goodwin. Can’t we assume that he actually does speak to them, and speaks to them honestly?

I’ve got no doubt that Nathan Jones is entirely aware Of his situation, and I suspect Goody is being quite honest in his press conferences – I would think Nathan Jones is about 24th or 25th in our best 22, so that means that if we get a couple of injuries, he will be called upon and if we don’t, he won’t.

I would also guess Goodwin had a frank discussion with Jonesy either before or just after the 300th, and that Jonesey was well aware of his position. I am sure that he could have chosen to bow out gracefully then and if he chose not to do that, it would have been with the knowledge that he was by no means certain to be selected again.

On 8/12/2021 at 8:04 PM, Dr. Gonzo said:

Neville Jetta too, feel sorry for those two guys.

I'm with you @Dr. Gonzo I feel for both of these guys.

During the dark days, Jones going in and under and getting smashed 

Jetta matching up on taller players and having the ball come in at warp speed a few hundred times a game.

Hope we include them both in ceremony somehow but unfortunately I don't think there's a spot for them in the finals.

The club did the club culture thing in getting Nate to 300. Well done, club.

Now the club has to do the club culture thing by landing a flag. Thank you for your efforts, Nathan.

Jones was gifted matches early this year.  We were able to able to run down a pensioner side in the cats last week , so why do we a pensioner to be added to our side ?  Water boy at best.


Agree with other posters. The club 'did the right thing' by getting him to 300 games where his form probably didn't justify it.

Great clubman. I can see Goody giving him his premiership medallion (thinking positive!) like Beveridge/Murphy.

It may only happen if there are injuries. And we don't want that.

 

Grand Final day. Jonesy as medi-sub. Dees up by 6 goals.  Five minutes left.  
Harmesy gets a bad knock on the kneecap and sent to the bench but can’t run. 
Jonesy bursts from the bench and into the ground.  The crowd erupts.  Demonland faithful shed buckets of tears throughout the nation.  

If his form warrants it in these pseudo-practice games of course Nathan Jones can push out a Sparrow. Selection should remain what it has been - rewarding those that play their role and showing (for the most part) selection integrity when players drop in form.

You don't run a line through someone heading into the finals.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 527 replies