Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

With all due respect, not a chance. More off field issues and well past his best with age and body working against him.

  • Author

@Nascenthe played 9 games and averaged 16 disposals per games, definitely players on our list that wouldn't contribute as much as that in a game.

 

Was a brilliant player for the Saints. Not sure we need him if we want Sparrow and others to come on.

At only 30 perhaps too young for the Cats?

Edited by dee-tox

34 minutes ago, Marcus94 said:

@Nascenthe played 9 games and averaged 16 disposals per games, definitely players on our list that wouldn't contribute as much as that in a game.

And played most of the season overweight, broke down with soft tissue injuries and cats are trying to get rid of him after only one year. He's a shadow of the player he once was, wouldn't touch him. 


NO

Ha!  just saw the announcement and was waiting for this thread.

 

N-O spells No!

 

No way.  In it only for the money now and clearly the Cats have realised that.

  • Demonland changed the title to The Jack Steven Thread

ABSOLUTELY NO BLINKING WAY KNOWN.Too many known issues!

4 hours ago, Marcus94 said:

 

Just saw this on the AFL Website. Is Jack Steven worth a look if he were to leave the Old Folks home?

Link: https://www.afl.com.au/news/523602/early-exit-veteran-cats-mid-could-take-payout-for-2021

 

 

 

image.thumb.png.6ba909da77e3f319186f4772d4adb009.png

short answer: no

long answer:  nnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Edited by daisycutter

Hard pass. Would prefer to bring Dean Turlich out of retirement than bother with a broken Jack Steven.


Just suggesting we look at Steven should result in a lifetime ban. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

Alright, let's analyse this sensibly. He was quite good at St Kilda. Not so good at Geelong. He's got attitude and injury issues and he's 30 years old. In a good environment he could become a decent player. Sounds like a good fit for the deees. 

It's yes from me !!

When Hell freezes over maybe


6 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Should we take a stab at him?

Just to suggest it, proves you know nothing about football

Edited by don't make me angry

If we grab him reckon we're a Top 4 chance. He's not afraid to get in amongst it. After all, he has experience at the sharp end of things...

 
On 11/4/2020 at 6:18 PM, pineapple dee said:

Alright, let's analyse this sensibly. He was quite good at St Kilda. Not so good at Geelong. He's got attitude and injury issues and he's 30 years old. In a good environment he could become a decent player. Sounds like a good fit for the deees. 

It's yes from me !!

Sorry Pino your not fit to decide our next big recruit.!!

Need better personnel  at our Club!!!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Thanks
    • 566 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 40 replies