Jump to content

Featured Replies

Whilst we have TMac's Salary on the Books, we can't afford Philips. Club is definitely interested, but we planned to move on TMac, and that hasn't happened.

The Club still has not been given list sizes from the AFL!!

 

Can we suspend our outrage about MFC's trading etc until after the dust has settled and all constraints clearer.  Those posters who are firing off rockets are doing their own reputations no good IMO. 

It may end up being portrayed differently in the media but Tom wants to stay at Collingwood.

As has been reported he may be squeezed out. I’d say in the last week or so he’s had a discussion with the club and gone from “not going anywhere” to “going elsewhere if forced to”.

Absolute amateur hour at Collingwood at the moment. Morale would have to be extremely low.

 
2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Extremely disappointing. 

Besides Brown what a crud trade period this will be.

A chance to fill in a position that we've been screaming out for and it goes straight through our hands.

You should know by now dazzle, players pick clubs and not the other way around. 

If a player wants more money/longer terms/role etc they eill pick the realvent club. 

For all we know Phillips has rejected us and or we don't have the cap space for his demands.

Edited by Unleash Hell

Could it be as simple as he just didn’t want to come to MFC? 


2 hours ago, Redleg said:

Not sure that’s true. 

Maybe we don't have appropriate trade assets to satisfy Collingwood and Hawthorn do?

2 minutes ago, Domgus Petrogan said:

Maybe we don't have appropriate trade assets to satisfy Collingwood and Hawthorn do?

From our perspective may need the trade assets (picks) for other prioritised targets and/or it could be a salary cap issue (either now or the implications for next year when several key contracts come up for renewal).

For Hawthorn it's a neat fit, I.Smith out and T.Phillips in.

3 hours ago, adonski said:

My thinking too. 

Me three.

While Smith was perfect as he was free and could fill a hole for 2-3 years while somebody else developed. Phillips cost draft picks and would be excess once Macrea?? is ready.

 
6 minutes ago, Grimes Times said:

Me three.

While Smith was perfect as he was free and could fill a hole for 2-3 years while somebody else developed. Phillips cost draft picks and would be excess once Macrea?? is ready.

Wouldn't shock me if the logic behind Smith was almost a succession plan for 1/2 years while the drafted kid developed the tank required for the position. With Phillips only 24 you'd be 'stuck' with him should you pick up a good kid in the draft at the same position. 

8 minutes ago, adonski said:

Wouldn't shock me if the logic behind Smith was almost a succession plan for 1/2 years while the drafted kid developed the tank required for the position. With Phillips only 24 you'd be 'stuck' with him should you pick up a good kid in the draft at the same position. 

I think it’s more about shedding Tmc $$$. If he stays , we probably can’t add too much in terms of players costing us $$$. 


4 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

I think it’s more about shedding Tmc $$$. If he stays , we probably can’t add too much in terms of players costing us $$$. 

Not sure about that. Phillips might be on decent coin but they'd find a way if they really wanted to. 

2 hours ago, Demons11 said:

?

So are we having a real sniff D11?

7 minutes ago, DemonOX said:

So are we having a real sniff D11?

Nah, I mentioned last week he was off to the Hawks.  Dazzle said I was throwing darts 

3 hours ago, one_demon said:

Genuine wingman don't grow on trees

Only Flowers which grow well! 


3 hours ago, sue said:

Can we suspend our outrage about MFC's trading etc until after the dust has settled and all constraints clearer.  Those posters who are firing off rockets are doing their own reputations no good IMO. 

Yeah well that's ok but Meanwhile many other clubs are making more moves than I did on the disco dance floors in the seventies. Other than Brown.... we dont appear to have fired a shot!!! Floundering yet again!

Edited by picket fence

1 hour ago, picket fence said:

 Other than Brown.... we dont appear to have fired a shot!!! Floundering yet again!

There's always a bit of FOMO this time of year

4 hours ago, Demons11 said:

Nah, I mentioned last week he was off to the Hawks.  Dazzle said I was throwing darts 

if a player voluntarily wants to go to hawthorn rn instead of us then we are in a far more ugly place than i thought.

16 minutes ago, Turner said:

if a player voluntarily wants to go to hawthorn rn instead of us then we are in a far more ugly place than i thought.

Why’s that? Because they had 1 bad year,  We have had 50 of them 

2 hours ago, Demons11 said:

Why’s that? Because they had 1 bad year,  We have had 50 of them 

56 to be exact!


24 minutes ago, The Third Eye said:

Hawks fan I know reckons that they’re going to get both Phillips and Treloar.

Could be right, they have shed a few of their players in the last few years, so they have both spots and cash.

On 11/6/2020 at 3:06 PM, Demons11 said:

Nah, I mentioned last week he was off to the Hawks.  Dazzle said I was throwing darts 

Collingwood's Tom Phillips could return to the club next season, with Hawthorn "unlikely" to advance its interest in the wingman.

....

 
15 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Collingwood's Tom Phillips could return to the club next season, with Hawthorn "unlikely" to advance its interest in the wingman.

....

Well, if we want him he could now be ours for the taking, as no apparent interest from other clubs and Pies desperate to make cap space. One would think with Langdon controlling one wing, Phillips with some help from Baker, Hunt and Tomlinson, could manage the other. Wing positions filled.

Edited by Redleg

44 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Collingwood's Tom Phillips could return to the club next season, with Hawthorn "unlikely" to advance its interest in the wingman.

....

So what’s your point?  As I have said 1000 times, I’m happy to pass on some of the mail I get.  It doesn’t always come off but Hawks are still definitely interested but also might have their eyes on someone else at the Pies


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Like
    • 12 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
    • 34 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 20 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 223 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland