Jump to content

Featured Replies

9 hours ago, Stiff Arm said:

Luke Hodge, Jacob Weitering and Sam Walsh?

But it's a decision for now, not the past

Weitering wasnt even the best at his club that year. Walsh isnt clearly the best player either. 

 
46 minutes ago, Bay Riffin said:

Weitering wasnt even the best at his club that year. Walsh isnt clearly the best player either. 

Walsh has been the better player over his years than any other in that draft, and that's saying something because it was a hugely talented draft year 

Regardless, the point was that we're drafting for the future, not based upon who was taken at what pick in the past

Surely WC need the spread of players that a trade up from North offers them. 

They're list in a worse place than North's right now yes?

North would be pretty keen and kind of fits their list profile to top up with what is supposedly the cream of the crop and put an exclamation on top of their recent ins.

WC so devoid of talent.  Do they have a big draft hand outside of 1?

Haven't checked.

Also if North trade a few with WC to get Reid does that help our chances at all to land Sanders or someone close to him that is genuinly rated.

Must say, outside of Reid, i like the look of Caddy and, in particular, Sanders.

Sanders probably given he appears to fit the inside/outside mid option we've been looking for who can also find the odd goal.

Caddy appears to be a mostly medium-tall forward / part-time mid option yes?

 
18 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

The talk of burning multiple first round and even top-5 picks to get Pick 1 deeply scares me.

For all the hype, you have to go back to Nick Riewoldt to find a no.1 pick who was the best player in their draft. Maybe Brendan Goddard in that season's overall pretty weak draft.

Less than 1 in 20 isn't a good enough strike rate to give up multiple picks which have almost as good (or in the case of picks 4 and 5, better) strike rates!

Please could everyone spare a thought for my nerves and stop chasing only the shiniest stone? :laugh:

The wrong player is often picked at number 1.

In 2015 we traded to up the draft order to get Clarry at number 4 when no one else rated him that highly.

We apparently haven't interviewed Reid but if we do trade to get that pick i am confident we will get it right.


Interview in The Age today identifies North, Hawks, GWS and Gold Coast as the clubs that have interviewed him. Interesting that we apparently have not shown interest, at least so far. 

34 minutes ago, pitmaster said:

Interview in The Age today identifies North, Hawks, GWS and Gold Coast as the clubs that have interviewed him. Interesting that we apparently have not shown interest, at least so far. 

Are we actually after Reid ?

It to me seems highly unlikely we could manufacture a path to his selection.

Im thinking we have a couple of others in mind..ie.. 2 players... in top 12.

Quite possibly the Dees for Harley is some form of construct..  but more a smokescreen 

Imagine we traded 3, 12 and 32 in for the number 1 pick in 2019? 

Hasn’t been a kid rated higher than Rowell for many years. 9 brownlow votes in first three games then injuries 

Instead we have Kozzi, Rivers and LJ (pick 5/13)

too risky and we are too good at picking guns in the top 30

Reid looks very good playing VFL and should be a gun but i Don’t think he’ll be Chris Judd

 
10 hours ago, DubDee said:

Imagine we traded 3, 12 and 32 in for the number 1 pick in 2019? 

Hasn’t been a kid rated higher than Rowell for many years. 9 brownlow votes in first three games then injuries 

Instead we have Kozzi, Rivers and LJ (pick 5/13)

too risky and we are too good at picking guns in the top 30

Reid looks very good playing VFL and should be a gun but i Don’t think he’ll be Chris Judd

So, just to be clear, what you're saying is that we should pick this year's draftees based upon who has or hasn't been been picked in the past, not solely on the quality of draftees available this year?

Ok then 🤔

9 minutes ago, Stiff Arm said:

So, just to be clear, what you're saying is that we should pick this year's draftees based upon who has or hasn't been been picked in the past, not solely on the quality of draftees available this year?

Ok then 🤔

I read it as an example. 
 

Don’t miss the irony Stiffy. 🤣


I seriously hope the club uses the picks we have accumulate in the draft order and doesn't put them towards a tilt a Reid.

We did well from the 2019 draft selecting the talent from our allocated picks eg. Kozi, Riv and Jacko.

1 hour ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

I seriously hope the club uses the picks we have accumulate in the draft order and doesn't put them towards a tilt a Reid.

We did well from the 2019 draft selecting the talent from our allocated picks eg. Kozi, Riv and Jacko.

It depends if the club values the 2023 draft crop as strongly as the 2019 crop.

3 hours ago, Stiff Arm said:

So, just to be clear, what you're saying is that we should pick this year's draftees based upon who has or hasn't been been picked in the past, not solely on the quality of draftees available this year?

Ok then 🤔

absolutely not.

you’re putting words in my mouth 

11 minutes ago, Binmans PA said:

It depends if the club values the 2023 draft crop as strongly as the 2019 crop.

I hope for the sake of our draft hand the crop is a strong one in 2023.

Anyone in the know who rates the 2023 draft talent?

  • 2 weeks later...

Somebody somewhere mentioned that Johnathan Brown, a f/s taken at 30-something, was best in his draft and that made be go back and look because I may be the only person on earth who thinks Brown is a little overrated.

Just conversationally, of course!

That was in the 1999 draft, where pick 1 was Josh Fraser, a poor reward for Collingwood's blatant tanking.

Overall it is widely considered the original 'superdraft' with some 25 players cracking the 200 game barrier, multiple club captains and club champions, repeated All-Australians and so on. Curiously, the talent was spread almost evenly through the draft, all the way to the likes of Ryan O'Keefe and Cameron Bruce very late in the process.

It also offers a terrific contest for 'best of draft' because the absolute top few players are each completely different with very different credentials. The contenders:

J Brown: 256 games, 594 goals (2.3/games), 2x all-Australian, 3x B&F, 3 premierships, 1 Coleman medal, 7 season captain or co-captain of Brisbane.

C Enright; 332 games, 6x all-Australian, 2x B&F - both in premiership teams, 3 premierships.

M Pavlich: 352 games, 700 goals (2.0/game), 6x B&F, 8 seasons as captain, 6x all-Australian. Played for Fremantle so automatically excused from premiership count.

For me, it is Pavlich, then Enright, then Brown, but the margins aren't large.

Pavlich has it in my opinion because he is only barely shaded by Brown for forward-line performance over his career, despite also grabbing an all-Australian spot at full-back when young (those David Neitz positive vibes hitting me), and being used much more all over the ground to cover for Fremantle being mostly rubbish.

57 minutes ago, Little Goffy said:

Somebody somewhere mentioned that Johnathan Brown, a f/s taken at 30-something, was best in his draft and that made be go back and look because I may be the only person on earth who thinks Brown is a little overrated.

Just conversationally, of course!

That was in the 1999 draft, where pick 1 was Josh Fraser, a poor reward for Collingwood's blatant tanking.

Overall it is widely considered the original 'superdraft' with some 25 players cracking the 200 game barrier, multiple club captains and club champions, repeated All-Australians and so on. Curiously, the talent was spread almost evenly through the draft, all the way to the likes of Ryan O'Keefe and Cameron Bruce very late in the process.

It also offers a terrific contest for 'best of draft' because the absolute top few players are each completely different with very different credentials. The contenders:

J Brown: 256 games, 594 goals (2.3/games), 2x all-Australian, 3x B&F, 3 premierships, 1 Coleman medal, 7 season captain or co-captain of Brisbane.

C Enright; 332 games, 6x all-Australian, 2x B&F - both in premiership teams, 3 premierships.

M Pavlich: 352 games, 700 goals (2.0/game), 6x B&F, 8 seasons as captain, 6x all-Australian. Played for Fremantle so automatically excused from premiership count.

For me, it is Pavlich, then Enright, then Brown, but the margins aren't large.

Pavlich has it in my opinion because he is only barely shaded by Brown for forward-line performance over his career, despite also grabbing an all-Australian spot at full-back when young (those David Neitz positive vibes hitting me), and being used much more all over the ground to cover for Fremantle being mostly rubbish.

Dan Curtin said he models himself on Pav - just sayin' ...

On 08/10/2023 at 07:54, pitmaster said:

Interview in The Age today identifies North, Hawks, GWS and Gold Coast as the clubs that have interviewed him. Interesting that we apparently have not shown interest, at least so far. 

Every single club would have interviewed him at the combine 

On a related note namely North Melbourne's draft picks the number of delisted/retiring players at North is amazing:

7 players delisted

4 players retired

2 players traded

About one third of the list

5 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

On a related note namely North Melbourne's draft picks the number of delisted/retiring players at North is amazing:

7 players delisted

4 players retired

2 players traded

About one third of the list

Wowsers – how many have come in?


12 minutes ago, DemonWheels said:

Wowsers – how many have come in?

From the AFL site

The Kangaroos brought Dylan Stephens, Zac Fisher and Bigoa Nyuon in during the Continental Tyres AFL Trade Period, while they also signed ex-Swans rookie Toby Pink as a delisted free agent.

28 minutes ago, DemonWheels said:

Wowsers – how many have come in?

13 out

4 in

9 picks over national/rookie draft or perhaps a delisted free agent plus spot held over for a pre-seasom supplemental selection.

They have 5 first rounders then picks 57 and 82.

 
15 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Harley would be a Triumph.

He's no Indian 

2 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

Somebody somewhere mentioned that Johnathan Brown, a f/s taken at 30-something, was best in his draft and that made be go back and look because I may be the only person on earth who thinks Brown is a little overrated.

Just conversationally, of course!

That was in the 1999 draft, where pick 1 was Josh Fraser, a poor reward for Collingwood's blatant tanking.

Overall it is widely considered the original 'superdraft' with some 25 players cracking the 200 game barrier, multiple club captains and club champions, repeated All-Australians and so on. Curiously, the talent was spread almost evenly through the draft, all the way to the likes of Ryan O'Keefe and Cameron Bruce very late in the process.

It also offers a terrific contest for 'best of draft' because the absolute top few players are each completely different with very different credentials. The contenders:

J Brown: 256 games, 594 goals (2.3/games), 2x all-Australian, 3x B&F, 3 premierships, 1 Coleman medal, 7 season captain or co-captain of Brisbane.

C Enright; 332 games, 6x all-Australian, 2x B&F - both in premiership teams, 3 premierships.

M Pavlich: 352 games, 700 goals (2.0/game), 6x B&F, 8 seasons as captain, 6x all-Australian. Played for Fremantle so automatically excused from premiership count.

For me, it is Pavlich, then Enright, then Brown, but the margins aren't large.

Pavlich has it in my opinion because he is only barely shaded by Brown for forward-line performance over his career, despite also grabbing an all-Australian spot at full-back when young (those David Neitz positive vibes hitting me), and being used much more all over the ground to cover for Fremantle being mostly rubbish.

Pavlich was so good, shame he was in WA for his whole career. Probably missed out on a bit of deserved love


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 178 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 329 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies