Jump to content

Time is up for some players


All the Jacks

Recommended Posts

The Machiavellian approach to list management would be to praise heavily players you want someone to take off your hands. So, Roos's praise of Watts could be genuine or it could be a plan to increase his trade value.

(Note: I don't for one minute believe Roos's comments about Watts are anything other than genuine).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Machiavellian approach to list management would be to praise heavily players you want someone to take off your hands. So, Roos's praise of Watts could be genuine or it could be a plan to increase his trade value.

(Note: I don't for one minute believe Roos's comments about Watts are anything other than genuine).

Unfortunately for the club and supporters,he wont be flicked.

For 6 years hes done 2/5ths of stuff all,so this year is all breakout and up up upward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately for the club and supporters,he wont be flicked.

For 6 years hes done 2/5ths of stuff all,so this year is all breakout and up up upward.

"2/5ths of stuff all"

That is a small number jazza!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The three jacks are a failed experiment. We need to move them on. Its unfortunate but to continue with these boys is a mistake and will ensure our continuing failure as an AFL team. Ad to that Frawley, Jamar and the way Garland is going him as well. Massive clean out needed but probably wont happen. More pain to follow dees fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The three jacks are a failed experiment. We need to move them on. Its unfortunate but to continue with these boys is a mistake and will ensure our continuing failure as an AFL team. Ad to that Frawley, Jamar and the way Garland is going him as well. Massive clean out needed but probably wont happen. More pain to follow dees fans.

Certainly cheered me up Frost!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Bitter but we have to face facts. We are likely to finish bottom because of this. And the future is more of the same. Imagine what this is doing to our good players. The best Melbourne player out there in the Geelong game was Jared Rivers; WE NEED REAL FOOTBALLERS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry earl, who does he coach, haven't head of him

The Cardinals?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The Cardinals?

close but no cigar

Current coaching staff[edit]
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The three jacks are a failed experiment. We need to move them on. Its unfortunate but to continue with these boys is a mistake and will ensure our continuing failure as an AFL team. Ad to that Frawley, Jamar and the way Garland is going him as well. Massive clean out needed but probably wont happen. More pain to follow dees fans.

Frosty Demon Deletions:

Trengove, Grimes, Watts, Frawley, Garland, Jamar, and ???

Do you think taking the last 5 players in the draft at 110, 111, 112, 113, and 114 will make our list better and give us REAL FOOTBALLERS?

Or do you think it's just more hot air and empty hate?

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Bitter but we have to face facts. We are likely to finish bottom because of this. And the future is more of the same. Imagine what this is doing to our good players. The best Melbourne player out there in the Geelong game was Jared Rivers; WE NEED REAL FOOTBALLERS

What absolute rubbish. We will not finish bottom and we should not get rid of Watts, Trengove or Garland.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Bitter but we have to face facts. We are likely to finish bottom because of this. And the future is more of the same. Imagine what this is doing to our good players. The best Melbourne player out there in the Geelong game was Jared Rivers; WE NEED REAL FOOTBALLERS

What a load of rubbish. This is yet to be determined. These kids are still young and have been playing in a badly coached and side and have had to shoulder the leadership burdon way too young. There is still up side in them all.

Watts, Grimes and Trenners need time, development and on field support. there are plenty of people on the list to go before them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a load of rubbish, what a load of rubbish, you guys are funny. I would take picks from any where in the draft ahead of these guys. I've seen what our guys have and it isn't good enough; but that's just me. Its definitely not hot air or hate either its just my opinion. I have total respect for these guys as I believe they give everything they have got. They work their arses off, but they are not the ones who need on field support our good players do. These guys hold our team back and we will continue to struggle while they are on board.

As for finishing bottom we are only one game above he saints and we never looked like beating them in round one. do we play them again???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a load of rubbish, what a load of rubbish, you guys are funny. I would take picks from any where in the draft ahead of these guys. I've seen what our guys have and it isn't good enough; but that's just me. Its definitely not hot air or hate either its just my opinion. I have total respect for these guys as I believe they give everything they have got. They work their arses off, but they are not the ones who need on field support our good players do. These guys hold our team back and we will continue to struggle while they are on board.

As for finishing bottom we are only one game above he saints and we never looked like beating them in round one. do we play them again???

Read my post in the other thread - you are angry at the wrong things and your remedy wouldn't help it would only make things worse.

12 months removed from Neeld and have people learnt nothing about how to manage players and build a list?

Essentially blaming flankers and pockets for our problems - which centres around our lack of a capable midfield - is missing the point. Neeld missed it when he was giving verbals to Watts and the other 'problems' instead of trying to get us a capable midfield.

If Roos gets another Vince, Tyson, Cross and Salem, JKH in the draft - maybe we will win more games than we lose.

Getting rid of our senior players won't help us win more.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not angry, a little crazy from hearing Tom Harley referring to us repeatedly as a young team.

My remedy is just to get rid of players that aren't up to it and replace them with ones that are. I said nothing about getting rid of senior players.

You are right if Roos gets more capable players in then we will be better. We do however have to get rid of those that don't produce. Those six players you mentioned earlier are some of the most unproductive players in the AFL. Keep them and we will see more of the same. Move them on and bring in better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not angry, a little crazy from hearing Tom Harley referring to us repeatedly as a young team.

My remedy is just to get rid of players that aren't up to it and replace them with ones that are. I said nothing about getting rid of senior players.

You are right if Roos gets more capable players in then we will be better. We do however have to get rid of those that don't produce. Those six players you mentioned earlier are some of the most unproductive players in the AFL. Keep them and we will see more of the same. Move them on and bring in better.

I think what most are trying to get across Frosty is that where is this 'better' going to come from? In some aspects I agree with your sentiments - we have a raft of players who don't produce enough for the talent they have, but they are not the players to move on. The draft, regardless of who you take, is never a sure thing and if we move on the players you mentioned we have to be CERTAIN that we are improving our list in doing so. Just going to the draft, for example, is not the answer in our case. We need quality to replace these players but to just say we can do it is naive at best and doesn't give us an answer. It's one thing to want to move them on, it's another to do it and improve the list, and I don't think we can do that right now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm not angry, a little crazy from hearing Tom Harley referring to us repeatedly as a young team.

My remedy is just to get rid of players that aren't up to it and replace them with ones that are. I said nothing about getting rid of senior players.

You are right if Roos gets more capable players in then we will be better. We do however have to get rid of those that don't produce. Those six players you mentioned earlier are some of the most unproductive players in the AFL. Keep them and we will see more of the same. Move them on and bring in better.

Every team wants to rid their list of players that aren't up for it and replace them. It's a very easy suggestion but the answer is a lot harder. Where do all the "better" players come from? We'd need a lot of them.

Edited by Ethan Tremblay
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And does it not follow you get the most bang for buck moving on the WORST players on the list not, not those players that get regular games in the 1s irrespective of how frustrating they can be at times? Unless of course you can trade up an NQR but that is harder to get right.

Edited by Radar Detector
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 list changes is about the maximum and that would probably include swapping a draft pick for 2 picks (or 2 players or such like) It would also probably involve bringing in a free agent and/or an unlisted free agent or 2.

Or perhaps we could trade out a contracted player or 2 but which club or clubs would want a Roos reject? Unfortunately, just like last year, we're going to be stuck with 5 or 6 players who we ordinarily wouldn't want to keep. The reality is, we need to make the most of what we've got and keep bringing in as much talent as possible.

In any given year, the best any club can hope for is to bring in 6 good* players ... so, in the wash-up, if we "move on" and then recruit 10 players in the off season, there's a good chance that only a maximum of 6 of those 10 players will end up being good players for the club.

*A good player could be described as someone who plays for at least 7 or 8 years, is rarely if ever dropped, has 3-5 top 10 finishes in the B&F and is a big contributor to the team having predominantly winning seasons. You'd take 6 of those type of recruits in any given year in a heartbeat.

Edited by Macca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys you are right it isn't an easy fix. I just believe that when a player has had five or more years and isn't producing consistently he should be seriously considered for trade. We also should only bring in real footballers. There are plenty out there and with Roosys collateral he should be able to attract more. This years recruiting was good and our draft picks look promising. We have to be bold and do the same and better for next year. Unfortunately this means being bold in who we get rid of. Fortune favours the brave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys you are right it isn't an easy fix. I just believe that when a player has had five or more years and isn't producing consistently he should be seriously considered for trade. We also should only bring in real footballers. There are plenty out there and with Roosys collateral he should be able to attract more. This years recruiting was good and our draft picks look promising. We have to be bold and do the same and better for next year. Unfortunately this means being bold in who we get rid of. Fortune favours the brave.

Always like your posts Frost. However you like a pervert I once met - can you explain?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys you are right it isn't an easy fix. I just believe that when a player has had five or more years and isn't producing consistently he should be seriously considered for trade. We also should only bring in real footballers. There are plenty out there and with Roosys collateral he should be able to attract more. This years recruiting was good and our draft picks look promising. We have to be bold and do the same and better for next year. Unfortunately this means being bold in who we get rid of. Fortune favours the brave.

He should be at least considered before writing off blokes who haven't been on the list for 2 years yet, such as someone whose first name begins with Jimmy and last begins with Toumpas...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    WARNING by William from Waalitj

    As a long term resident of Waalitj Marawar, I am moved to warn my fellow Narrm fans that a  danger game awaits. The locals are no longer the easybeats who stumbled, fumbled and bumbled their way to the good fortune of gathering the number one draft pick and a generational player in Harley Reid last year. They are definitely better than they were then.   Young Harley has already proven his worth with some stellar performances for a first year kid playing among men. He’s taken hangers, k

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 20

    OVER YET? by KC from Casey

    The Friday evening rush hour clash of two of the VFL’s 2024 minnows, Carlton and the Casey Demons was excruciatingly painful to watch, even if it was for the most part a close encounter. I suppose that since the game had to produce a result (a tie would have done the game some justice), the four points that went to Casey with the win, were fully justified because they went to the best team. In that respect, my opinion is based on the fact that the Blues were a lopsided combination that had

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    CENTIMETRES by Whispering Jack

    Our game is one where the result is often decided by centimetres; the touch of a fingernail, a split-second decision made by a player or official, the angle of vision or the random movement of an oblong ball in flight or in its bounce and trajectory. There is one habit that Melbourne seems to have developed of late in its games against Carlton which is that the Demons keep finding themselves on the wrong end of the stick in terms of the fine line in close games at times when centimetres mak

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    PREGAME: Rd 10 vs West Coast

    The Demons have a 10 day break before they head on the road to Perth to take on the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 522

    PODCAST: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Sunday, 12th May @ 8:30pm. Join George, Binman & I as we analyse the Demons loss at the MCG against the Blues in the Round 09. You questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human. Listen & Chat LIVE:

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 30

    VOTES: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    Last week Captain Max Gawn consolidated his lead over reigning champion Christian Petracca in the Demonland Player of the Year Award. Steven May, Jake Lever, Jack Viney & Clayton Oliver make up the Top 5. Your votes for the loss against the Blues. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 39

    POSTGAME: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    The Demons were blown out of the water in the first quarter and clawed their way back into the contest but it was a case of too little too late as they lost another close one to Carlton losing by 1 point at the MCG.  

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 486

    GAMEDAY: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    It's Game Day and the Demons are once again headlining another blockbuster at the MCG to kick off the round of footy. The Dees take on the Blues and have the opportunity to win their third game on the trot to solidify a spot in the Top 4 in addition to handing the Blues their third consecutive defeat to bundle them out of the Top 8.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 959

    MELBOURNE BUSINESS by The Oracle

    In days of old, this week’s Thursday night AFL match up between the Demons and the Blues would be framed on the basis of the need to redress the fact that Carlton “stole” last year’s semi final away from Melbourne and with it, their hopes for the premiership.  A hot gospelling coach might point out to his charges that they were the better team on the night in all facets and that poor kicking for goal and a couple of lapses at the death cost them what was rightfully theirs. Moreover, now was

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews 1
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...