Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

25 year old winger from Richmond.

SEN this morning saying he's not getting much game time this year and suggesting a falling out with Hardwick.

Thoughts?

McIntosh stats

 

 

Throw sh*t at the wall until it sticks.

Realistically he can cover decent ground and can hit the scoreboard too, so he’s not the worst option. Just wouldn’t give up much for him. Token 4th round would be fine for depth.

 
  • Author
6 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Throw sh*t at the wall until it sticks.

Ok, if that's what turns you on....

5 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Realistically he can cover decent ground and can hit the scoreboard too, so he’s not the worst option. Just wouldn’t give up much for him. Token 4th round would be fine for depth.

Yep, pretty much around the mark there LT.

He is one player suggested in here that I wouldn't mind getting IF he was actually available.  


Is he better than what we have in Stretch, ANB, Kennedy Harris, Spargo and the others that sit on the fringe?

With all players we bring up the first question needs to be will they make our best 22 and then will they make us a better team.

The next question is what will it cost us and is that something we are willing to part with.

No more depth players, we want players that will be in our best 22 or banging on the door to be in our best 22.

1 hour ago, drdrake said:

Is he better than what we have in Stretch, ANB, Kennedy Harris, Spargo and the others that sit on the fringe?

With all players we bring up the first question needs to be will they make our best 22 and then will they make us a better team.

The next question is what will it cost us and is that something we are willing to part with.

No more depth players, we want players that will be in our best 22 or banging on the door to be in our best 22.

The difference between McIntosh and Stretch, Kennedy Harris, Spargo etc is that he is actually big enough to compete and win one-on-one contests, which is vital on the wing.

 

6 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

The difference between McIntosh and Stretch, Kennedy Harris, Spargo etc is that he is actually big enough to compete and win one-on-one contests, which is vital on the wing.

 

Thats the key, could wina one on one on the wing then run. The small guys can sometimes half the contest but then its either a stoppage or a turnover which halts all momentum. 

 
Year   Team   #   GM   W-D-L   KI   MK   HB   DI   GL   BH   HO   TK   RB   IF   CL   CG   FF   FA   BR   CP   UP   CM   MI   1%   BO   GA  
Totals 90 60-0-30 896 339 441 1337 26 20 2 239 174 247 73 239 50 75 2 438 891 27 27 200 58 31
Averages 18.00 66.67% 9.96 3.77 4.90 14.86 0.29 0.22 0.02 2.66 1.93 2.74 0.81 2.66 0.56 0.83 0.02 4.87 9.90 0.30 0.30 2.22 0.64 0.34
2015 Richmond 33 23 15-0-8 242 94 111 353 8 8   60 47 58 25 52 12 16 2 101 243 2 8 32 16 12
2016 Richmond 33 6 1-0-5 73 30 35 108   1   14 24 12 6 19 7 8   35 75 3 1 15 1 2
2017 Richmond 33 24 17-0-7 231 85 127 358 2 5   76 45 64 10 57 8 15   116 238 10 4 68 17 8
2018 Richmond 33 21 17-0-4 198 66 94 292 9 3   43 38 62 17 63 8 25   92 198 2 11 51 14 4
2019 Richmond 33 16 10-0-6 152 64 74 226 7 3 2 46 20 51 15 48 15 11   94 137 10 3 34 10 5

Edited by Redleg

I put his stats in above post so you could all see them.

He always looks ok when he plays, but doesn't have high disposals or goals or goal assists.

 Height: 191cm Weight: 91kg Position: Midfield.

He has pace and good disposal.

Is he better than most of our players in his position, yes he is.

He is also a Premiership player, from a good club and if we got him for a reasonable deal I would go for it.

Edited by Redleg


SEN Breakfast’s Sam Edmund has suggested that the 25-year-old may be having second thoughts about remaining with the Tigers.

“Kamdyn McIntosh is interesting, he re-signed two months ago at Richmond on a two-year deal, I think he might be gettable though,” he told SEN Breakfast.

“He’s out of the side, his last game was Round 17, he’s out of favour suddenly. If he doesn’t play finals, watch this space.

“If a club came for McIntosh, his head might be turned.”

Richmond defender "might be gettable"

 

13 minutes ago, Redleg said:

He has pace and good disposal.

Is he better than most of our players in his position, yes he is.

Has consistently gone around 70% disposal efficiency, but I’ve seen him make some Frost level mistakes with ball in hand so not convinced. If we manage to get in Langdon im not sure we need another winger,  otherwise I’d be looking at Karl Amon. 

I’m hoping we get KK up and going and stick him out on a wing, was an elite ball user back in 2015 where he was runner up in the suns bnf. 

20 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I believe @Ethan Tremblay knows something of such peccadillos  Moonie.

It’s the easiest way to get it onto my coat hanger, just scrape it off the wall. 

If the price is right then it’s a yes from me, he’s a better option than the players we have that have already been named in this thread. Unless I’m mistaken, Richmond seem pretty reasonable to deal with. Perhaps a fourth round pick or our third for McIntosh and a fourth.

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

I know he's no world beater, but I've actually always rated him. Super strong and just always seems to win those crucial 1-on-1 contests on a wing. He is clearly an upgrade in depth from the likes of Stretch, and a better option than Amon imo.

I wouldn't be surprised to see us get Langdon, and then go after 1 of Cutler, McIntosh or Amon on the cheap.


2 hours ago, drdrake said:

Is he better than what we have in Stretch, ANB, Kennedy Harris, Spargo and the others that sit on the fringe?

With all players we bring up the first question needs to be will they make our best 22 and then will they make us a better team.

The next question is what will it cost us and is that something we are willing to part with.

No more depth players, we want players that will be in our best 22 or banging on the door to be in our best 22.

In answer to question is he better than Stretch, ANB, JKH Spargo ...YES HE IS!!

Tough, strong , Quick, good skills, Touch of Mongrel 

Whats not to like??

Edited by picket fence

59 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

No no no.  He is a spud!

Good to see we are aiming high this trade period D11!

FMD, if he is the quality we are after, we may as well shut up shop.


2 hours ago, picket fence said:

In answer to question is he better than Stretch, ANB, JKH Spargo ...YES HE IS!!

Tough, strong , Quick, good skills, Touch of Mongrel 

Whats not to like??

TBH I would trade the lot of them if we got McIntosh. It would free up cap space and then hope KK comes good and that a few of our youngsters in Swallow, Jordon, Bedford and Nietschke develop into AFL standard. Getting Langdon and maybe Amon make the others above superfluous to our needs.

1 hour ago, Demon Disciple said:

Good to see we are aiming high this trade period D11!

FMD, if he is the quality we are after, we may as well shut up shop.

He’s a better alternative though to other players who are currently getting a game. I do hope we’re concentrating more on getting an ‘A’ grader and players like McIntosh are just being looked at as upgrades on JKH, Stretch and ANB etc. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

 
3 hours ago, Demon Disciple said:

Good to see we are aiming high this trade period D11!

FMD, if he is the quality we are after, we may as well shut up shop.

I agree.   

Lets hope it’s not the case 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 91 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 344 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies