Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

I assume most will have recieved this    but this bit was most interesting

 

  1. OUR FACILITIES • Finish construction of high-performance facility at Casey Fields • Start construction of new Melbourne home base facility
    We have finished the construction of our high-performance facility at Casey Fields, including a recent $8 million upgrade of the AFL and AFLW facility, which has been timely given the impact of COVID-19 and training at a shared facility in AAMI Park.
  • Currently our football program is based at AAMI Park, while our administration is based at several points within the MCG.
  • Our vision is to bring together the entire club for the first time in recent history, based within the MCG local precinct.
  • This means the football program, administration and social club are all in the one hub.
  • We need to provide our men’s and women’s teams with the same elite training facilities that every other AFL club currently enjoys.
  • We need to create a Members Social Club within walking distance of the MCG.  
  • For the first time, the State Government are funding a feasibility project involving State Government, the AFL and MFC to explore all possible options within the inner-city MCG local precinct.

 

Now I will go back and read it all. 

 
2 minutes ago, 640MD said:

I assume most will have recieved this    but this bit was most interesting

 

  1. OUR FACILITIES • Finish construction of high-performance facility at Casey Fields • Start construction of new Melbourne home base facility
    We have finished the construction of our high-performance facility at Casey Fields, including a recent $8 million upgrade of the AFL and AFLW facility, which has been timely given the impact of COVID-19 and training at a shared facility in AAMI Park.
  • Currently our football program is based at AAMI Park, while our administration is based at several points within the MCG.
  • Our vision is to bring together the entire club for the first time in recent history, based within the MCG local precinct.
  • This means the football program, administration and social club are all in the one hub.
  • We need to provide our men’s and women’s teams with the same elite training facilities that every other AFL club currently enjoys.
  • We need to create a Members Social Club within walking distance of the MCG.  
  • For the first time, the State Government are funding a feasibility project involving State Government, the AFL and MFC to explore all possible options within the inner-city MCG local precinct.

 

Now I will go back and read it all. 

But where shall it be...??

16 minutes ago, 640MD said:

For the first time, the State Government are funding a feasibility project involving State Government, the AFL and MFC to explore all possible options within the inner-city MCG local precinct.

I'm not an expert on these kind of things, but this bit seems like sensational news. Progress finally!

 

The only place it can be is the current training oval with an indoor facility/offices and Social space over the existing outside carpark.  The greens will not let us develop any land in the park lands surrounding the MCG.  The club won't want to move outside the Olympic Park/MCG precinct, the study will be the best location at Gosch's paddock , that is why the clubs line has been that the oval is smaller than MCG.

 

Edited by drdrake

37 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

I'm not an expert on these kind of things, but this bit seems like sensational news. Progress finally!

Not too sure about progress.  At the December 2019 Fan Forum they said a working party had been set up with the State Government to explore site options.  Maybe the funding part is new but not the working party.  So its hard to tell how much progress has been made this year.  Having said that it is understandable if it has been slow because of covid lockdowns.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


I'm inclined to make a change on the board.

This comes from not knowing any of the current board or the new candidate.

I think like he did with the team & coach last season, it's time for Bartlett to get a kick up the a...

Now you will not find a more thorough case than that anywhere.

8 minutes ago, rjay said:

I'm inclined to make a change on the board.

This comes from not knowing any of the current board or the new candidate.

I think like he did with the team & coach last season, it's time for Bartlett to get a kick up the a...

Now you will not find a more thorough case than that anywhere.

I voted for new guy but I doubt he will get in. MFC member are a fairly conservative lot. 

 
11 minutes ago, old dee said:

I voted for new guy but I doubt he will get in. MFC member are a fairly conservative lot. 

Bartlett's letter didn't give us much info about his background which is a bit disappointing.  Hard for people to assess him.

How do you vote, od.  The email I received didn't have a voting form attached.

I would imagine Bartlett and co would be out garnering 'proxies', assuming they are allowed.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

1 hour ago, Lord Nev said:

I'm not an expert on these kind of things, but this bit seems like sensational news. Progress finally!

Lord Nev, this information was reported months ago. Someone might be able to confirm but from memory it was discussed in the members forum.


Nothing new here.

What I would like to know is when the feasibility study is due to be finished and the site announced.

Either we get agreement from all stakeholders and commence construction or agreement can’t be reached and we move on to plan B. We can’t keep going around in circles.

I’m prepared to give Bartlett and the Board until the end of this season to have the plans finalised and a date confirmed to start the build otherwise he has to step aside and give someone else a go.

28 minutes ago, rjay said:

I think like he did with the team & coach last season, it's time for Bartlett to get a kick up the a...

I'm neither a fan or a critic of Bartlett but I loved his best and fairest speech (via video)

Was rightfully snaky about missing finals and reminded the players numerous times about how unacceptable it was missing finals YET AGAIN! Was good to hear.

I think the party's over for a few if we miss finals again this year (including Bartlett himself)

 

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell

14 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Bartlett's letter didn't give us much info about his background which is a bit disappointing.  Hard for people to assess him.

How do you vote, od.  The email I received didn't have a voting form attached.

I would imagine Bartlett and co would be out garnering 'proxies', assuming they are allowed.

Should get the voting stuff in the mail.

13 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Bartlett's letter didn't give us much info about his background which is a bit disappointing.  Hard for people to assess him.

How do you vote, od.  The email I received didn't have a voting form attached.

I would imagine Bartlett and co would be out garnering 'proxies', assuming they are allowed.

The info regarding the candidates was contained in election pack which I received in yesterday's mail.

5 minutes ago, Ugottobekidding said:

Should get the voting stuff in the mail.

who uses mail in this day and age

Doubt that an MFC election would be a big target for Russian hackers ?


1 hour ago, drdrake said:

The only place it can be is the current training oval with an indoor facility/offices and Social space over the existing outside carpark.  The greens will not let us develop any land in the park lands surrounding the MCG.  The club won't want to move outside the Olympic Park/MCG precinct, the study will be the best location at Gosch's paddock , that is why the clubs line has been that the oval is smaller than MCG.

 

It certainly looks like Gosch’s Paddock will be revamped into our home. 
Makes Sense...

49 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Bartlett's letter didn't give us much info about his background which is a bit disappointing.  Hard for people to assess him.

How do you vote, od.  The email I received didn't have a voting form attached.

I would imagine Bartlett and co would be out garnering 'proxies', assuming they are allowed.

I received voting forms etc yesterday via post. It has a brief summery about each candidate.  Mailed it back this morning. 

23 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

It certainly looks like Gosch’s Paddock will be revamped into our home. 
Makes Sense...

I think the option list Is 1 SWYL 

Edited by old dee

54 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

who uses mail in this day and age

Doubt that an MFC election would be a big target for Russian hackers ?

Requirement under Corporations Act when club doesn't have an email address.  Members who have not provided one to the club actually cost the club tens of thousands each year.  I think there were 9K last year when volunteers posted out notification of the Annual meeting. 

49 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

It certainly looks like Gosch’s Paddock will be revamped into our home. 
Makes Sense...

The Paddock and conservative surrounds may be too small, sadly. Not much to build upon in terms of a stadium and environs/needs. However, the plans would possibly include a footbridge across from the Richmond station and a walkway from Jolimont. It is not a great distance from reliable transport, some parking and road access. On footy days, it would need heavily-manned police, traffic and co-ordination. 

Shame we cannot have the 'G ... yet Casey Fields has been a good return. Shame that Casey is so far from the city and inner suburbs, too. Are we destined to take second or third best options since the 'G has been drawn and quartered between more influential clubs 'sharing' with the MFC? I truly wonder what the Board might have in mind. If we leave the 'G, there goes a link to heritage, identity and the historical base of Aussie Rules, itself. 

 


Nothing new on the facilities.

The board thing is the most interesting.

I thought the new Directors were filling casual vacancies and there wouldn’t be an election? Now there is one?

The lengthy explanation on how they recruit and approve Directors was very interesting, but also had a thou doth protest too much vibe to it.

If they’ve clearly selected the right individuals why are they worried about one independent challenger?

2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

It certainly looks like Gosch’s Paddock will be revamped into our home. 
Makes Sense...

If we win a flag with that as our home based we could rename it the Golly Gosh.

4 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

I'm not an expert on these kind of things, but this bit seems like sensational news. Progress finally!

If you recall PJ spent over $420,000 on a feasibility study for Yarra Park which proved to have never been a possibility. That was reported in 2018. 

Apparently it's taken two years of hard lobbying to get the State Govt and all stakeholders on board just to do a feasibility study. That's great news in that they haven't rejected us outright but the feasibility study could end up saying there is no where in the precinct that is suitable. Who knows what they look in to. I assume it will have to have some degree of community facilities to get Govt funding. So it's probably not just the site but also a lot of other considerations. Also have no idea what next steps would be if the report is positive. Does the Club then have to set about getting funding from various Govt's and stakeholders etc. I'd say there's a long way to go. 

 

Wow this is slow progress.

So we have been looking for options for the past few years and the progress we have made is to get the state government to 'look' too.

It’s like the bullet train between Sydney and Melbourne.  
 

Six feasibility studies over 20 years costing $xxx millions.  
 

A club without a home !!! Ffs get it done 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • FEATURE: 1925

    A hundred years ago today, on 2 May 1925, Melbourne kicked off the new season with a 47 point victory over St Kilda to take top place on the VFL ladder after the opening round of the new season.  Top place was a relatively unknown position for the team then known as the “Fuchsias.” They had finished last in 1923 and rose by only one place in the following year although the final home and away round heralded a promise of things to come when they surprised the eventual premiers Essendon. That victory set the stage for more improvement and it came rapidly. In this series, I will tell the story of how the 1925 season unfolded for the Melbourne Football Club and how it made the VFL finals for the first time in a decade on the way to the ultimate triumph a year later.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    Saturday’s election night game in Perth between the West Coast Eagles and Melbourne represents 18th vs 15th which makes it a tough decision as to which party to favour. The Eagles have yet to break the ice under their new coach in Andrew McQualter who is the second understudy in a row to confront Demon Coach Simon Goodwin who was also winless until a fortnight ago. On that basis, many punters might be considering to go with the donkey vote but I’ve been assigned with the task of helping readers to come to a considered opinion on this matter of vital importance across the nation. It was almost a year ago that I wrote a preview here of the Demons’ away game against the Eagles (under the name William from Waalitj because it was Indigenous Round).  I issued a warning that it was a danger game, based on my local knowledge that the home team were no longer easybeats and that they possessed a wunderkind generational player in Harley Reid who was capable of producing stellar performances playing among men a decade and more older than he.  At the time, the Eagles already had two wins off the back of a couple of the young man’s masterclasses and they had recently given the Bombers a scare straight after their Anzac Day blockbuster draw against the then reigning premiers.

      • Haha
    • 1 reply
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 08

    Round 08 of the 2025 AFL Season kicks off on Thursday with a must-win game for the Bombers to stay in touch with the top eight, while the struggling Roos seek a morale-boosting upset. Friday sees the Saints desperate for a win as well if they are to stay in finals contention and their opponents the Dockers will be eager to crack in to the Top 8 with a win on the road. Saturday kicks off with a pivotal clash for both sides asthe Bulldogs look to solidify their top-eight spot, while Port seeks to shake their pretender tag. Then the Crows will be looking to steady their topsy turvy season against a resurgent Blues looking to make it 4 wins on the trot. On Election Night a Blockbuster will see the ladder-leading Pies take on the Cats, who are keen to bounce back after a narrow loss. On Sunday the Sydney Derby promises fireworks as the Giants aim to cement their top-eight status, while the Swans fight to keep their season alive. The Hawks, celebrating their centenary, will be looking to easily account for the Tigers who are desperate to halt their slide. The Round concludes on Sunday Night with a top end of the table QClash with significant ladder implications; both Queensland teams are in scintillating form. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • Like
    • 153 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons hit the road in Round 8, heading to Perth to face the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium. With momentum building, the Dees will be aiming for a third straight victory to keep their season revival on course. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 563 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Richmond

    The fans who turned up to the MCG for Melbourne’s Anzac Day Eve clash against Richmond would have been disappointed if they turned up to see a great spectacle. As much as this was a night for the 71,635 in attendance to commemorate heroes of the nation’s past wars, it was also a time for the Melbourne Football Club to consolidate upon its first win after a horrific start to the 2025 season. On this basis, despite the fact that it was an uninspiring and dour struggle for most of its 100 minutes, the night will be one for the fans to remember. They certainly got value out of the pre match activity honouring those who fought for their country. The MCG and the lights of the city as backdrop was made for nights such as these and, in my view, we received a more inspirational ceremony of Anzac culture than others both here and elsewhere around the country. 

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Richmond

    The match up of teams competing in our great Aussie game at its second highest level is a rarity for a work day Thursday morning but the blustery conditions that met the players at a windswept Casey Fields was something far more commonplace.They turned the opening stanza between the Casey Demons and a somewhat depleted Richmond VFL into a mess of fumbling unforced errors, spilt marks and wasted opportunities for both sides but they did set up a significant win for the home team which is exactly what transpired on this Anzac Day round opener. Casey opened up strong against the breeze with the first goal to Aidan Johnson, the Tigers quickly responded and the game degenerated into a defensive slog and the teams were level when the first siren sounded.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland