Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Tried to watch as much of Sam replays over the last 5 years as I could.

I still cant work out what his problem is>

It appears that in a pack he doesn't compete strongly enough or his body position is quite right

Also he is very close to marking more but continues to drop them

Any body have a thought?

 

A good comparison would be when he has been a marking machine - Geelong 2018, the early games in 2020. What the difference is I have no idea - keen for anyone's thoughts

Easy.. he's too far forward in the marking competition that doesn't allow him to protect the space or to get the crucial second grab

How to fix it... no idea

 

Quite simply he's a confidence player, if he gets his hands to one, more typically follow.

The one he dropped from Spargo was a killer.

My thought is that he's great against lower opposition in the VFL.  Great against people that are undersized or not as strong as him.   But in the big dance he's up against the best of the best every step of the way.   And he can't out-body people most of the time and can't lead with clear space.    He's an inbetweener.   Not AFL standard for the most part, but way too good for VFL level.

It's just a reality he's not going to be as good as what some people will lead you to believe 


He held plenty last year. 

I'd say it's mostly confidence. He's still rarely had a consistent run of AFL footy.

Otherwise it's a bit of athleticism - he can't jump up over the pack to get clear air, he doesn't have that quick second reaction to take it on the second bite like Jackson does, and he hasn't been strong enough to hold his position until the last couple of seasons.

There's not many key forwards who rely on contested marking these days. You got to get your easy kicks on the lead. The pack situations are more about not being out marked. If you can get 1-2 a week that's doing well.

I think it's a perception thing based on the fact that the majority of his marking 'opportunities' are contested marks or pack situations. He could definitely improve, but I believe he gets marked very harshly in this area due to that.

This year so far he's ranked 4th for us for average contested marks per game. Only Gawn, Lever and TMac are ahead of him.

Would be difficult being a young key forward, trying to build your confidence, in and out of the team, bad luck with poorly timed injuries, who then comes up against pack mark situations most of the time at AFL level.

Weid can definitely improve, but I'm pretty staggered by the amount of criticism of him so far this year.

Edited by Lord Nev

 

As frustrating as it is, I look at it like this... he is getting to the contest and making a good fist of it.  That is half the battle.  The hands will come with more consistent game time and some confidence.  

He could have kicked 5-6 goals the other night with the contests and positions he was putting himself in, but unfortunately he is just not holding them. 5-6 goals is a solid day out against a solid opponent.  It will come eventually.

Not sure, confidence maybe?  Hopefully?  But I hope he starts clunking them.  If he had have marked every ball he got his hands to on Friday we'd be talking about what a great game he had.  I'm still holding out hope he has a huge game soon which gets his confidence up to start consistently impacting games.

  • Demonland changed the title to Why Can't Sam Complete his Marks?

I never want to question any AFL footballers courage -   but I think he gets too far under ball as he fears contact of the pack behind him -  needs to stay in best position to mark no matter what's around him -  and sometimes that's not about courage but just comes when you're full of confidence and playing on instict. 

Last year when he was the number one forward, and Jackson was two, his marking was border-line elite. As soon as Jackson was injured and Tmac came back in his marking fell away. I genuinely feel like he defers to the senior player and doesn't attack marking contests with as much authority when he doesn't feel like he's the main target.
 

So in short my theory is it is all confidence/self belief, combined with a bit of structural tinkering to separate our key forwards in marking contests. 

 

just listened to the podcast and the criticism of weid is so disproportionate. he has a presence and crashes packs which allows crumbing goals like the harmes and jordan goals that i don’t think brown can bring. a week ago brown had 4 touches in the vfl without a goal. give him a chance and let him get some continuity and we’ll be rewarded for it

It would be more concerning if he was getting outmarked by his opponent. I’m sure it’s confidence.

Tmac, Weid, Fritta, Dogga and Max need to spend more games together. Besides Max who only spends short stints in the forward line. There doesn’t seem to be a clear leader, unlike the backline, May and Lever. I just think they’ll need an extended run at it altogether. Hopefully we don’t get any injuries!

  • Author
18 minutes ago, mfcrox said:

As frustrating as it is, I look at it like this... he is getting to the contest and making a good fist of it.  That is half the battle.  The hands will come with more consistent game time and some confidence.  

He could have kicked 5-6 goals the other night with the contests and positions he was putting himself in, but unfortunately he is just not holding them. 5-6 goals is a solid day out against a solid opponent.  It will come eventually.

Yes that was my impression mfcrox. He is definitely getting to enough contests. Why does he try to mark in the pack? T Mac and Max are already doing that. Maybe he needs to rethink and give alternative options by leading as he did in 2018


He gets his hands on a lot of balls but does not complete the marks because he is too straight he should mark the ball at eye level with his arms outstretched and [censored] in a v shape stopping the defender from getting is arms near his arms or the ball.

He need to practice this at training so it become second nature when he gets near the ball along with timing his leads so that players make his job easier, on Friday in the 3rd quarter he was timing his leads and positioning himself much better and 2 goals resulted.

Also on Friday the talls were either competing against each other or not flying at all.

Edited by durango
spelling

Confidence more then anything.

Last he he held on to some pretty big marks and then dropped right off. Just needs a game where it just sticks and gets a feel for it.

I can't remember tomohawk or Jack rewoilt being incapable of holding a mark. They have come from and built premiership winning sides.

Petty can mark it and kick straight.

I'm sick of the idea Weid is still developing or lacks confidence. 

Nathan Jones is still developing but it gets to a point in your career when you need to bring something. Not fluke a few marks in a final when everyone else fell over like Bradbury won gold

 

Edited by Wrecker46

Weed was a reliable mark early in his Career both at AFL and VFL level .In the last 3 years his marking above his head has been generally poor at both levels .He gets away with it in the VFl  bccause of greater opportunityand the number of soft goals.If you watch him at training it is clear that he is a strong one grab mark and there is nothing wrong with his technique.So it probably just comes down to confidence in a similar way that Tmac needs a basket when his confidence is down but clunks them when it is up.

He has a few issues when going for marks. 

Sometimes, he has his hands too far above the head and the ball is not in his line of view. Other times, his wrists and elbows seem to stiff and they don't act like shock absorbers. He has difficulty finding separation, when he can create a mismatch, he does well, as he doesn't have to elevate too high. Leaping is not his preferred method.

Needs to be more aggressive against his opponents, body them away instead of leading with them on his tail. Frequently finds himself with two opponents or in a pack. Loved that he can bring the ball down though.

I want to see him come a bit more laterally at the contest and have his arms infront of his eyes, or a bit to the side, then have softer hands and some give in his elbows. 

Really needs to get his hands in the right position as he snaps the ball. High focus on the ball, don't take your of it, be relaxed and get in the zone.

A bit about technique but also, alot about confidence. A little anxiety exacerbates his, not quite right technique.

C'mon Weids, I still believe he can get there.


50 minutes ago, Knuckles said:

Last year when he was the number one forward, and Jackson was two, his marking was border-line elite. As soon as Jackson was injured and Tmac came back in his marking fell away. I genuinely feel like he defers to the senior player and doesn't attack marking contests with as much authority when he doesn't feel like he's the main target.
 

So in short my theory is it is all confidence/self belief, combined with a bit of structural tinkering to separate our key forwards in marking contests. 

 

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but his two marks and goals on the weekend came when McDonald was off the ground after a marking contest collision.

 

Sam has great judgement and gets his hands to the ball first regularly in packs. It's just that they don't stick.

Maybe better resin (sticky stuff on the hands), maybe squeezing a squash ball in each hand to develop strength in the hands, maybe screaming "it's mine" to switch on his brain and body; maybe short, sharp kicks into his hands at training to build muscle memory; maybe he should stick to leading rather than pack marks.

He has the ability it's just that it is stuck somewhere.  Find the release and he will be good.

TMac said it can take a while to get in to a groove with marking, especially if you're returning from being out of the side. I figure as someone who has had two seasons where he marks everything and two in between where he really struggled to mark anything, he's qualified to talk on the topic. 

And it makes sense to me - the ball moves so fast that your timing, either of arriving at the ball, or getting your hands to it, only needs to be out by a fraction and you've blown it. 

I remember when Gawn, pre-elite era, where things just started coming together for him, but it seemed he couldn't catch a cold. Obviously he's still not perfect, but you'd back him most of the time now.

Weid's shown he can mark before. I'm backing this part of his game to come good with patience and time in the side.

 
31 minutes ago, Wrecker46 said:

Petty can mark it and kick straight.

Not sure if you mean kicking for goal here, but his kicking is very poor. I'd put in the same 'confidence' category as Weid's marking. Catch his first two kicks on Friday? One out of bounds on the full, one straight to the opposition.

He and Jackson both need work. 
 

Jacko runs under the ball, Weid drops his head and eyes come off the ball. His is more concentration 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies