Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.
Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (â‹®) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Bayley Fritsch cleared of striking

McQueen
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, The Swimming Dee said:

Have to appeal

The guy elbowed the north player in the head... take the 1 week and consider yourself lucky 

 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    Just now, Jaded said:

    Would agree. We play Carlton the following week. Worth risking a 2 week penalty. 

    I didn’t think, appealing at the tribunal risks extra weeks any more does it?

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Gee imagine what he would have got if he had actually concussed him. 

    It was a dumb thing to do but he didn't intend to get him that high. Unfortunately the head being such a massive issue lately, things are graded harder. 

    Bugger. 

  • Quote
    •  
    4 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    The MRO Monday results have been released after 6pm.

    I still can't work out why most of you think he'll get off.

    He elbowed someone in the head, and that player went off hurt which automatically rules out low impact.

    At best:

    Careless, high contact, medium impact = 1 week.

    If the MFC deem that an injustice, then it's up to them to challenge at the tribunal.

    If you tick the boxes, you get this outcome.

    But the boxes weren't ticked this way for Dangerfield in the Grand Final. Why? Because "it was the view of the MRO that Dangerfield's actions were not unreasonable in the circumstances".

    Implicitly the same result was reached in the Hawkins and Hipwood incidents earlier this year (I can't find any MRO statement on either of those incidents).

    So why was Fritsch's incident deemed "unreasonable" when the other three weren't? Each of the other three resulted in worse injuries than Fritsch's, so that can't be it.

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Thanks 2
    • Love 1

    This is the opportunity the Weid has been waiting for. Let's see what he can do.

     

    Edited by Better days ahead

  • Quote

    Stuff the AFL, May gets smacked in the face and blood pouring out, and dwakings walks away free?

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Angry 1
     
    2 minutes ago, SPC said:

    Most agreed it was a week.. he gets a week and.... meltdown 

    elbowed a player to the head when fending off. It’s a suspension. 

    It's the double standards for me. I don't have a problem with the suspension, if it was consistent.

    Either we suspend on outcome or we don't. Hawkins didn't get suspended as it was 'accidental contact', but he broke May's eye socket. Fritsch was just as much in play, player had 0 injuries and played out the game, but Fritsch gets one.

    How the impact is medium is beyond me. Playing the game out is no impact! 

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    • Angry 1
    Just now, titan_uranus said:

    If you tick the boxes, you get this outcome.

    But the boxes weren't ticked this way for Dangerfield in the Grand Final. Why? Because "it was the view of the MRO that Dangerfield's actions were not unreasonable in the circumstances".

    Implicitly the same result was reached in the Hawkins and Hipwood incidents earlier this year (I can't find any MRO statement on either of those incidents).

    So why was Fritsch's incident deemed "unreasonable" when the other three weren't? Each of the other three resulted in worse injuries than Fritsch's, so that can't be it.

    Well said TU. I believe an appeal is well worth it in this case. He is such an important player for us

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    2 minutes ago, Satan said:

    Not shocked  , weed certainly in

    It would be great to see Sam finally his chance to play. 

  • Quote
    2 minutes ago, Jaded said:

    It's the double standards for me. I don't have a problem with the suspension, if it was consistent.

    Either we suspend on outcome or we don't. Hawkins didn't get suspended as it was 'accidental contact', but he broke May's eye socket. Fritsch was just as much in play, player had 0 injuries and played out the game, but Fritsch gets one.

    How the impact is medium is beyond me. Playing the game out is no impact! 

    Hawkins was looking the other way, Fritsch had eyes on the player, that’s the difference 

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    Having a look at this goal from Kozzy, it looks like Bayley gave a similar fend to Hall at 0:29.

    Seemed the fend was more accurate on this occasion.

     

  • Quote
    • Love 2

    1 minute ago, ucanchoose said:

    Cop the week, learn and move on

     

    [censored] that.       Fat porker Tom Hawkins smashed Mays face in and got off scot free.  He has a history and is a known thug.

    Fritch has a clean record and the North player wasn't even hurt,.

    Farcical.

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1

    Ridiculous. Appeal or otherwise we look weak. You can be sure they will want their compensated darling swans to win this week.

  • Quote
    • Like 4

    Cop the week?!?  Bugger off!!!

    Hawkins fractures May's eye socket and got off no case to answer.  Fritsch caused no injury at all to the kid and gets a week.  

     

    If this isn't overturned on dispute, I'll be astounded.

    Edited by mfcrox

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    6 minutes ago, SPC said:

    Most agreed it was a week.. he gets a week and.... meltdown 

    elbowed a player to the head when fending off. It’s a suspension. 

    Agree with what you said.....but Dangerfield as a precedent means Fritter shouldn't have been suspended.  I and most others I think could accept it deserved a week.  Just don't like the double standards ...

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    9 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

    Not good news ...

    6AF81782-A097-44E6-87FD-047F7E114A3B.jpeg

    Could maybe argue the medium impact angle...as Powell played on.

    ...but probably  just get on with it.

    It wasn't a good look.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Just now, SPC said:

    Hawkins was looking the other way, Fritsch had eyes on the player, that’s the difference 

    Yeah and Bailey was in play, with a player coming at him, and he has a broken hand.

    Hawkins was trying to lose May and swung an arm. He didn't need to swing his arm at all.

    Besides, my point still stands. Medium impact for no injury is ridiculous. The guy came off for 5 minutes. Hardly medium impact. 

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1

    Dangerfield's actions were deemed "not unreasonable". Here's a screenshot of the lead up:

    image.thumb.png.20f6bba75780f0016f9be565334ddcf3.png

    He sees Vlastuin coming, raises his elbow to punch the ball and/or to brace himself. Clip here for context.

    Here's Fritsch:

    image.png.8de1bde1d1b951295d0464f89dcbcb18.png

    Clip here for context.

    He and Powell are running towards each other. He braces to fend off Powell, who will otherwise cannon into him. Yes, he does so in a way that hits him high, but that didn't matter for Dangerfield.

    So why was what Fritsch did "unreasonable", and what was his alternative?

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Thanks 2
    5 minutes ago, Jaded said:

    It's the double standards for me. I don't have a problem with the suspension, if it was consistent.

    Either we suspend on outcome or we don't. Hawkins didn't get suspended as it was 'accidental contact', but he broke May's eye socket. Fritsch was just as much in play, player had 0 injuries and played out the game, but Fritsch gets one.

    How the impact is medium is beyond me. Playing the game out is no impact! 

    That’s not correct. You can be hurt and still play without concussion. He was assisted off and was wobbly. It hurt him and it was careless. A fine or 1 week were the obvious penalties. 
    If we can’t get more for appealing they probably will, but otherwise they will accept it and move on.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
     

    FRIGGEN APPEAL DEES typical double standards Afl 

    Edited by picket fence

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Was always going to get rubbed out for that. Stupid IMO. I reckon this will force the MCs hand and we'll play Weideman now.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • AFLW: 2025 Season Preview

      Ten seasons. Eighteen teams. With the young talent pathway finally fully connected, Women’s Australian Rules football is building momentum and Season 2025 promises to be the best yet. In advance of Season 10, the AFL leadership has engaged in candid discussions with all clubs regarding strategies to boost attendance and expand fan bases. Concerningly, average attendances in 2024 were 2,660 fans per match, with the women’s game incurring an annual loss of approximately $50 million.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Western Bulldogs

      The next coach of the Melbourne Football Club faces the challenge of teaching his players how to win games against all comers. At times during this tumultuous season, that task has seemed daunting, made more so in light of the surprise news last week of the sacking of premiership coach Simon Goodwin. However, there were also some positive signs from yesterday’s match against the Western Bulldogs that the challenge may not be as difficult as one might think. The two sides presented a genuine football spectacle, featuring pulsating competitive play with eight lead changes throughout the afternoon, in a display befitting a finals match.The result could have gone either way and in the end, it came down to which team could produce the most desperate of acts to provide a winning result. It was the Bulldogs who had their season on the line that won out by a six point margin that fitted the game and the effort of both sides.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Brisbane

      The rain had been falling heavily in south east Queensland when the match began at Springfield, west of Brisbane. The teams exchanged early goals and then the Casey Demons proceeded like a house on fire in the penultimate game of the VFL season against a strong opponent in the Brisbane Lions. Sparked by strong play around the ground by seasoned players in Charlie Spargo and Jack Billings, a strong effort from Bailey Laurie and promising work from youngsters in Kynan Brown and  Koltyn Tholstrup, the Demons with multiple goal kickers firing, raced to a 27 point lead late in the opening stanza. A highlight was a wonderful goal from Laurie who brilliantly sidestepped two opponents and kicked beautifully from 45 metres out.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Hawthorn

      The Demons return to the MCG this time as the visiting team where they get another opportunity to put a dent into a team's top 8 placing when they take on the Hawks on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Like
      • 100 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Western Bulldogs

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 11th August @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Western Bulldogs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • 48 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Western Bulldogs

      The Demons lacked some polish but showed a lot of heart and took it right up to the Bulldogs in an attempt to spoil their finals hopes ultimately going down by a goal at the MCG.

        • Like
      • 337 replies
      Demonland
    View All

    Configure browser push notifications
    Chrome (Android)
    1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
    2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
    3. Adjust your preference.
    Chrome (Desktop)
    1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
    2. Select Site settings.
    3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.