TeamPlayedFine39 8,525 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 Genuinely shocked that he got the three weeks. Personally, I think three weeks is a bit much, but I also believe that it would be given to any other player in the league if they did the same thing. Shocked the ‘good bloke’ loophole didn’t work this time. 1 Quote
DubDee 26,669 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 How long until Geelong appeal? id give it 30 minutes Quote
Clintosaurus 7,953 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 2 minutes ago, DubDee said: How long until Geelong appeal? id give it 30 minutes Not sure they can given the guilty plea. 1 Quote
Demonland 74,340 Posted March 23, 2021 Author Posted March 23, 2021 Surely he appeals and it gets downgraded to 2. Quote
BDA 23,048 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 (edited) Justice done. It was the only possible outcome based on the facts. Severe impact = 3 games. Edited March 23, 2021 by Better days ahead Quote
Dee Zephyr 19,311 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 Danger just said on 7 sport they won’t be appealing. 1 Quote
Jaded No More 68,976 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 Me reading the news tonight... well done to the AFL for finally not letting a big name off 1 2 Quote
Demonstone 23,549 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 Three weeks is his right whack, I reckon. I wonder if this forum would have been paying such close attention to this matter if we weren't playing Geelong in three weeks time! 1 2 Quote
Pates 9,697 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 Actually quite surprised the tribunal came down with 3 weeks. I think it’s right because he chose to bump, he didn’t have to engage in that contact so the moment the player came away with a concussion and broken nose he should’ve always been in trouble. But to see them actually do it to a star player is refreshing. Makes Geelong’s start to the year a lot tougher, love it! Quote
dee-tox 4,835 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 Fair decision. He sprinted/charged at Kelly with a view to taking him out. For once tribunal has it right. 2 Quote
daisycutter 30,004 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 SIRI got it wrong - WTF is going on with this tribunal.......can expect a huge condemnation letter from apple 2 Quote
Dr. Gonzo 24,468 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 (edited) 21 hours ago, DeeSpencer said: He had no option to tackle - the ball was gone. And no option to smother - the video shrinks distance down, he wasn't realistically going to smother a handball. Nor did he have 10 steps to decide what to do. He's corralling and protecting the corridor, likely thinking a tackle is the option until Kelly goes to handball, in which case at the last minute he bumps to stop Kelly's run. It's a late bump that's unfortunate and shouldn't have been so forceful. If you're going to check a guys run you can do that just by blocking the space in front of them. He bumped and it went wrong, that's about all that the video shows. There doesn't need to be extra sinister motivations added to it. If he had no option to tackle or smother then he was late and shouldn't have even laid a bump. He could have avoided contact altogether unlike the Viney/Lynch incident several years ago Edited March 23, 2021 by Dr. Gonzo 1 Quote
Dr. Gonzo 24,468 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 9 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said: Sloane, another Dangerfield great mate but also Kelly's captain is saying Kelly "... ran into a guy with a rock-hard melon. I've ran into that bloke, Danger, a couple of times and you certainly do come off second best normally." I wouldn't be too happy if my captain said it was my fault after the injuries I sustained. It is salt into the wound after Ricutto yesterday said it was 'bad luck'. Isn't Kelly's father Craig Kelly, a senior AFL Player Manager. I wounder if we will hear from him. tbh I find it quite unsavoury that Ricutto and Sloane are batting for a mate rather than one of their own kids. imv if they can't support Kelly they should keep quiet and stay out of it. Interesting that Adelaide didn't have the same forgiving nature when Trengove got done for tackling Dangerfield or ANB last year. They were quick to whip out the medical reports on those occasions. 2 Quote
DubDee 26,669 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 If this was Kozzi or Clarry getting three I’d be ropable but it’s not so I can live with it ? Quote
Forest Demon 4,681 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 Tough [censored] Danger. Catch ya in Round 20 or whenever we play Geelong next. Unlikely, but fingers crossed dads army has bombed out of finals contention by then. Quote
DeeSpencer 26,667 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 Well I'm with Danger's lawyer, the Oxford and Macquarie dictionaries and Siri on agreeing this wasn't the definition of severe. I would've graded it as high. But the AFL are scared stiff on concussions right now so severe it is. Actually credit to Danger and his lawyer that they gave up the silly self defence angle. 1 Quote
In Harmes Way 7,869 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 29 minutes ago, daisycutter said: SIRI got it wrong - WTF is going on with this tribunal.......can expect a huge condemnation letter from apple They’ll definitely be giving Alexa a crack next time Quote
Ethan Tremblay 31,388 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 (edited) Did Dangerfield blame the longer quarters? Edited March 23, 2021 by Ethan Tremblay 3 Quote
Dr. Gonzo 24,468 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 1 hour ago, Pickett2Jackson said: See you on the MCG in round 4 Dangerflog Oh wait.... no we won't! hahahaha [censored] 1 Quote
whatwhat say what 23,836 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 11 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said: Well I'm with Danger's lawyer, the Oxford and Macquarie dictionaries and Siri on agreeing this wasn't the definition of severe. I would've graded it as high. But the AFL are scared stiff on concussions right now so severe it is. Actually credit to Danger and his lawyer that they gave up the silly self defence angle. they've set the precedent with anb and one other player - concussion = severe 2 Quote
Sir Why You Little 37,450 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 18 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said: Well I'm with Danger's lawyer, the Oxford and Macquarie dictionaries and Siri on agreeing this wasn't the definition of severe. I would've graded it as high. But the AFL are scared stiff on concussions right now so severe it is. Actually credit to Danger and his lawyer that they gave up the silly self defence angle. Concussion is severe Kelly was out cold 1 Quote
John Crow Batty 8,892 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 The concussion elephant has grown too big in the room and leaves no room for star players to wriggle their way out anymore. 3 Quote
picket fence 18,169 Posted March 23, 2021 Posted March 23, 2021 Should have got 5 weeks. The view from the other video shown longtitudinally displays a more pronounced picture! and it is more damning. I reckon Geelong and player might think they got of lightly! 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.