NON MFC: Round 16

[Redleg 41,963]

1 hour ago, bingers said:

Never thought I'd be saying "go poos and wees"  !!!

When you want other teams to win for us they generally lose. Yes I know plenty on here will post we should worry about ourselves and win our own games.

[old dee 24,006]

11 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Gawn, May, Petracca, Oliver, Langdon, Brayshaw, Lever and Salem are probably our best and the 3 newbies all look good.

Agree with most of that, but not convinced on Kossi yet. Might be too early to tell. Interesting that only one of them is a forward and only a part time one at that. 

Edited September 6, 2020 by old dee

[Satan 2,915]

Too early to say carn hawks , but 3 bad misses grr

costly

Edited September 6, 2020 by Satan

[Brownie 6,067]

Wow Frosty. Very ordinary

[dazzledavey36 55,912]

Frosty ???

[Delusional demon 82 1,197]

2 minutes ago, Brownie said:

Wow Frosty. Very ordinary

Hopefully hawthorns 2nd round pick we get  has better foot skills 

[Bring-Back-Powell 15,289]

Those late 2 St Kilda goals were very costly.

The only way we’re playing finals is if we can chase down St Kilda’s percentage assuming they lose their last 2 games, and the Dogs lose tonight.

Edited September 6, 2020 by Bring-Back-Powell

[godees 892]

If we win all three games (however unlikely that is) we make it

[Bring-Back-Powell 15,289]

8 minutes ago, godees said:

If we win all three games (however unlikely that is) we make it

We could possibly make it with 9 wins if the Saints have a couple of solid losses against quality sides and the Dogs lose tonight.

St Kilda are actually vulnerable given their tough run home.

[Clintosaurus 7,926]

Essendon got to the ground an hour before the game. 3.5 hour trip from the Goldy. Started like we did.

[layzie 34,348]

Seems like Frost saved his worst for this one.

[Pickett2Jackson 3,904]

Well we wont catch the Saints.  Its all about GWS now.

Still cant believe we lost to Sydney... 

[old dee 24,006]

11 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Well we wont catch the Saints.  Its all about GWS now.

Still cant believe we lost to Sydney... 

Well at least we can say we beat someone in the eight p2j

[buck_nekkid 6,068]

Cats are tearing the bummers a new one.  This could get ugly...

[chook fowler 19,694]

Essendon are putrid - They’ll kill us.

[Forest Demon 4,681]

43 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

We could possibly make it with 9 wins if the Saints have a couple of solid losses against quality sides and the Dogs lose tonight.

St Kilda are actually vulnerable given their tough run home.

If Collingwood lose to Gold Coast, that would also leave the door ajar. Gold Coast are no easy beats this year, and I'm still not keen on Collingwood's form.

[Forest Demon 4,681]

Watching Essendon is the perfect remedy for the blues I've got after Thursday's game. At least we aren't them is all I will say.

Edited September 6, 2020 by Forest Demon

[Ethan Tremblay 31,243]

82-17, Geelong lead Essendon. Eat a bag druggies. 

[titan_uranus 25,176]

19 hours ago, Lord Travis said:

Good clubs don’t make excuses.

We continue to make excuses and remain a loser club.

Has anyone at the club said anything about the fixture or the flying into Cairns?

As far as I'm aware, no.

The only people mentioning it are supporters.

FWIW, we've had as hard a fixture as anyone this year. I heard someone previewing the Dogs-Eagles game tonight saying that the Dogs have a 4-3 record at Metricon this year. That's 7 games at the same venue - we haven't played more than 2 games at any venue all year. There is, in my view, no doubt at all that we've had to do it tougher than most in terms of moving around, acclimatising to conditions and ground sizes, and trying to get some sort of consistency to our "home" games.

None of that is enough to explain the Sydney performance, but it is a factor to consider when the season is said and done.

[sue 9,197]

Damn. For a while they  were on track to win by almost a 186 equivalent   

[Diamond_Jim 12,693]

So mathematically let alone probability wise that's the end of the Bomber's season.

Assuming our final round is a dead rubber who would you pick ?

[Bitter but optimistic 22,289]

4 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

So mathematically let alone probability wise that's the end of the Bomber's season.

Assuming our final round is a dead rubber who would you pick ?

Don't go there Jim !!!

[KysaiahMessiah 725]

4 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

So mathematically let alone probability wise that's the end of the Bomber's season.

Assuming our final round is a dead rubber who would you pick ?

If its a dead rubber, us.  If we're alive and Essendon is dead, we all know the result ...

[old dee 24,006]

6 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

So mathematically let alone probability wise that's the end of the Bomber's season.

Assuming our final round is a dead rubber who would you pick ?

Bombers with no doubt.

Edited September 6, 2020 by old dee

[old dee 24,006]

6 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

So mathematically let alone probability wise that's the end of the Bomber's season.

Assuming our final round is a dead rubber who would you pick ?

Round about now I would have a hammy if I were a bombers player. You could relax and enjoy the weather on the gold coast for the next couple of weeks.