Jump to content

Why are we continuously being beaten in clearances?

DeeZee
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

Can someone please tell me or offer some sort of explanation as to why we are constantly being beaten at clearances week after week, when we have a Ruck combination of Gawn and Grundy and an on all brigade that consists of Viney ,Trac ,Clarry, and Kozzie etc?

There are better tactical , statistical and analytical guys than me on here, but my guess is that of course we would like to be winning them , but as Goody says in his pressers, our game is based on turnover, and we don’t sweat on who gets it first as we have the cover on the next possession.

Edited by Grapeviney

  • Quote
    • Like 4
     

    Max and Grundys hit outs are not to our players postions a lot of the time and when they get beaten in ruck contests this is even more acute. I think our positioning of mids also needs a reset at centre bounces and stoppages

    Edited by picket fence

  • Quote
    • Like 5

    Teams have gone to work on our clearance game, but our clearance players have prioritised joining in the transition game. It's an interesting dilemma - win the clearances and lose the transition, or win the transition and lose the clearances. We will be busy finding ways to win both. And that's what matters at the business end.

  • Quote
    • Like 11
    • Thanks 1
     

    I posted this in the post game thread, but if you want some different insight watch the press conference….

    Watching Goodwin speak in the presser he was very confident that we could get them on turnover.

    I feel like we are trying to win differently. For years we’ve needed to smash the contested possessions, where as I think now we are often having a look at breaking even there, which means we use our match winners more sparingly. Goodwin spoke about this in the presser. I think it’s about winning games, but not taxing our best players every week, so they are fresher when needed.

  • Quote
    • Like 21
    • Love 1
    4 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

    I posted this in the post game thread, but if you want some different insight watch the press conference….

    Watching Goodwin speak in the presser he was very confident that we could get them on turnover.

    I feel like we are trying to win differently. For years we’ve needed to smash the contested possessions, where as I think now we are often having a look at breaking even there, which means we use our match winners more sparingly. Goodwin spoke about this in the presser. I think it’s about winning games, but not taxing our best players every week, so they are fresher when needed.

     

    The problem with this though is that it allows much quicker delivery into the oppositions forward 50 on a more regular basis.

    The majority of us currently have concerns with how shaky our backline looks and this is a contributing factor.

    Our backline traditionally functions on slow predictable entries allowing us to control and intercept.

    I guess we have to find a balance as the year moves forward.

  • Quote
    • Like 8

    • Author

    When the backlines not performing as well as usual , the strategy can put us under the pump, like yesterday which was too close for comfort and then we had to work harder to save it.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    31 minutes ago, DeeZee said:

    Can someone please tell me or offer some sort of explanation as to why we are constantly being beaten at clearances week after week, when we have a Ruck combination of Gawn and Grundy and an on all brigade that consists of Viney ,Trac ,Clarry, and Kozzie etc?

    There are better tactical , statistical and analytical guys than me on here, but my guess is that of course we would like to be winning them , but as Goody says in his pressers, our game is based on turnover, and we don’t sweat on who gets it first as we have the cover on the next possession.

    Well, ask Yze he's the midfield coach, don't know what happened to the idea that if you are getting beaten you stop the bleeding then transition back to your plan seems you wait till half time to say something, cannot figure that one out. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Focus is post clearance possession. 

  • Quote
    • Like 10
    • Clap 1
     
    27 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

    I feel like we are trying to win differently.

    Yes. There's no point sitting still like we did last year (in my opinion, to pay the faithful from the flag side); we need to come up with variations. Hopefully those variations aren't revealed too early in the year and we have something up our sleeve for the big games at the big end, because good teams will clog our transition, and we'll have to win with our one-wood.

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    • Author

    It’s good to have different strings to our bow and try them now.

    In the last quarter we seemed to shift to a different more traditional mode backing ourselves in with our fitness as well.

    Edited by DeeZee

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    1 hour ago, DeeZee said:

    Can someone please tell me or offer some sort of explanation as to why we are constantly being beaten at clearances week after week, when we have a Ruck combination of Gawn and Grundy and an on all brigade that consists of Viney ,Trac ,Clarry, and Kozzie etc?

    There are better tactical , statistical and analytical guys than me on here, but my guess is that of course we would like to be winning them , but as Goody says in his pressers, our game is based on turnover, and we don’t sweat on who gets it first as we have the cover on the next possession.

    Two things we are waiting for JVR to get big enough to do what Brownie used to do at centre bounces.

    The second is that our players are the most interfered players of all Clubs except one at Pies... Pendlebury

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

    It’s definitely part of a broader strategy to win the ball back post clearance.

    Interesting shift in mindset as the ‘bulls’ we rely on become less important through this stretch of the year.

    Im not convinced Viney would think it’s keeping them fresher, he had some huge body contact on multiple occasions last night

    I know people don’t like talking about the opposition but watching Rowell and Anderson work together was a treat, they are a very good pair. Anderson in particular was everywhere

    Edited by BW511

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    I suspect opposition clubs top priority is winning the clearances against us every week. It’s obvious they put a lot of work in stopping us at the source. Our guys need to realise they being the hunted and not the hunters and step up. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    We are also rotating heavily through the midfield to keep the guns fresh for our final quarter assault. The A team Trac Clarry Vines aren’t starting together in the centre anywhere near as much as last year, so the chemistry isn’t quite there yet with a host of new faces running through there.

    I think it’s the way to go as the team was completely burned out by finals last year

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    1 hour ago, Clintosaurus said:

    Focus is post clearance possession. 

    We actually turn over possession a lot in the centre and at stoppages. We get first hands to the ball and fumble or handball poorly. Not sure why that is happening so much.

    Imagine how much better we would be with better ball handling and disposal.

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    • Thanks 2

    1 hour ago, Beetle said:

    The problem with this though is that it allows much quicker delivery into the oppositions forward 50 on a more regular basis.

    The majority of us currently have concerns with how shaky our backline looks and this is a contributing factor.

    Our backline traditionally functions on slow predictable entries allowing us to control and intercept.

    I guess we have to find a balance as the year moves forward.

    Yeah, I agree. I don’t think we got it right last night, but it was obvious from the presser they had a theory. There’s no way that theory was allowing Anderson to put on a clinic through the midfield though.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    It really always has been about post clearance. High pressure and score on turnover. When we do win clearances and contested ball in the middle it's the ultimate having your cake and eating it too scenario. 

    But gee we came up against a decent midfield performance last night. Best game I've seen Anderson play 

  • Quote
    • Like 9

    I care more about the differential of clean, chest facing clearances. I think we do ok in that.

    Post-clearance possession is basically answering that question of how clean your clearances are when you do get them so how are we going in that stat?

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    Just shows that we are still very much a defensively minded team.

    There’s people who are a lot more qualified than me to decide on strategy but it’s bold to be happy to give up the ball in the hope you win it back.

    Works beautifully if teams kick it in the air to May/Lever/Petty. Not so great when they can find targets 20-30m in front of them

    Edited by BW511

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    We're managing the minutes of our A grade players to keep them fresh throughout the year

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    3 hours ago, picket fence said:

    Max and Grundys hit outs are not to our players postions a lot of the time and when they get beaten in ruck contests this is even more acute. I think our positioning of mids also needs a reset at centre bounces and stoppages

    I think Grundy often finds our players with very accurate tapping. It's what sets him apart. 

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    4 hours ago, Tony Tea said:

    Teams have gone to work on our clearance game, but our clearance players have prioritised joining in the transition game. It's an interesting dilemma - win the clearances and lose the transition, or win the transition and lose the clearances. We will be busy finding ways to win both. And that's what matters at the business end.

    Agree re this, I think we now place more emphasis on transition and winning critical contests. Look at Collingwood last year and they would routinely lose clearance and contested ball but when it mattered they won the contest and were good in transition. There is no point winning a clearance only to turn the ball over or create a stoppage in a position you cannot score.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     

    Doesn’t anyone rate the GV midfield? I’d comfortably have both Rowell and Anderson…

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

      The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 15

      As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

        • Like
      • 287 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Port Adelaide

      Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 3 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Essendon

      Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

        • Clap
      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Gold Coast

      The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

        • Thanks
      • 372 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 33 replies
      Demonland
    View All