Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, KingDingAling said:

I think they are peaking too early.

That would have been a fair thing to say 5 weeks ago. We're coming to the pointy end now and top 2 is in their sights. They're as good a chance as any.

  • Like 2

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, demon3165 said:

 ignore guys running free on the inside.

This also does my head in.
Blokes open running through the middle of the ground but no, ignore them and go down the line to congestion.
Cause, you know .... Defensive option even when attacking.

 

Edited by Fork 'em
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

 

 

3rd qtr 

missed chances 🤮Kozzzzz

ANB horrible turnover!!! 🤮

May - how long  you stupid &$&$$💩

overhandballing !!!!!! Overhandballing!!!!!!💩

kick the goal ffs  🤡🤡

Brown is soft as soft as soft as 💩

Spargo-yes 

Trac kick to pocket rather than goal 🤡🤡

Last qtr: 

NO FWD CRUMBING- kozzzzzzy stay down at back or front 

Kozzy running away from the footy 💩💩💩

Brown is soft all night🤮

Fritsch fumbles costly 🤮

Viney ffs that was stupid umps 🤡elliott goal 

petty push was stupid 🤡 Johnson goal 

brown handballs back into pack 🤡  then ball up then Sidebottom kick to Johnson Pies goal 
 

Goodwin you self obsessed fugazzi … they do a slingshot and we had no one watching the middle

Goodwin- who asked them to be overhandballing all night all night 

dees - 200 kicks 210 handballs 

pies - 200 kicks 105 handballs 

missed chances - had 6 or 7 easy goals missed up to 1/2 time  - Gawns goalkicking!! Salem miss … then laughing (ffs)  . Fritsch !! Trac too nervous to kick a goal  

Edited by spirit of norm smith
O
  • Like 1

Posted

Pies are a good team. Fit, good system 22 contributors.

But we should have been six goals up at half time when we had the opportunities. We hardly fired a shot after half time but a decent buffer could have been insurmountable.

First halves of Langdon, Brayshaw, Salem were great but we need more.

Eight goals from Johnson and Elliot really hurt. 

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Deecisive said:

Agreed, the ball went over the back of the pack to 2 or 3 collingwood players, all of our players were either going for the mark or sitting in front watching the pies run away with it. We need to do something about how clubs switch on us. All night long they switched down the same wing and we failed to cover giving them easy access to their forward 50. we need to work on how we lock down so that we dont allow that easy switch.

Yeah, why do our forwards end up under the ball so much and the other team mops up out back...[censored], still fuming about this.


Posted

They are a good team.  Since 2018 they have gone second, third, sixth, 17th and currently back to second.  Last year was the outlier for them.  We played well enough to beat most teams tonight, but unfortunately not them.  Our defence was poor - possibly bar Salem every defender was beaten.  The lack of intercept marks from May and Lever inside defensive 50 was critical.  They probably got the rub of the green with the holding the ball decisions tonight, but their tackles stick, ours don't.  Jackson played too many minutes in the ruck and that cost us around the ground - being outmarked by Cox resulting in a goal, not competing strongly enough at a boundary throw in where Cameron got it down to De Goey for a snap goal.  Some relatively straightforward misses - Gawn and Salem amongst others.  When the pressure really came in the second half we went handball silly.  Yet I still think we can beat them and do it easily if we get to play them again.

  • Like 4

Posted

Either we don't lock it in the forward line anymore, or we have been figured out a bit.

Games like this make those small forwards like Spargo and Nibbler nearly redundant.

People thinking Tom McDonald is the sole missing thing are dreaming. Tmac didn't exactly play that well for the previous 8 months before being injured. While we are missing what he brings, we should be getting more from our forwards.

Fritsch is Fritsch. Everyone elses spot is up for grabs next year in the forward line in my opinion.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, dee-tox said:

Pies are a good team. Fit, good system 22 contributors.

But we should have been six goals up at half time when we had the opportunities. We hardly fired a shot after half time but a decent buffer could have been insurmountable.

First halves of Langdon, Brayshaw, Salem were great but we need more.

Eight goals from Johnson and Elliot really hurt. 

Early in the third we were all over them but didn't impact the scoreboard, they scored and that was it...the game changed from there.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Right in front of us... Flat out throw

Umpire Findlay put whistle to mouth but decided not to blow... ffs 

Blatant 

Yeah, blatant throw.
But the umpiring is so bad these days I don't even get annoyed anymore.
Just part of the game these days.

All swings and roundabouts.
Win some, lose some yadda, yadda, yadda .....

  • Like 3
  • Shocked 1
  • Angry 1
Posted

I am sitting here thinking we should have won that but at the same time going our forward line is was a mess, just about everyone in the backline were poor and all bar Oliver went missing in the midfield after halftime. 
 

Collingwood are playing bloody good football and are one of the two teams I don’t feel confident about beating, Sydney being the other. 

  • Like 3
Posted
15 minutes ago, Deemania since 56 said:

He's a great Captain. He's got to work harder on his shots at goal - particularly the high drop and the swing foot. Jackson could have done more around the ground, particularly pick-ups, not taps into further troubles.

No he has back to his old ways, he started kicking straight over the mark for those 30mtr goals, now he is back to kicking on an arc again, which will bring you kicking action out to in that's the problem, track does it as well.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Posted

What i would like to see is our forwards actually work together when someone is kicking the ball into the forward 50 we have 3 or 4 players who can mark who all should be leading in different directions instead of all standing still. other players should be helping to run interference or clear areas so that our forwards have space to run into, or they drag their players away from the contest to give our forwards a better chance of marking. instead we kick it deep into a forward pocket, i still dont understand why you dont go to the front of the goal square or have players leading up. need to work together to give the kicker options to go to.  We have a massive number of inside 50's but our crumbing forwards did bugger all, one goal was the best we got out of any of them, which is not great considering the number chances they had.

  • Like 3
Posted
19 minutes ago, adonski said:

OUT: Goodwin

Is this the right thread?

Ridiculous. It wasn't Goody's fault the players couldn't kick straight to save themselves and Collingwood couldn't miss.

15 minutes ago, layzie said:

Premiership is firmly on Collingwood's sights now. Top 2 very much on the agenda, pretend all you want. This is happening 

Let's not get carried away. Melbourne should've been 8 goals in front at half-time and the game would have been over. Colingwood won by 7 points despite losing every category except the final score and the umpiring. They played brilliantly in the 2nd half but it should've been too late by then.

12 minutes ago, D4Life said:

Should have been six in front at half time

Hard for Demons to get a free second half

Pies probably got 6 or 7 goals from frees

the last to Johnson unbelievably soft

Agree. When it mattered all the decisions went Collingwood's way. Petracca gets a holding the ball decision when he handpassed it. A Collingwwood players lies all over the ball and gets a minute to tap it out. I don't want to blame the umpires for the loss but in a close game it matters.

10 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Lingers, next time say nothing 

In retrospect it wasn't wise. But it was ridiculous at the start of the game Collingwood try to drive his head into the ground and then 4 players  come in to join the tackle after Lingers had been brought to the ground. Naturally the umpire calls for a ball-up.

8 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

Getting overrun something shocking

Well, it was 4 goals to 2 in the last. With a bit of luck we could have won.  Let's be honest here. Collingwood have won 11 in a row and with just ordinary luck for each team it would be at best 8-3.

6 minutes ago, DemonWA said:

That one stung. 

Pies made the most of their chances. Felt like a final and we came up short.  Few players looking tired and sore. 

We don't quite have the spark we had last year but we'll be around the mark. 

All of the part time supporters throwing the toys out of the cot and saying their over the team can gtfo. 

Buckle up. Get behind the boys. 

Well said DemonWA. We won the Inside 50s 65-41 plus nearly every stat apart from the only one that counts. It's frustrating to lose an unlosable game but to all the posters who have decided to vent their spleen just get over yourselves. Collingwood played as well as they possibly could, beat us by 7 points, and Melbourne should have won by 6 goals. It wasn't a disgraceful effort by the Dees. We lost by a narrow margin to a hard-tackling, attacking & extremely lucky opponent.

  • Like 10
Posted
10 minutes ago, BAMF said:

Unfortunately all of Elliotts free kicks were there in my opinion

 it was infuriating as we probably should have had a free kick moments before the first one where he pinged Hibberd.

Viney needed to put that on the boot as soon as he got it. He had a tiny moment and might have been a little bit stiff but those get paid all the time 

 

Yep and the one he got in the 2nd came after Collingwood did fend off got caught in goalsquare, should have been holding the ball.

instead ball up and Elliot got free - goal!

  • Like 3
  • Angry 1

Posted
Just now, Deecisive said:

What i would like to see is our forwards actually work together when someone is kicking the ball into the forward 50 we have 3 or 4 players who can mark who all should be leading in different directions instead of all standing still. other players should be helping to run interference or clear areas so that our forwards have space to run into, or they drag their players away from the contest to give our forwards a better chance of marking. instead we kick it deep into a forward pocket, i still dont understand why you dont go to the front of the goal square or have players leading up. need to work together to give the kicker options to go to.  We have a massive number of inside 50's but our crumbing forwards did bugger all, one goal was the best we got out of any of them, which is not great considering the number chances they had.

That's the game style that they played last year, we have been worked out by the opposition, they don't even bother to look inside first thought pockets.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Docs Demons said:

Felt sorry for Viney there. Hibberd just didn't want the pill and hand balled it to him from about 2 feet away. In other words he [censored] himself and just wanted someone else to take the heat.

Yep. Viney had to play the game though and slam it on the boot. It would have been a wild kick and probably would have landed in a Collingwood players lap.

It was more Hibberds free kick than anyone else's.

Viney maybe a bit stiff though. There are a few like that each way every game though.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Deecisive said:

What i would like to see is our forwards actually work together when someone is kicking the ball into the forward 50 we have 3 or 4 players who can mark who all should be leading in different directions instead of all standing still. other players should be helping to run interference or clear areas so that our forwards have space to run into, or they drag their players away from the contest to give our forwards a better chance of marking. instead we kick it deep into a forward pocket, i still dont understand why you dont go to the front of the goal square or have players leading up. need to work together to give the kicker options to go to.  We have a massive number of inside 50's but our crumbing forwards did bugger all, one goal was the best we got out of any of them, which is not great considering the number chances they had.

Think

we only play from the defensive pocket

Ask the coach

Posted
7 minutes ago, Return to Glory said:

Good thing this isn't a forum

Nice little jokette there buster!

If you want to rebut then fine I'll discuss. Let's see if you can bring something to the table other than a drive by.

Posted

Missed opportunities inside 50, so many entries wasteful entries, almost doubled there clearances, Filth tackled well and took all there opportunities.

65 forward 50 entries to 41 there conversion rate was insane.

Should not be losing games of footy with these statistics.

Our own worst enemies.

  • Like 6

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    2024 Player Reviews: #7 Jack Viney

    The tough on baller won his second Keith 'Bluey' Truscott Trophy in a narrow battle with skipper Max Gawn and Alex Neal-Bullen and battled on manfully in the face of a number of injury niggles. Date of Birth: 13 April 1994 Height: 178cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 219 Goals MFC 2024: 10 Career Total: 66 Brownlow Medal Votes: 8

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 3

    TRAINING: Wednesday 13th November 2024

    A couple of Demonland Trackwatchers braved the rain and headed down to Gosch's paddock to bring you their observations from the second day of Preseason training for the 1st to 4th Year players. DITCHA'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS I attended some of the training today. Richo spoke to me and said not to believe what is in the media, as we will good this year. Jefferson and Kentfield looked big and strong.  Petty was doing all the training. Adams looked like he was in rehab.  KE

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    2024 Player Reviews: #15 Ed Langdon

    The Demon running machine came back with a vengeance after a leaner than usual year in 2023.  Date of Birth: 1 February 1996 Height: 182cm Games MFC 2024: 22 Career Total: 179 Goals MFC 2024: 9 Career Total: 76 Brownlow Medal Votes: 5 Melbourne Football Club: 5th Best & Fairest: 352 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #24 Trent Rivers

    The premiership defender had his best year yet as he was given the opportunity to move into the midfield and made a good fist of it. Date of Birth: 30 July 2001 Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 100 Goals MFC 2024: 2 Career Total:  9 Brownlow Medal Votes: 7 Melbourne Football Club: 6th Best & Fairest: 350 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 2

    TRAINING: Monday 11th November 2024

    Veteran Demonland Trackwatchers Kev Martin, Slartibartfast & Demon Wheels were on hand at Gosch's Paddock to kick off the official first training session for the 1st to 4th year players with a few elder statesmen in attendance as well. KEV MARTIN'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Beautiful morning. Joy all round, they look like they want to be there.  21 in the squad. Looks like the leadership group is TMac, Viney Chandler and Petty. They look like they have sli

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports 2

    2024 Player Reviews: #1 Steven May

    The years are rolling by but May continued to be rock solid in a key defensive position despite some injury concerns. He showed great resilience in coming back from a nasty rib injury and is expected to continue in that role for another couple of seasons. Date of Birth: 10 January 1992 Height: 193cm Games MFC 2024: 19 Career Total: 235 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 24 Melbourne Football Club: 9th Best & Fairest: 316 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 2

    2024 Player Reviews: #4 Judd McVee

    It was another strong season from McVee who spent most of his time mainly at half back but he also looked at home on a few occasions when he was moved into the midfield. There could be more of that in 2025. Date of Birth: 7 August 2003 Height: 185cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 48 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 1 Brownlow Medal Votes: 1 Melbourne Football Club: 7th Best & Fairest: 347 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #31 Bayley Fritsch

    Once again the club’s top goal scorer but he had a few uncharacteristic flat spots during the season and the club will be looking for much better from him in 2025. Date of Birth: 6 December 1996 Height: 188cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 149 Goals MFC 2024: 41 Career Total: 252 Brownlow Medal Votes: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 9

    2024 Player Reviews: #18 Jake Melksham

    After sustaining a torn ACL in the final match of the 2023 season Jake added a bit to the attack late in the 2024 season upon his return. He has re-signed on to the Demons for 1 more season in 2025. Date of Birth: 12 August 1991 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 229 Goals MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 188

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 7
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...