Potential Trades [Warning: Reading this thread may self-destruct]

[dee-luded 2,958]

The Hawks' start was similar to Essendon's against us in 2000.

A few of our young players were punched up early and no-one stood up at the time....

this is why I want the Roos culture thru this club, then add a more rugged edge. close to the Bomba's Cats with Scarlett Chappy & Moondog in the side.

[Gate 5 21]

First time poster, long time lurker but wanted to share what I have heard

Pick 2 to Richmond for Pick 10 and Conca to MFC.

[Deemotivated 550]

First time poster, long time lurker but wanted to share what I have heard

Pick 2 to Richmond for Pick 10 and Conca to MFC.

Overs

[Wilson7 2,532]

God i hope not, Conca is a big step down from a Shiel or Dangerfield

First time poster, long time lurker but wanted to share what I have heard

Pick 2 to Richmond for Pick 10 and Conca to MFC.

[whatwhat say what 19,314]

Eek. Conca is awful. No thanks.

[Deestroy All 14,262]

First time poster, long time lurker but wanted to share what I have heard

Pick 2 to Richmond for Pick 10 and Conca to MFC.

If that happens, I'm out. Seriously.

Conca is no Tyson, he is now what he'll always be.

[Deecisive 1,658]

I think we should forget Dangerfield he would be a massive gain but we would need to pay massive overs to get him to come to our club I believe we could probably do a lot better just trading with GWS and get the best deal with can for 3 or 4 of their young players who want to return/leave, i would be looking to swap 2 and 3 and a possibly a late pick for Cameron, Frost, Shiel and Treloar,

[Binmans PA 26,302]

I'd take Conca for a second rounder though, if we had the appropriate pick.

[Binmans PA 26,302]

I think we should forget Dangerfield he would be a massive gain but we would need to pay massive overs to get him to come to our club I believe we could probably do a lot better just trading with GWS and get the best deal with can for 3 or 4 of their young players who want to return/leave, i would be looking to swap 2 and 3 and a possibly a late pick for Cameron, Frost, Shiel and Treloar,

Lol, that'd be great, but there's no way they'd give up their three best players and a promising KPP for picks 2 and 3.

[Pipefitter 2,027]

I think we should forget Dangerfield he would be a massive gain but we would need to pay massive overs to get him to come to our club I believe we could probably do a lot better just trading with GWS and get the best deal with can for 3 or 4 of their young players who want to return/leave, i would be looking to swap 2 and 3 and a possibly a late pick for Cameron, Frost, Shiel and Treloar,

If we can get away with only using one of those prized picks and relieving ourselves of toumpas, do it. Keep 1 for Brayshaw. Its just a dream though isn't it?

[Moneider96 1,045]

First time poster, long time lurker but wanted to share what I have heard

Pick 2 to Richmond for Pick 10 and Conca to MFC.

KWORMOIWMEIRMWEOIFMWOIFMORIGMMFEOIGMIOEMOIGMERGE. That's how I feel about that

Edited September 28, 2014 by Moneider96

[Moonshadow 16,347]

First time poster, long time lurker but wanted to share what I have heard

Pick 2 to Richmond for Pick 10 and Conca to MFC.

Conca is all elbows.

[ChaserJ 3,972]

First time poster, long time lurker but wanted to share what I have heard

Pick 2 to Richmond for Pick 10 and Conca to MFC.

Hells no.

[Demoneyes 562]

First time poster, long time lurker but wanted to share what I have heard

Pick 2 to Richmond for Pick 10 and Conca to MFC.

Welcome gate 5! Although the above have seem to have shot you down in flames don't be afraid to post again. We can always use an extra discussion point as well as a bit of mirth and jocularity!

[Bombay Airconditioning 5,945]

My understanding having checked with a source (no I won't name the source, choose to disregard if that's not good enough for you):

- MFC representatives (players) have met with Dangerfield

- New environment for Clark is on advice from his health professional

- Pick 2 and/or one of Toumpas or Trengove a possibility to go to Crows if Dangerfield wants to come

- Club sees pick 3 compensation as better list management strategic value than keeping Frawley

All things that have been floating around these boards and none of them means there is any certain outcome, but that's probably reality for this time of year. Lots of maybes and activity floating around, but nothing locked away and done deal yet.

Sorry but how is that news? That's what's been thrown up on here over the last couple of weeks with no sources.

[Moneider96 1,045]

Sorry but how is that news? That's what's been thrown up on here over the last couple of weeks with no sources.

I guess it's just confirmation. Nothing wrong that!

[Ethan Tremblay 28,470]

Sorry but how is that news? That's what's been thrown up on here over the last couple of weeks with no sources.

Exactly, have heard all that 10 times over.

[TeamPlayedFine39 8,186]

First time poster, long time lurker but wanted to share what I have heard

Pick 2 to Richmond for Pick 10 and Conca to MFC.

Looks like a pretty raw deal for the Dees.

If true, however, we could trade on pick 10 to Adelaide and make it 3 and 10 for Dangerfield.

Making: MFC picks 2 and 3 = Dangerfield and Conca.

Would rather deal with GWS personally.

[Moneider96 1,045]

Looks like a pretty raw deal for the Dees.

If true, however, we could trade on pick 10 to Adelaide and make it 3 and 10 for Dangerfield.

Making: MFC picks 2 and 3 = Dangerfield and Conca.

Would rather deal with GWS personally.

pick 3 and 10 won't get Dangerfied.

[Harry Plopper 105]

pick 3 and 10 won't get Dangerfied.

You'd be surprised. Melbourne might say its these picks or enjoy your one free agency pick next year.

[Straight Sets Simon 23,113]

First time poster, long time lurker but wanted to share what I have heard

Pick 2 to Richmond for Pick 10 and Conca to MFC.

I wouldn't trade Jake Spencer for Conca.

[Demoneyes 562]

Besides we don't actually have pick 3 yet so it is hypothetical (although it's supposed to be a given). Will stand by pick 2, toump and draft positional changes

[Demoneyes 562]

I wouldn't trade Jake Spencer for Conca.

I don't want either of them!

[stevethemanjordan 6,952]

I wouldn't trade Jake Spencer for Conca.

You went a bit far methinks Clint.

I most certainly would do that trade.

[Lampers 563]

Exactly, have heard all that 10 times over.

No problem, just pretend you didn't read it.

Those are confirmed as talked about within the club, which is more than potential journalist's conjecture and speculation.