Jump to content

Featured Replies

13 minutes ago, Axis of Bob said:

Big boy forward which probably gives us a complementary skill set from Schache and Fullarton. Seems less mobile than them but willing to camp under the high ball and compete, which we need.Ā 

Old fashioned style of forward so I’m excited to see how his skill set translates to AF L level.

Going to be an interesting Casey team with Jefferson, Brown, Fullarton, Schache and Kentfield in the same forward line!

Ah old style forward?? Big Bob Johnson says Hi!!šŸ˜‚šŸ¤©

Ā 
4 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

A little disappointed that we overlooked the chance for immediate help for a project tall who hasn’t really done anything to suggest he’d be an in demand pick in the top 45 of the national draft.

But obviously we need more tall forward help and in JT we trust.Ā 

Skills look nice and seems to understand using his body, height/athleticism (if destined to play back up ruck as well as forward) and output are probably the question marks.

Had enough of project players.

 
32 minutes ago, sisso said:

The next Tom Hawkins?

Didn't see greasy arms though. Ā 

28 minutes ago, The Stigga said:

He played with Koltyn at WA rep, he's put in a good word for him!

Ā 

Kolt and Filthy Luker can combine for our record breaking 2025,6,7,8,9 flags

15 minutes ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

Next Tony Lockett

I would be very disappointed were he to go, after starring for us, to Sydney.

Ā 

But in all seriousness, welcome - but be warned that there are posters lurking here who will call you a spud, loser etc if you don't become a superstar within a couple of years.

Edited by monoccular


29 minutes ago, The Stigga said:

He played with Koltyn at WA rep, he's put in a good word for him!

Ā 

Would have played together at Subiaco as well.

2 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Didn't see greasy arms though. Ā 

Kolt and Filthy Luker can combine for our record breaking 2025,6,7,8,9 flags

I would be very disappointed were he to go, after starring for us, to Sydney.

Ā 

But in all seriousness, welcome - but be warned that there are posters lurking here who will call you a spud, loser etc if you don't become a superstar within a couple of years. weeks.

fixed.

Hard no for me and the reasons are he can kick for goal, fritta won't allow that, he can play on straight away and pass a ball at eye level and can mark so that's to many problems for us to get that out of him.....

Oh it's sarcasm folks so settle down.

Ā 

He looks like he's quite natural at the forward/second ruck role which is exciting! amazing he slipped to the MSD

Worth a shot. He ticks a lot of boxes from the reports. Mid season draft picks don’t normally pan out so I have no issue swinging for the fences with a Forward/Ruck. Good luck Luker.


7 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Didn't see greasy arms though. Ā 

Kolt and Filthy Luker can combine for our record breaking 2025,6,7,8,9 flags

I would be very disappointed were he to go, after starring for us, to Sydney.

Ā 

But in all seriousness, welcome - but be warned that there are posters lurking here who will call you a spud, loser etc if you don't become a superstar within a couple of years.

Within a couple of games……. 😳

No surprise we targeted a key forward not a mid.

Coz 99 problems and our mids ain't one.

Edited by binman

3 minutes ago, binman said:

99 problems and are mids ain't one.

that is solid manĀ 

Well the forward line for Casey will be top heavy.

Seniors

B: Lever, May, McVee

HB: Rivers, McDonald, Bowey

C: C.Windsor, Salem, Langdon

HF: Petracca, Petty, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Pickett

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Viney

IC: Tomlinson, Sparrow, Hunter, Chandler

SUB: Woewodin

Casey

B: Hore, Adams, Howes

HB: Connelly, Schache, Moniz-Wakefield

C: K.Brown, Tholstrup, Billings

HF: Sestan, Turner, Spargo

Ā F: Melksham, Jefferson, McAdam

FOLL: Verrall, White, Laurie

IC: Fullerton, Kentfield, B.Brown, Hustwaite, K.Windsor

EMERG: Steele, Freeman, Gregory


1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

A little disappointed that we overlooked the chance for immediate help for a project tall who hasn’t really done anything to suggest he’d be an in demand pick in the top 45 of the national draft.

But obviously we need more tall forward help and in JT we trust.Ā 

Skills look nice and seems to understand using his body, height/athleticism (if destined to play back up ruck as well as forward) and output are probably the question marks.

yikes-rachel-dratch.gif

32 minutes ago, monoccular said:

But in all seriousness, welcome - but be warned that there are posters lurking here who will call you a spud, loser etc if you don't become a superstar within a couple of years.

Couple of years. For some it will be a couple of games.

But yes welcome, the opportunity is thereĀ 

Ā 

14 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

Well the forward line for Casey will be top heavy.

Seniors

B: Lever, May, McVee

HB: Rivers, McDonald, Bowey

C: C.Windsor, Salem, Langdon

HF: Petracca, Petty, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Pickett

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Viney

IC: Tomlinson, Sparrow, Hunter, Chandler

SUB: Woewodin

Casey

B: Hore, Adams, Howes

HB: Connelly, Schache, Moniz-Wakefield

C: K.Brown, Tholstrup, Billings

HF: Sestan, Turner, Spargo

Ā F: Melksham, Jefferson, McAdam

FOLL: Verrall, White, Laurie

IC: Fullerton, Kentfield, B.Brown, Hustwaite, K.Windsor

EMERG: Steele, Freeman, Gregory

tomlinson ain't in our best 23

Speculative pick considering we have a few KPFs clogging the list.Ā 

Unless this guy could make an immediate impact I would have preferredĀ building the mid depth.Ā 


Interesting message to Fullarton and Schache. Ā If they were up to it, would we be cutting their lunch selecting this kid??

1 minute ago, layzie said:

Speculative pick considering we have a few KPFs clogging the list.Ā 

Unless this guy could make an immediate impact I would have preferredĀ building the mid depth.Ā 

Yes we do but not many we can actually pick. I suspect shache isn’t playing another game at the dees, BBB can maybe play a couple more but also may also be finished. Pettys injury may re flare… perhaps it already has. Fullerton is there but not yet in frame and jeffo may mot play til 25.Ā So if Petty or JVR go down we have no one really that’s ready despite a list of names.Ā 

26 minutes ago, binman said:

No surprise we targeted a key forward not a mid.

Coz 99 problems and are mids ain't one.

The midfield that’s needed Nibbler and Kossie to go on ball to provide some run and speed, has had to move Langdon to half forward to have run there and is suddenly relying on Hunter again doesn’t need reinforcements?

I can see the case that no one really stood out, but we’d be silly if we don’t reinforce the midfield and mid/forward depth this offseason.

Ā 
1 hour ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Surely, the nickname will be ā€œFilthyā€ (Luker)?

Does he live on the 2nd floor?

I don't mind it at all provided we're looking to build mid field at the trade table at year's end

A big bodied forward who seems quite agile.Ā  Might be a nice point of difference in our mix.

Maybe get a gun ex forward down on contract to show him, Roo and Jeffo some of the finer points of forward craft in this second half of the season.Ā  Might help fast track them a little.Ā  Couldn't hurt surely?

Edited by Demon Dynasty


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 213 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Ā Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 523 replies