Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, Lord Travis said:

He is performing.Ā Heā€™s averagingĀ 5 goals a game and was performing better than Ben Brown at the same level, yet Brown was promoted ahead of him. Brown had less goals, less marks, less tackles - promoted ahead of him.

Weid has right to feel hard done by as heā€™s performing betterĀ than those around him, yet not getting the same opportunities at the next level. If I was him Iā€™d be leaving. Why be loyal to a workplace that isnā€™t loyal to you? Why put in the work and outperform others, only to watch them promoted unjustly ahead of you?

We need to keep improvingĀ our culture and reward those performing well, not those with a bigger name or reputation.Ā 

Big difference between the Melbourne Side and Casey.Ā 
The Weid has played many AFL games and not performed.Ā 
he has to be more consistentĀ 

I am sure he knows that. But Ben Brown has been been a consistent AFL performer, who will takeĀ a little time to get his Rythm sorted

I want the Weid to stay. But his AFL performance needs to improve in consistencyĀ 

Ā 
4 minutes ago, Jaded said:

The reason is because Tmac has been trash for 3 years and we needed a big mature body to help out Weideman.Ā 
Make no mistake, the club planned to have Ben Brown and Weideman as our two key position forwards in 2021. Injuries and the unexpected form of Tmac have thrown those plans into disarray.Ā 

Exactly. The plan was Weid and Brown as our two big forwards.

Some people seem to forget we shopped Mcdonald all trade period and there were no takers.

Edited by Pickett2Jackson

3 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

He is performing.Ā Heā€™s averagingĀ 5 goals a game and was performing better than Ben Brown at the same level, yet Brown was promoted ahead of him. Brown had less goals, less marks, less tackles - promoted ahead of him.

Weid has right to feel hard done by as heā€™s performing betterĀ than those around him, yet not getting the same opportunities at the next level. If I was him Iā€™d be leaving. Why be loyal to a workplace that isnā€™t loyal to you? Why put in the work and outperform others, only to watch them promoted unjustly ahead of you?

We need to keep improvingĀ our culture and reward those performing well, not those with a bigger name or reputation.Ā 

If Brown plays poorly for the next game or two we can and should expect him to play at CaseyĀ 
Ā 

 

Mark Williams is very excited by what he sees in Weideman.

I'm happy enough to settle on this for now.

9 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Mark Williams is very excited by what he sees in Weideman.

I'm happy enough to settle on this for now.

That is an excellent positiveĀ 

15 games + FinalsĀ 

Ā 


19 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Mark Williams is very excited by what he sees in Weideman.

I'm happy enough to settle on this for now.

He said he reminded him of young Warren Tredrea.Ā  I bet Choco cant wait to get Weid into the seniors.

Even with the new rules providing some reliefĀ it's really hard to be an unathletic key forward.

We already had 2, and for some reason decided to add a 3rd.Ā 

There's some hope with Tom McDonald recapturing his leap and ability to find space on the lead, but he still can't turn or change direction quickly.

Jackson and Fritsch don't really provide any solutions because Fritsch is still meh defensively (if somewhat improved) and Jackson does his best work up the ground as a forward or in the ruck. More ruck minutes for Jackson = more Gawn forward = another even less mobile tall forward target.

The best combination with Jackson and FritschĀ is just 1 genuine tall in a CHF role. That's what Tom's provided and why it has worked well. Can Tom keep it up? Who knows. But he's more likely to do so when given more responsibility in that role than trying to share it. Can Brown do the same job - yes, although he has to embrace doing more dirty work and realise he's not the 60 goal full forward. Can Weid do it? Well, maybe if his tank is at full capacity, and he did it last year before he ran out of juice late.

Brown, Weideman, Jackson, Fritsch. It just isn't going to work. The quicker we stop pretending the better for everyone.

I've maintained all along that Brown will cost us Weid, and maybe that's ok and we just accept it.Ā Brown could be the better player for the next couple of years and Weid could maintain his level of just marginal AFL talent. So it might be the opportunity to actually find a long term replacement.

7 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Even with the new rules providing some reliefĀ it's really hard to be an unathletic key forward.

We already had 2, and for some reason decided to add a 3rd.Ā 

There's some hope with Tom McDonald recapturing his leap and ability to find space on the lead, but he still can't turn or change direction quickly.

Jackson and Fritsch don't really provide any solutions because Fritsch is still meh defensively (if somewhat improved) and Jackson does his best work up the ground as a forward or in the ruck. More ruck minutes for Jackson = more Gawn forward = another even less mobile tall forward target.

The best combination with Jackson and FritschĀ is just 1 genuine tall in a CHF role. That's what Tom's provided and why it has worked well. Can Tom keep it up? Who knows. But he's more likely to do so when given more responsibility in that role than trying to share it. Can Brown do the same job - yes, although he has to embrace doing more dirty work and realise he's not the 60 goal full forward. Can Weid do it? Well, maybe if his tank is at full capacity, and he did it last year before he ran out of juice late.

Brown, Weideman, Jackson, Fritsch. It just isn't going to work. The quicker we stop pretending the better for everyone.

I've maintained all along that Brown will cost us Weid, and maybe that's ok and we just accept it.Ā Brown could be the better player for the next couple of years and Weid could maintain his level of just marginal AFL talent. So it might be the opportunity to actually find a long term replacemen

Edited by joeboy

Ā 
3 hours ago, Dr.D said:

I'm sorry but if I'm Weideman hearing that I'd be saying; "'I've kicked 14 goals in 3 weeks, including a bag of 7, don't talk to me about earning my position! Especially when Ben Brown gotĀ promoted on lesser form. TalkĀ about patience, how about you put me in the team and one of the other players can be patient!". These would all be reasonable points from his perspective.Ā 

There's a reason Casey's percentage is 269

2 hours ago, adonski said:

Theyā€™ll move on T Mac at seasons end, they find it difficult to trust him given heā€™s been [censored] house two years straight, even if he has found form this yearĀ 

What if his good form continues for the whole year?


3 hours ago, Redleg said:

Weid IMO applies more pressure than Melksham, is taller, probably quicker, can play key forward or forward pocket and flank, is younger and more vital to our future and has already starred in a final for us.

I don't want Weid lost to the club.Ā 

TBH if it came a choice between Weid and BB, I would go for Weid.

If he doesn't get games, I fear he will be lost to us.

I don;t want to lose the Weid either.

Everyone was excited preseason at the prospect of the BB and the Weid in tandem. they both got injured so those plans were scuppered for the time being but i see no reason why they can't play together yet. A lot of people suddenly doubting BB on the basis of his first game back. He's obviously rusty but he did have the North defenders climbing all over him. The season is long so i'm sure both BB and the Weid will contribute plenty yet. Talk of trading the Weid or BB not making it areĀ very premature.Ā 

21 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Brown, Weideman, Jackson, Fritsch. It just isn't going to work. The quicker we stop pretending the better for everyone.

I'm with you on not playing 3 talls in the forward line. However, I see Jackson as a very tall midfielder who can ruck AND go forward if needs be - so he can be in the same side, but not necessarily as part of 3 talls in the forward line all at the same time. I would like to see more pace/ground-ball pressure, the likes of Bedford/Chandler vying withĀ ANB/Melksham for a spot.

Ā 

SpargoĀ  Ā  WeidemanĀ  Ā Bedford/Chandler

PickettĀ  Ā  B.BrownĀ  Ā  Ā  Ā  Fritsch

Edited by TRIGON

2 hours ago, adonski said:

Theyā€™ll move on T Mac at seasons end, they find it difficult to trust him given heā€™s been [censored] house two years straight, even if he has found form this yearĀ 

What's the point? 29 year-olds, even good ones, haveĀ close to zero trade value. If he maintains his current form throughout the year, we might get a late third round pick for him. He'sĀ worth more to us than that.

Making players kick the door down isĀ well and good, but the problem is that Weideman seems to need to prove himself for Casey far more than the Melksham's of this world. It took until round 6 before he could get a game last year despite a string of good games in the 2's. Same thing is happening this year. I wouldn't blame him if he was getting frustrated.

There's a reasonĀ clubs value talls so highly - good ones are damn hard to find.Ā Weideman has shown plenty to suggest he'll be a damn good full forward for the next 8 years. Our side will be better with him in it - find a way to get him in.Ā 

Right now Weideman would be better than Brown, but I understand the call.

It's easy to forget that Weideman will start playing his best footy in 2-3 years when he hits 26.

I'd rather lose Brown or McDonald than Weideman.

1 hour ago, loges said:

What if his good form continues for the whole year?

then we get good currency for a trade rather than getting nothing


24 minutes ago, Accepting Mediocrity said:

What's the point? 29 year-olds, even good ones, haveĀ close to zero trade value. If he maintains his current form throughout the year, we might get a late third round pick for him. He'sĀ worth more to us than that.

TMac also has to be considered in this, he probably feels he could give another 2 good years at AFL level at another club, why would he be content playing in the reserves as a back up.Ā 

12 hours ago, Fanatique Demon said:

How do I say this nicely? Talent aside,Ā Iā€™d be concerned whetherĀ De Goey has the right temperament for us.Ā 

He looks like Brett Bogan of the Fluffy Dice, but if you hear him speakĀ he's a sweet well-mannered bloke.

8 minutes ago, Grr-owl said:

He looks like Brett Bogan of the Fluffy Dice, but if you hear him speakĀ he's a sweet well-mannered bloke.

i doubt degoey will ever reach his potential on or off the field

While we're discussing things Collingwood, list manager Ned Guy has apparently resigned (pushed/sacked?).

I wonder if the Pies will pay 75% of his salary at his next job.

37 minutes ago, demonstone said:

While we're discussing things Collingwood, list manager Ned Guy has apparently resigned (pushed/sacked?).

I wonder if the Pies will pay 75% of his salary at his next job.

Doubt he was pushed as he resigned at the end of last year but was asked to stay on and they tried to talk him out of leaving.Ā  list-manager-ned-guy-quits

It reads more like he got a bit fed up with the board making key list decisions, in particular Board pressure for Beams' return and pressure to give 7 years to Grundy, two of the main reasons they got into the sal cap mess.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


9 minutes ago, Winter Dan said:

Can we trade BBB end of year?Ā 

Yeah, with his consent.

But we are not that idiotic.

If you want to keep Weid - move TMac to a wing and if it doesnā€™t work - to Casey.Ā 

Ā 
4 hours ago, Lord Travis said:

He is performing.Ā Heā€™s averagingĀ 5 goals a game and was performing better than Ben Brown at the same level, yet Brown was promoted ahead of him. Brown had less goals, less marks, less tackles - promoted ahead of him.

Weid has right to feel hard done by as heā€™s performing betterĀ than those around him, yet not getting the same opportunities at the next level. If I was him Iā€™d be leaving. Why be loyal to a workplace that isnā€™t loyal to you? Why put in the work and outperform others, only to watch them promoted unjustly ahead of you?

We need to keep improvingĀ our culture and reward those performing well, not those with a bigger name or reputation.Ā 

BB played less gametime (around one-third) in the VFL Casey team due to recovery from injury and time-proven resting strategies to ensure a fast heal from that which ailed him.

Alongside this recuperation, the intensity of his game was naturally restricted to prevent a set-back in his AFL preparation. One must expect, under these circumstances in operation at the time, that Brown's contribution was restricted and could not be reasonably compared to that of another forward with so much additional gametime and intent, without a potentially limiting need to take care with a recuperation injury, without a limit placed on joint exertion and dynamics.Ā 

As it is in the present moment, it was time that Weed began producing some form in the VFL team. He has had five years to achieve consistency and improved performance upon which the team and supporters could rely.

Ā 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Essendon

    What were they thinking?Ā I mean by ā€œtheyā€ the coaching panel and team selectors who chose the team to play against an opponent who, like Melbourne, had made a poor start to the season and who they appeared perfectly capable of beating in what was possibly the last chance to turn the season around.Itā€™s no secret that the Demonsā€™ forward line is totally dysfunctional, having opened the season barely able to average sixty points per game which means there has been no semblance of any system from the team going forward into attack.Ā Nevertheless, on Saturday night at the Adelaide Oval in one of the Gather Round showcase games, Melbourne, with Max Gawn dominating the hit outs against a depleted Essendon ruck resulting from Nick Bryanā€™s early exit, finished just ahead in clearances won and found itself inside the 50 metre arc 51 times to 43. The end result was a final score that had the Bombers winningĀ 15.6 (96) to 8.9 (57). On balance, one could expect this to result in a two or three goal win, but in this case, it translated into a six and a half goal defeat because they only managed to convert eight times or 11.68% of their entries. The Bombers more than doubled that. On Thursday night at the same ground, the losing team Adelaide managed to score 100 points from almost the same number of times inside 50.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 33 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 107 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 24 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Vomit
      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 264 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    Itā€™s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland