Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...
Posted
14 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Good to see Mitch finally make his debut for the Dogs. Good luck Mitch.

 

Good luck to him (except in about 4 week’s time when they play us).

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Best of luck Mitch! The old darl at the Woodend Mitre 10 has nothing to talk to me bout now you’ve left... so thanks for that.

Edited by Cards13
  • Haha 5
Posted
On 11/10/2020 at 10:43 PM, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Exactly the sort of player the Dogs don't need. They are in real trouble and 2016 is looking more and more like an aberration. 

This has aged beautifully.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Posted

Hard not to have a soft spot for Mitch after that moment in Geelong final in ‘18. Still gives me goosebumps when I watch the clip. Good luck Mitch!

  • Like 10
Posted

Yep I was devastated when he left but now I'm fine with it. Truth be told I kind of actually forgot about him until I heard he was playing tomorrow night. 

Good luck to him, I hope he plays well.

Yep that goal against geelong is still on my favourites. The look on Chris Scott's face is even better. 

. The 

  • Love 3
Posted

Good luck Mitch.!!!!!

Posted
16 hours ago, dees189227 said:

Yep I was devastated when he left but now I'm fine with it. Truth be told I kind of actually forgot about him until I heard he was playing tomorrow night. 

Good luck to him, I hope he plays well.

Yep that goal against geelong is still on my favourites. The look on Chris Scott's face is even better. 

. The 

As annoying as BT can often be, he absolutely nails this commentary.

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

As annoying as BT can often be, he absolutely nails this commentary.

I thought it was not that great to be honest. The Wheatley commentary was much better , then there's the Titanic mix that surpasses them all

  • Like 2
Posted
23 hours ago, Jaded said:

The only player to have left the club recently who won't be spewing. 

Best of luck to him! 

Agreed. A good outcome for him. But given dees forward structure and strategy i think there was no room for him and fritsch.

Mitch was a bit hot and cold but fritsch has become a 4 quarter threat and is more vetsatile.

  • Like 2
Posted

I caught a little bit of the Dogs v GWS VFL game the other day. I was really surprised by his size. Much bigger and taller than I remember. Looking forward to seeing him again tonight to confirm or realign my view.

I liked Mitch but he did just seem to keep getting injured. Wish him well.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, dees189227 said:

. The 

You have to handle it to the Cat supporting Whately for that call. If I was commentating that and my team was about to face certain finals elimination it would sound something like “ [censored], [censored]! miss it you [censored] “

Edited by FarNorthernD
  • Haha 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

As annoying as BT can often be, he absolutely nails this commentary.

Not BT !!! Gerard Whately ! 

Posted

On 11/10/2020 at 10:43 PM, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Hannan: Exactly the sort of player the Dogs don't need. They are in real trouble and 2016 is looking more and more like an aberration. 

On 4/29/2021 at 6:21 PM, A F said:

This has aged beautifully.

All the players with whom I have serious doubts [censored] themselves last night in the spotlight . . . Bruce (deary, deary me . . . their version of Chris Dawes, only much worse), Cordy (doesn't get to enough contests to kill the ball), Duryea (c-grader that played in a premiership surrounded by really good players), Hannan, Martin, Naughton, Schache (a gamble that hasn't paid off and shouldn't play another AFL game), JJ (what has happened to him?), West, Scott. Naughton still has time on his side, but the others either won't or can't improve. Their only first choice player not available last night, who makes a significant difference, is English. They have a respectable mid-field bunch, but field seriously flawed talls in both the back and front half. 

  • Like 1
  • Shocked 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

On 11/10/2020 at 10:43 PM, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Hannan: Exactly the sort of player the Dogs don't need. They are in real trouble and 2016 is looking more and more like an aberration. 

All the players with whom I have serious doubts [censored] themselves last night in the spotlight . . . Bruce (deary, deary me . . . their version of Chris Dawes, only much worse), Cordy (doesn't get to enough contests to kill the ball), Duryea (c-grader that played in a premiership surrounded by really good players), Hannan, Martin, Naughton, Schache (a gamble that hasn't paid off and shouldn't play another AFL game), JJ (what has happened to him?), West, Scott. Naughton still has time on his side, but the others either won't or can't improve. Their only first choice player not available last night, who makes a significant difference, is English. They have a respectable mid-field bunch, but field seriously flawed talls in both the back and front half. 

One of their better midfielders in Dunkley was not available. Would he have made the difference? Probably not, but you went early on the Bulldogs are in real trouble and I don't think it's justified. 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, A F said:

One of their better midfielders in Dunkley was not available. Would he have made the difference? Probably not, but you went early on the Bulldogs are in real trouble and I don't think it's justified. 

Agree AF. I wouldnt be writing them off yet after 1 bad half against a great team.

That midfield is still incredible (despite losing Dunkley) and will beat most teams. Their youngsters look good and their support players are good enough. 

In saying all that... Queanbeyan Demons analysis of their bad players is accurate too. 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

On 11/10/2020 at 10:43 PM, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Hannan: Exactly the sort of player the Dogs don't need. They are in real trouble and 2016 is looking more and more like an aberration. 

All the players with whom I have serious doubts [censored] themselves last night in the spotlight . . . Bruce (deary, deary me . . . their version of Chris Dawes, only much worse), Cordy (doesn't get to enough contests to kill the ball), Duryea (c-grader that played in a premiership surrounded by really good players), Hannan, Martin, Naughton, Schache (a gamble that hasn't paid off and shouldn't play another AFL game), JJ (what has happened to him?), West, Scott. Naughton still has time on his side, but the others either won't or can't improve. Their only first choice player not available last night, who makes a significant difference, is English. They have a respectable mid-field bunch, but field seriously flawed talls in both the back and front half. 

Naughton - despite his irritating coiffure - is an outstanding talent. But you're right about Bruce - and his hairdo is even more nauseating.

  • Like 2
Posted

Back to Mitch...showed a lot of what he did with us.

Missed an easy set shot which I said to my Tiges mate he would.

Had some nice cameos but went missing for a lot of the game.

  • Sad 1
Posted

He is a downhill skier, when the going gets tough he disappears rarely puts his body on the line and went missing in action.

I always said to others he is what Ray Jordan used to call a Jib.

  • Shocked 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...