Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
5 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 The Geelong Cats have been hit with a $40,000 fine for an "inadvertent administrative error" relating to its TPP.

FULL STORY >> https://bit.ly/32PXxyc

I'm sure that unlike Woolworths and a few of the high flying chefs their administrative error didn't involve underpaying the players.

 

"We accidentally, inadvertently recorded GAJ as being on $40K base salary with $2K match fees. Inadvertently, accidentally, to our complete shock and surprise, he was actually being paid $900K. We do not understand how this freak error could have occurred. The unpaid intern responsible for negotiating his contact and lodging the paperwork has been sacked. The highly paid executive and board member responsible for hiding this from the AFL has also been sacked."

This actually seems legit to me. Someone forgot to carry the "y" and it didn't add up.

 

Maybe I'm to young and naive?


The lack of detail in the announcement suggests it's far more sinister than a simple oops.

This has been going on for 8 years? In that time they've signed Dangerfield, Ablett Jnr, who else?

How does Carlton feel about the $40k 'penalty'?

28 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Jeelong always get off lightly

HATE THEM

Smug Bastards 

Sir, it is clear that footy season is nearly upon us. The emotion and hate is back. Isn't great.

Edited by hemingway

 
22 minutes ago, hemingway said:

Sir, it is clear that footy season is nearly upon us. The emotion and hate is back. Isn't great.

Did you leave "it" out?

The fact Geelong have been paying over the salary cap for 8 years tells me they only self reported once the AFL HQ finally got wind of it. They should of been fined 500k! It might seem a bit steep, but it's complete rubbish the Geelong finance department didn't pick up on over expenditure. 


49 minutes ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

Salary cap inaccuracies deserve more than a $50k fine

Yep. Players have been recruited outside the laws

8 years is a long time to not notice a thing

Absolute BS

8 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Yep. Players have been recruited outside the laws

8 years is a long time to not notice a thing

Absolute BS

Clubs perceived by the AFL to be powerful regularly get off lightly.  Yet minnows like us get whacked all the time.  To call the error "inadvertent" is a cop out of the highest order.  A failure to abide by your fiduciary obligations, for any "business" is inexcusable.  Ignorance is no excuse under the Law

8 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

so what exactly was the error they'd been making?

Having Chris Scott as there coach.


10 hours ago, hemingway said:

Sir, it is clear that footy season is nearly upon us. The emotion and hate is back. Isn't great.

Keeps me warm at night.

Too difficult to work out if the punishment fits the crime when there is no information supplied.

We will just have to trust the AFL have done the right thing... Its not like the AFL have tried to cover things up before.

Steve Hocking looking after his own club. What a surprise.

Its been a repeated mistake over 8 years! Ole mate Ken Wood obviously isn't looking to hard!

 


$5K a year for 8 years doesn't sound like much of a fine. Players get that for a melee.

Nobody should be surprised.

Bomber Thompson, Dank, The Weapon...   Geelong are equal with West Coast as the biggest cheating scum club in the country.

 

They gained an advantage over the other clubs for 8 years and played in a heap of finals, its irrelevant whether the error was inadvertent or not. And how does one prove an error is inadvertent and not deliberate !?!?

Curious that there was no mention of the amount they were over the TPP, which makes me suspect that it wasn't an insignificant amount. Also curious, that the error was discovered by the new chief financial officer while others who over saw it have convenient left

People need to be jumping up and down about this and demanding some transparency.

Edited by Demons1858

2 hours ago, Demons1858 said:

They gained an advantage over the other clubs for 8 years and played in a heap of finals, its irrelevant whether the error was inadvertent or not. And how does one prove an error is inadvertent and not deliberate !?!?

Curious that there was no mention of the amount they were over the TPP, which makes me suspect that it wasn't an insignificant amount. Also curious, that the error was discovered by the new chief financial officer while others who over saw it have convenient left

People need to be jumping up and down about this and demanding some transparency.

It wasn't even written to suggest the issue was an over-payment, it only suggested something like a lodgement error. The lack of information and the misinformation really make it look like this is a complete cover up.

Genuine fines, draft sanctions. These are the penalties for over-payment, not $5K a year.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 32 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 163 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 531 replies