Jump to content

Featured Replies

If the selected 18 is fixed, then I don’t believe TMac will play in the forward line - as per Goodies press conference today where he stated he would not play 3 talls on the forward line. I think TMac will play as the 7th backman.

If the selected 18 is not fixed then I think TMac will be dropped and Tomlinson will come in as the 7th back.

Edited by Neil Crompton

 
28 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Only way I see the 3 amigos playing is that Luke Jackson may be a late out potentially?

Why Dazzle??

21 minutes ago, DEE fence said:

Dunstan for Viney, Gus to stick to Salems role, Smith for Lever. 

 

Agree. Dunstan's last game against Richmond saw him get three Brownlow votes!

 

I suspect Tom Sparrow will be chomping at the bit to take the opportunity to fill Jack Vineys role. 

34 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Only way I see the 3 amigos playing is that Luke Jackson may be a late out potentially?

Have you heard anything or is this pure (or rather impure) speculation?  


2 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Have you heard anything or is this pure (or rather impure) speculation?  

Speco

3 minutes ago, monoccular said:

I suspect Tom Sparrow will be chomping at the bit to take the opportunity to fill Jack Vineys role. 

I am hoping that the selectors use either Gus or JJ to fill Vineys role, and not Dunstan. Both deserve that chance on form alone well before Dunstan IMO.

 
2 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

Interesting that they have Brown replacing Viney thought Dunstan would get a go. Brown should be in the VFL we are now too tall.

Why would Brown be in the VFL? He’s our best forward by a long bloody way. He was one of the main reasons we broke our drought last year.

 

Tmac and Weid can fight it out for the second spot in the forward line as they’ve both been underwhelming.

Well if we can't work out what the side will look like then good luck in Richmond trying to. I guess we'll all know by the time the VFL game starts. The Tiges haven't been any better than us at centre bounce clearances so Viney being out might hurt less this week than others. 

 


It may be that they adjust the bench to always include a tall. That way you probably don't need to see Brown, Weeds and TMac in the forward line together. TMac could really have to swing on Sunday night, potentially giving a chop out in the back line, forward line and even ruck.

Goodwin said in his presser that all 3 won't play in the forward line so obviously Brown and Weid will play forward. Does that suddenly make our backline too tall? I suppose Smith can play small. May on Riewoldt, Petty on Lynch and McDonald on Balta. Brayshaw may spend more time in the guts leaving Bowey, Rivers, Hunt and Smith as the 7 backman. I can live with that.

Good squad named. Gives us plenty of options, flexibility and direction and does not give anything away to the opposition. So many different ways we could set up.

 

 Love it!

 

9 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

Goodwin said in his presser that all 3 won't play in the forward line so obviously Brown and Weid will play forward. Does that suddenly make our backline too tall? I suppose Smith can play small. May on Riewoldt, Petty on Lynch and McDonald on Balta. Brayshaw may spend more time in the guts leaving Bowey, Rivers, Hunt and Smith as the 7 backman. I can live with that.

You've summed it up well. When Salem ( mid small) got injured in round 1, McDonald (a tall) was moved back to cover.  I reckon they count Smith as a hybrid so he in effect becomes the fourth small.  McDonald, May and Petty give us our preferred structure and Brayshaw takes Viney's place in the midfield rotations.  

4 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

You would think Dunstan for Viney, but then I look at the interchange and you can’t drop Harmes, Jackson, Sparrow or JJ 

 

There are two different starting teams named. One on the MFC website and one on the AFL website. Going by both teams, it's Smith for Lever and Brown for Viney. Sparrow, JJ, Harmes and potentially even Brayshaw will pick up Viney's minutes. I'd say JJ will get more minutes as Sparrow has quite high midfield minutes anyway. 


9 minutes ago, A F said:

There are two different starting teams named. One on the MFC website and one on the AFL website. Going by both teams, it's Smith for Lever and Brown for Viney. Sparrow, JJ, Harmes and potentially even Brayshaw will pick up Viney's minutes. I'd say JJ will get more minutes as Sparrow has quite high midfield minutes anyway. 

I can't see us going in with Brown, Weid and Tommy 'A F'...it's just not going (shouldn't) to happen.

No matter what the teams show.

2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Yeah I'm confused with these selections.

I would have thought McDonald goes back, but then they have already named Smith as well. To see Weid, McDonald and Brown all named in the one forward line after Goody comes out publicly and says this is not even an option is head scratching. 

I honestly have no idea why Melksham is even a consideration. He is well past it and has been for 2 years now. He should be at the stage now where he's only named if we have significant injury list. I seriously he's an emergency and that's it.

I agree with some. I don't think Dunstan will play. They'll bring in the extra runner perhaps in Bedford. If Dunstan could get a gig out with Viney out then makes you wonder if he'll even play at all this year. Like for like swap you'd think.

 

Dunstan was recruited to cover for Viney when he was injured. 
Perfect time to bring in another hard player. Step up. 
cometh the moment 

seize the day

Definitely a welcome selection "headache" with who to choose amongst Sam Weideman, Ben Brown and Tom McDonald.

I would think choosing Ben Brown and Tom McDonald is a no brainer as a more potent forward line.

I am still unconvinced by Sam Weideman. But I am willing to give him a few more chances nevertheless. He just has to impact games and show more consistency!

Losing Jack Viney and Jake Lever are unforeseen blows due to COVID-19. But hopefully Luke Dunstan and Adam Tomlinson (or Joel Smith) can cover them.

 

Will certainly be curious to see how Luke Dunstan performs for the Demons. His disposal and decision-making has been poor from memory of his time at the Saints. Let's hope Mark "Choco" Williams' precision kicking magic has rubbed off on him!

 

1 hour ago, Swooper1987 said:

You've summed it up well. When Salem ( mid small) got injured in round 1, McDonald (a tall) was moved back to cover.  I reckon they count Smith as a hybrid so he in effect becomes the fourth small.  McDonald, May and Petty give us our preferred structure and Brayshaw takes Viney's place in the midfield rotations.  

I agree re Brayshaw taking Viney's place. As for the rest of the final line up, well I reckon the Team as announced, including the Emergencies is just a toss up to confuse all.


I think J Smith comes in and will take one of Riewoldt or Lynch which will free up Petty to take on Levers role. He is just ahead of Tommo based on athleticism but Tommo is definitely an alternative option. 

TMac could move into the wing which will allow JJ to rotate through the middle and cover Viney leaving Weid and BBB in the forward line.

But I think the more likely scenario is Dunstan in for Viney as a straight swap and TMac/Weid for BBB. 

Can we stop saying T Mac to the wing?? He has lost any agility he had. Average field kick etc. 

he plays key fwd or back or at Casey

42 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Can we stop saying T Mac to the wing?? He has lost any agility he had. Average field kick etc. 

he plays key fwd or back or at Casey

Agree, would be like the Titanic turning in a bathtub! 

 
7 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Weid named in the starting 18. 

So is Smith 

I totally agree that Brayshaw has all the tools to take Viney's place, but disagree (politely) with everyone that he should. Salem's QB role and he is a defender not not a mid, is really crucial, that is why Brayshaw should stay defensive and not go into the middle. Of everyone named Gus is the best to fill in the Salem role. Smith can be a poor man's Lever, and it is a fair time for Dunstan to come in and rotate with Sparrow. I want our defence as stable as possible so with Lever out, keep Gus down back for now.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 222 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Love
      • Thanks
    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

    • 255 replies